The provision of public libraries in a metropolitan area is evaluated using 1981 Census data. Measures of accessibility to libraries are computed and the access of particular potential user groups is highlighted and explored empirically. Proposals for further investment in library provision are examined using Census data on the distribution of potential users and location — allocation methods. Last, the extension of the approach to look at the spatial organisation of a mobile library service is demonstrated.
DES, 1974, “Library Information Series: 4. Public libraries and their use”Department of Education and Science (HMSO, London)
3.
GatrellA C, 1984, “Letter to the editor. The measurement of access to local shopping opportunities: A comparison of accessibility measures”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design11243–244
4.
GatrellA CColeK J, 1983, “Quantitative geographical explorations of small-area Census data”, research note 2, CAMPUS Census Project, Department of Geography, University of Salford, Salford, Lancs
5.
GodwinT M, 1981, “Developments in Manchester's public libraries as a result of the Inner City Programme”Journal of Librarianship13141–153
6.
GuyC M, 1983, “The assessment of access to local shopping opportunities: A comparison of accessibility measures”Environment and Planning B10219–238
7.
HodgartR L, 1978, “Optimizing access to public services: A review of problems, models and methods of locating central facilities”Progress in Human Geography217–48
8.
HodgeD CGatrellA C, 1976, “Spatial constraint and the location of urban public facilities”Environment and Planning A8215–230
9.
JonesKKirbyA, 1980, “The use of chi-square maps in the analysis of Census data”Geoforum11409–417
10.
JonesKKirbyA, 1982, “Provision and wellbeing: An agenda for public resources research”Environment and Planning A14297–310
11.
JosephA EPhillipsD R, 1984Accessibility and Utilization: Geographical Perspectives on Health Care Delivery (Harper and Row, London)
12.
KirbyA M, 1982The Politics of Location (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
13.
KirbyA MKnoxP LPinchS, (Eds), 1984Public Service Provision and Urban Development (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
14.
KnoxP L, 1978, “The intraurban ecology of primary medical care: Patterns of accessibility and their policy implications”Environment and Planning A10415–435
15.
LevyFMeltsnerA JWildavskyA, 1974Urban Outcomes: Schools, Streets and Libraries (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
16.
LineberryR, 1977Equality and Urban Policy (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
17.
McLaffertyS LGhoshA, 1982, “Issues in measuring differential access to public services”Urban Studies19383–389
18.
MladenkaK RHillK Q, 1977, “The distribution of benefits in an urban environment: Parks and libraries in Houston”Urban Affairs Quarterly1373–94
19.
PinchS, 1984, “Inequality in pre-school provision: A geographical perspective” in Public Service Provision and Urban Development Eds KirbyA MKnoxP LPinchS, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 231–282
20.
RushtonG, 1979Optimal Location of Facilities (Compress, Wentworth, NH)
21.
RushtonGGoodchildM FOstreshL M, 1973, “Computer programs for location — allocation problems” monograph 6, Department of Geography, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
22.
StewartJ DSpencerK MWebsterB A, 1976, “Local government: Approaches to urban deprivation” OP-1, Urban Deprivation Unit, Home Office, 50 Queen Anne's Gate, London SW1
23.
UURCC, 1985, “1981 Census data at UURCC”, 2nd edition, University of Manchester Regional Computer Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester
24.
VisvalinghamM, 1978, “The signed chi-square measure for mapping”Cartographic Journal1593–98
