The important contribution of the social sciences to research on a wide range of environmental issues is increasingly being recognised, and a major programme of the Economic and Social Research Council is focusing particularly on aspects of risk, rural land use, environmental economics, and energy conservation. The programme emphasises a cross-disciplinary approach to research and some of the reasons for this are discussed in this paper, and also the difficulties of putting it into practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowersJKCheshireP, 1983Agriculture, the Countryside and Land Use: An Economic Critique (Methuen, And over, Hants)
2.
ChecklandP, 1981Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
3.
CollinsK, 1986, “Pollution, politics and people—political aspects”Chemistry and Industry 6 January, pp 9–12
4.
EdenCJonesSSimsD, 1983Messing About in Problems (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
5.
HagueD, 1984, “The context of change”ESRC Newsletter number 53, 7–8
6.
HodgeI, 1986, “Countryside change: A review of research”Economic and Social Research Council, 160 Great Portland St, London
7.
HopeCWOwensS, 1986, “Research policy and review 10. Frameworks for studying energy and the environment”Environment and Planning A18851–-864
8.
KempRO'RiordanTPurdueM, 1985, “Investigation as legitimacy: The maturing of the big public inquiry”Geoforum17477–485
9.
LowePDCoxGMacEwenMO'RiordanTWinterM, 1986Countryside Conflicts: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
10.
LowePDRudigW, 1986, “Political ecology and the social sciences: The state of the art”British Journal of Political Science16223–260
11.
MacgillSO'RiordanT, 1984, “Environmental issues in the 1980s” ESRC report on research needs after an ESRC-sponsored seminar, 28–29 November, 1983, Environment and Planning Committee, Economic and Social Research Council, 160 Great Portland Street, London W1
12.
MacgillSRavetzJRFuntowitzSO, 1985, “Scientific reassurance as public policy—the logic of the Black Report” WP-448, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds
13.
MeehanRL, 1984The Atom and the Fault (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
O'RiordanT, 1981Environmentalism (Pion, London)
15.
O'RiordanTPurdueMKempR, 1987Sizewell B: An Anatomy of a Major Inquiry (Macmillan, London) forthcoming
16.
SchönDA, 1983The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Maurice Temple Smith, London)
17.
Select Committee on Science and Technology, 1984, “4th report: Agricultural and Environmental Research, volume 1. Report”House of Lords Papers and Bills—Session 1983–84272–1 (HMSO, London)
18.
Select Committee on Science and Technology, 1985“5th report: Agricultural and environmental research: Government response to the 4th report of the Select Committee”House of Lords Papers and Bills—Session 1984–85233 (HMSO, London)
19.
SheailJ, 1985Pesticides and Nature Conservation: The British Experience 1950–1975 (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
20.
TaitEJO'RiordanT, 1986, “ESRC Research Programme on Environmental Issues” manuscript in preparation. Economic and Social Research Council, 160 Great Portland Street, London W1
21.
TomlinsonRKissI, (Eds), 1984Rethinking the Process of Operational Research and Systems Analysis (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
22.
VickersG, 1984, “The end of free fall” in The Vickers Papers Ed. The Open Systems Group (Harper and Row, London) pp 55–67 (first published in The Listener 1965)
23.
WilsonAG, 1985, “Editorial: Research Policy and Review”Environment and Planning A174–5
