In this paper is reported an empirical comparison between two models of residential search behavior: a normative stopping model derived by Phipps and Laverty and a heuristic model proposed by Meyer. This normative rule is exemplary of a large class of models in economics in which it is assumed that individuals act as if they maximize rational expectations when making sequential decisions. The heuristic rule, in contrast, is exemplary of descriptive models in psychology in which it is assumed that such decisions are better characterized by a more simplified cognitive algebra. A comparison is made of the ability of the models to explain the behavior of subjects in an apartment search game. The results tend to favor the heuristic model: stopping appears best characterized by a set of individual-specific utility-difference thresholds. Implications of the results for the role of normative versus descriptive models in the development of residential search theory are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraunsteinY MSchotterA, 1982, “Labor market search: An experimental study”Economic Inquiry20133–144
2.
BrickmanP, 1972, “Optional stopping on ascending and descending series”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance753–62
3.
ClarkWAVFlowerdewR, 1982, “A review of search models and their application to search in the housing market” in Modelling Housing Market Search Ed. ClarkWAV (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 4–29
4.
CorbinR MOlsonC LAbbondanzaM, 1975, “Context effects in optional stopping decisions”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance14207–216
5.
DeGrootM, 1970Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York)
6.
EinhornH JHogarthR M, 1981, “Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgement and choice”Annual Review of Psychology3252–88
7.
FlowerdewR, 1976, “Search strategies and stopping rules in residential mobility”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series147–57
8.
GretherDWildeL, 1984, “An analysis of conjunctive choice: Theory and experiments”Journal of Consumer Research10373–385
9.
HelsonH, 1964Adaptation Level Theory (Harper and Row, New York)
10.
Iowa City Planning Office, 1975, “1975 Iowa City rental housing survey”Iowa City Planning Office, Iowa City, IA
11.
KahnemanDTverskyA, 1973, “On the psychology of prediction”Psychological Review80237–251
12.
KahnemanDTverskyA, 1979, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”Econometrica47263–291
13.
KamiESchwartzA, 1977, “Search theory: The case of search with uncertain recall”Journal of Economic Theory1638–52
14.
KohnM GShavellS, 1974, “The theory of search”Journal of Economic Theory993–123
15.
LippmanS AMcCallJ J, 1979Studies in the Economics of Search (North Holland, Amsterdam)
16.
LouviereJ J, 1979, “Modeling individual residential preferences: A totally disaggregate approach”Transportation Research A13374–384
17.
MeyerR, 1980, “A descriptive model of constrained residential search”Geographical Analysis1221–32
18.
MeyerR, 1982, “A descriptive model of consumer information search behavior”Marketing Science193–121
19.
MuthJ F, 1961, “Rational expectations and the theory of price movements”Econometrica24315–335
20.
NerloveM, 1983, “Expectations, plans, and realizations in theory and practice”Econometrica511–79
RapoportATverskyA, 1966, “Cost and accessibility of offers as determinants of optional stopping”Psychonomic Science4145–146
25.
RapoportATverskyA, 1970, “Choice behavior in an optional stopping task”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance5105–120
26.
SakaguchiM, 1961, “Dynamic programming of some sequential sampling designs”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications2446–466
27.
ShanteauJ, 1972, “Descriptive versus normative models of sequential inference judgement”Journal of Experimental Psychology9363–68
28.
ShapiraZVeneziaI, 1981, “Optional stopping on nonstationary series”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance2732–49
29.
SlovicPFischhoffBLichtensteinS, 1977, “Behavioral decision theory”Annual Review of Psychology281–39
30.
SmithT RClarkWAVHuffJ OShapiroP, 1979, “A decision-making and search model for intraurban migration”Geographical Analysis111–22
31.
SmithT RMertzF, 1980, “An analysis of the effects of information revision on the outcome of housing-market search, with special reference to the influence of realty agents”Environment and Planning A12155–174
32.
SmithT RPellegrinoJ WGolledgeR G, 1982, “Computational process modeling of spatial cognition and behavior”Geographical Analysis14305–325
33.
WeibullJ W, 1978, “A search model for microeconomic analysis—with spatial applications” in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models Eds KarlqvistALindqvistLSnickarsFWeibullJ W (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 47–73
