This paper is a preliminary review of small firm subcontracting. It is argued that increasingly subcontracting and other forms of small firm activities are becoming a central part of the operations of large firms. As a result, small firms have to be viewed as central elements in the economy. In this paper three issues are reviewed as a prerequisite to empirical research. First, an outline is presented of theoretical proposals on interfirm linkages. Second, the nature of subcontracting is outlined. The paper concludes with a categorisation of different ways in which subcontracting relations are formed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BagnascoA, 1981, “Labour markets, class structure and regional formations in Italy”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research540–44.
2.
BergerSPioreM J, 1980Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
3.
BeynonHHudsonRLewisDSadlerDTownsendA, 1985, “Middlesbrough: Contradictions in economic and cultural change” working paper, Project Team, Changing Urban and Regional Systems Project, Department of Geography and Sociology, University of Durham, Durham.
4.
BIM, 1985, “Managing new patterns of work”report of the Organisation of Work Panel of the BIM Economic and Social Affairs Committee, British Institute of Management, Management House, Parker St, London WC2.
5.
BoltonJ E, 1971, “Report of the Committee on Inquiry on Small Firms” Cmnd 4811 (HMSO, London).
6.
BruscoS, 1982, “The Emilian model: Productive decentralization and social integration”The Cambridge Journal of Economics6167–184.
7.
BruscoSSabelC, 1981, “Artisan production and economic growth”The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 99–114.
8.
ChaillouB, 1977, “Definition et typologie de la sous traitance”Revue Economique28262–285.
9.
CookePEvansC, 1985, “Homeworking in Britain” apaper presented at the Urban and Regional Change Conference, University of Sussex, 16–19 April 1985; copy obtainable from P Cooke, Department of Town Planning, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff.
10.
CookePda RosaPires A, 1985, “Production decentralisation in three European regions”Environment and Planning A17527–554.
11.
CurranJStanworthC W, 1983, “Franchising in the modern economy: Towards a theoretical understanding”International Small Business Journal2(1) 8–26.
12.
EdwardsR, 1979Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Work Place in the Twentieth Century (Heinemann Educational Books, London).
13.
FredrickssonC GLindmarkL G, 1977, “From firms to systems of firms: A study of interregional dependence in a dynamic society”Industrial Systems, Volume 1 Eds HamiltonF E ILingeG J K, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 155–186.
14.
FriedmanA, 1977Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism (Macmillan, London).
15.
GordonD MEdwardsRReichM, 1982Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labour in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
16.
GreenD HWalkerS, 1979, “Independence and control in relation to the small firm” WP3, Medium and Small Firms Research Project, School of Town Planning, Leeds Polytechnic, Leeds.
17.
GudginGBrunskillIFothergillS, 1979New Manufacturing Firms in Regional Employment Growth Research Series 39 (CES Books, London).
18.
HoareA, 1978, “Industrial linkages and the dual economy”Regional Studies12(2) 43–57.
19.
HolmesJ, 1986, “The organisation and locational structure of production subcontracting”The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism: Production, Work and Territory Eds ScottA JStorperM, (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) forthcoming.
20.
ImrieR, 1985, “Work decentralization and industrial change into the 1980s” a research proposal submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council; copy obtainable from the author.
21.
JohnsonL CJohnsonR E, 1983The Seam Allowance: Industrial Home Sewing in Canada (Women's Press, Toronto).
22.
KaplinskyR, 1983, “Firm size and technical change in a dynamic context”Journal of Industrial Economics32(1) 39–60.
23.
KayW, 1983, Article on Marks and SpencerSunday Times19 June, page 22.
24.
KeebleD E, 1968, “Industrial decentralization and the metropolis: The North West London case”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers441–54.
25.
KeebleD E, 1976Industrial Location and Planning in the United Kingdom (Methuen, Andover, Hants).
26.
KleinBCrawfordR GAlchainA A, 1982, “Vertical integration, approachable rents and the competitive contracting process”Economic Journal6323–41.
