This paper is an examination of whether welfare program use is more responsive to economic conditions of need or to characteristics of program supply. The results of an analysis of growth in a major US welfare program illustrate that these forces do not operate independently of one another. Instead, welfare participation dynamics reflect economic need only in those jurisdictions where the program is effectively supplied. The policy implications concern the spatially decentralized operation of public programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbinP SSteinB, 1968, “The constrained demand for public assistance”Journal of Human Resources3300–311
2.
AlbinP SSteinB, 1971, “Determinants of relief policy at the sub-federal level”Southern Economic Journal37445–457
3.
BallietL, 1974, “Anglo poverty in the rural south”Center for the Study of Human Resources, University of Texas, Austin, TX
4.
BrehmC TSavingT R, 1964, “The demand for general assistance payments”American Economic Review541002–1018
5.
BrehmC TSavingT R, 1967, “The demand for general assistance payments: Reply”American Economic Review57585–588
6.
BryantW K, 1972, “An analysis of the market for food stamps”American Journal of Agricultural Economics54305–314
7.
CasettiE, 1972, “Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographic research”Geographical Analysis481–91
8.
CasettiE, 1982, “Mathematical modelling and the expansion method” in Statistics for Geographers and Social Scientists Ed. MandaiR B (Concept Publishing, New Dehli) pp 81–95
9.
CasettiE, 1986, “The dual expansions method: An application to evaluating the effects of population growth on development”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics16 forthcoming
10.
ChiefE, 1979, “Need determination in the AFDC program”Social Security Bulletin4211–21
11.
CowartA T, 1969, “Anti-poverty expenditures in the American states: A comparative analysis”Midwest Journal of Political Science13219–236
12.
DuncanGCoeR D, 1984, “The dynamics of welfare use” in Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The Changing Economic Fortunes of American Workers and Families Ed. DuncanG. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; pp 11–94
13.
DurbinE, 1973, “Work and welfare: The case of Aid to Families with Dependent Children”Journal of Human Resources8103–125
14.
ElazarD J, 1972American Federalism: A View from the States (Thomas Y Crowell, New York)
15.
GarfinkelIOrrL L, 1974, “Welfare policy and the employment rate of AFDC mothers”National Tax Journal27275–284
16.
HosekJ R, 1982, “The AFDC-Unemployed Fathers Program: Determinants of participation and implications for welfare reform” in Welfare Reform in America Ed. SommersP M (Kluwer Nijhoff, Boston, MA) pp 141–164
17.
HutchesonJ DTaylorG A, 1973, “Religious variables, political system characteristics, and policy outputs in the American states”American Journal of Political Science17414–421
18.
JohnstonR J, 1982Geography and the State: An Essay in Political Geography (Macmillan, London)
19.
JonesJ P, 1983, “Parameter variation by the expansion method with tests for autocorrelation”Modeling and Simulation14853–857
20.
JonesJ P, 1984, “A spatially-varying parameter model of AFDC participation: Empirical analysis using the expansion method”The Professional Geographer36455–461
21.
KasperH, 1968, “Welfare payments and work incentive: Some determinants of the rate of general assistance payments”Journal of Human Resources386–110
22.
KodrasJ E, 1982The Geographic Perspective in Social Policy Evaluation: A Conceptual Approach with Application to the US Food Stamp Program PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
23.
KodrasJ E, 1983, “Regional contributions to growth in the Food Stamp Program: A spatially expanded difference model”Modeling and Simulation14621–626
24.
KodrasJ E, 1984, “Regional variation in the determinants of Food Stamp Program participation”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy267–78
25.
MacDonaldM, 1977Food, Stamps, and Income Maintenance (Academic Press, New York)
26.
PaddisonR, 1983The Fragmented State: The Political Geography of Power (St. Martin's Press, New York)
27.
PivenF FClowardR A, 1971Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare (Random House, New York)
28.
PlatkyL, 1977, “Aid to families with dependent children: An overview, October, 1977”Social Security Bulletin4017–22
29.
RobinsonK W, 1961, “Sixty years of federation in Australia”Geographical Review511–20
30.
SouthwickL, 1978, “Income transfers as a public good: Comment”American Economic Review57977–981
31.
SpallHMcGoughranE, 1974, “AFDC in Michigan in the twentieth century”Review of Social Economy3270–85
32.
SteinBAlbinP S, 1967, “The demand for general assistance payments: Comment”American Economic Review57575–585
33.
StonecashJHayesS W, 1981, “The sources of public policy: Welfare policy in the American states”Policy Studies Journal9681–698
34.
ThrallG I, 1981, “Regional dynamics of local government welfare expenditures”Urban Geography2255–268
35.
USDHHS, 1981Social Security Bulletin, Annual Statistical SupplementUS Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
36.
WalkerNTweetenL, 1973, “Determination of participation rates in major federally subsidized public assistance programs”Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal1027–35
37.
WinegardenC R, 1973, “The welfare explosion: Determinants of size and recent growth of the AFDC population”American Journal of Economics and Sociology32245–256
38.
WohlenbergE H, 1976a, “An index of eligibility standards for welfare benefits”The Professional Geographer28381–384
39.
WohlenbergE H, 1976b, “Interstate variations in AFDC programs”Economic Geography52254–266
40.
WohlenbergE H, 1976c, “Public assistance effectiveness by states”Annals of the Association of American Geographers66440–450
