EwingG O, 1986, “Spatial pattern in distance deterrence parameters and Fotheringham's theory of competing destinations”Environment and Planning A18547–551
2.
FotheringhamA S, 1981, “Spatial structure and distance-decay parameters”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71425–436
3.
FotheringhamA S, 1983a, “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations”Environment and Planning A1515–36
4.
FotheringhamA S, 1983b, “Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models”Environment and Planning A151121–1132
5.
FotheringhamA S, 1984, “Spatial flows and spatial patterns”Environment and Planning A16529–543
6.
FotheringhamA S, 1985a, “Marketing analysis and hierarchical destination choice: Replacing the gravity model formulation” paper presented at the 1985 ORSA/TIMS Annual Conference; manuscript available from the author FotheringhamA S, 1985b, “Spatial competition and agglomeration in urban modelling”Environment and Planning A17213–230
7.
FotheringhamA S, 1986, “Modelling hierarchical destination choice”Environment and Planning A18401–418
