It is explained that statistical problems over omitted variables and endogenous factors cast doubt upon the wisdom of attempting inference about many forms of human behaviour from cross-sectional data. Simulations are used to confirm that cross-sectional analyses can produce seriously misleading results. The problems are avoided by using longitudinal methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonP D, 1982, “Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories” in Sociological Methodology 1982 Ed. LeinhardtS (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) pp 61–97
2.
ClarkWAVHuffJ O, 1977, “Some empirical tests of duration-of-stay effects in intraurban migration”Environment and Planning A91357–1374
3.
DaviesR BCrouchleyR, 1984a, “Calibrating longitudinal models of residential mobility and migration: An assessment of a non-parametric marginal likelihood approach”Regional Science and Urban Economics14231–247
4.
DaviesR BCrouchleyR, 1984b, “Gender effects in voting behaviour” in Surrey Conferences on Theory and Method 2 Eds AblePProctorM (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 84–98
5.
DaviesR BCrouchleyR, 1985, “Control for omitted variables in the analysis of panel and other longitudinal data”Geographical Analysis171–15
6.
DaviesR BPicklesA R, 1984, “Accounting for omitted variables in a discrete time panel data model of residential mobility”Papers in Planning Research number 77; Department of Town Planning, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff CF1 3NU
7.
FestingerL, 1957A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
8.
FlinnC JHeckmanJ J, 1982, “Models for the analysis of labor force dynamics”Advances in Econometrics135–95
9.
HeckmanJ J, 1981, “Statistical models for discrete panel data” in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications Eds ManskiC FMcFaddenD (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 114–178
10.
HorowitzJ, 1980, “The accuracy of the multinomial logit model as an approximation to the multinomial probit model of travel demand”Transportation Research B14331–341
11.
JohnsonLHensherD, 1982, “Application of multinomial probit to a two-period panel data set”Transportation Research A16457–464
12.
KieferJWolfowitzJ, 1956, “Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many nuisance parameters”Annals of Mathematical Statistics27887–906
13.
LairdN, 1978, “Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution”Journal of the American Statistical Association73805–811
14.
LancasterTNickellS, 1980, “The analysis of re-employment probabilities for the unemployed”Journal of the Royal Statistical Association, Series A143141–165
15.
MillerE JO'KellyM E, 1983, “Estimating shopping destination choice models from travel diary data”Professional Geographer35440–449
16.
PicklesA RDaviesR B, 1984, “Recent developments in the analysis of movement and recurrent choice” in Spatial Statistics and Models Eds GaileG LWilmottC J (D Reidel, Dordrecht) pp 321–343
17.
PicklesA RDaviesR B, 1985, “The longitudinal analysis of housing careers”Journal of Regional Science2585–101
18.
QuigleyJ MWeinbergD H, 1977, “Intra-urban residential mobility: A review and synthesis”International Regional Science Review241–46
19.
ShortJ R, 1978, “Residential mobility”Progress in Human Geography2419–447
20.
TardiffT J, 1979, “Definition of alternatives and representation of dynamic behaviour in spatial choice models”Transportation Research Record72325–30
21.
WoodAHindeJ, 1985, “Binomial variance component models with nonparametric mixing distribution: A GLIM approach” paper presented to the Economic and Social Research Council sponsored conference on longitudinal data and life histories, University of Surrey, February 1985; forthcoming in Surrey Conferences on Theory and Method 3 Ed. CrouchleyR (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