27.
McDermottP J, 1977Regional Variations in Enterprise: Electronics Firms in Scotland, London and the Outer Metropolitan AreaPhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
28.
McDermottP JTaylorM J, 1982Industrial Organisation and Location (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
29.
MarshallJ N, 1980, “Spatial variations in manufacturing industry demand for business services: Some implications for government economic policies” WP35, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
30.
MasonC MHarrisonR T, 1985, “The geography of small firms in the UK: Towards a research agenda”Progress in Human Geography9(1) 1–37.
31.
MenschG, 1977Stalemate in Technology (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).
32.
MingioneE, 1981, “Information, restructuring and the survival strategies of the working class”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research7311–339.
33.
MitterS, 1986, “Industrial restructuring and manufacturing homework: Immigrant women in the UK clothing industry”Capital and Class2737–80.
34.
MooreC W, 1972, “Industrial linkage development paths in growth poles: A research methodology”Environment and Planning4253–271.
35.
MooreC W, 1973, “Industrial linkage development paths: A case study of two industrial complexes in the Puget Sound Region”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie6493–107.
36.
MoseleyM JTownroeP M, 1973, “Linkage adjustment following industrial movement”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie64137–144.
37.
MurrayR, 1985, “Benetton Britain: The new economic order”Marxism Today November issue, pp 28–32.
38.
O'FarrellP NO'LoughlinB, 1980, “An analysis of new industry linkages in Ireland” publication series paper 6, Industrial Development Authority, Dublin.
39.
RainnieA, 1984, “Combined and uneven development in the clothing industry: The effects of competition and accumulation”Capital and Class2261–73.
40.
RainnieA, 1985, “Small firms, big problems: The political economy of small businesses”Capital and Class2542–56.
41.
RichardsonG B, 1972, “The organisation of industry”Economic Journal82883–896.
42.
RichterC, 1969, “The impact of industrial linkages on geographic association”Journal of Regional Science919–28.
43.
RuberyJWilkinsonF, 1981, “Outwork and segmented labour markets” in The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 115–132.
SabelC F, 1982Work and Politics: The Division of Labour in Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
46.
ScaseRGoffeeR, 1982The Entrepreneurial Middle Class (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent).
47.
ScottA J, 1984, “Industrial organisation and the logic of intra metropolitan location III; a case study of the women's dress industry in the Greater Los Angeles Area”Economic Geography603–27.
48.
SheardP, 1983, “Auto production systems in Japan: Organisational and locational features”Australian Geographical Studies21(1) 49–68.
49.
ShuttJWhittingtonR, 1984, “Large firm strategies and the rise of small units: The illusion of small firm job generation” WP15, North West Industry Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester.
50.
StewartJ C, 1976, “Linkages and foreign direct investment”Regional Studies10245–258.
51.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1982a, “Industrial linkage and the segmented economy: 1. Some theoretical proposals”Environment and Planning A141601–1613.
52.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1982b, “Industrial linkage and the segmented economy: 2. An empirical reinterpretation”Environment and Planning A141615–1632.
53.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1983, “Business organisation, segmentation and location”Regional Studies17445–465.
54.
The Economist, 1984, “Flexible high-flyers” 29 September, page 79Tokyo.
55.
Metropolitan Council, 1972, “Minor industries and workers in Tokyo”Tokyo Metropolitan Council, Tokyo.
56.
TGWU, 1983British Leyland: The Next Decadereport by the TGWU in association with AUEW/TASS, Birmingham.
57.
VillaP, 1981, “Labour market segmentation and the construction industry in Italy” in The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 133–150.
58.
WalkerS R, 1977, “Linkage structures in an urban economy”Regional Studies11263–273.
59.
WatanabeS, 1971, “Subcontracting, industrialisation and employment creation”International Labour Review10451–76.
60.
WatanabeS, 1972, “International subcontracting, employment and skill promotion”International Labour Review105425–449.
