Although attempts have been made recently to include supply considerations in urban spatial interaction models, these efforts have not been comprehensive. In this paper, demand-type models are first examined. Then it is demonstrated how spatial consumption patterns can be determined when potential supply exceeds actual demand or vice versa. In addition, supply and demand imbalances are treated simultaneously. Last, a model for handling steady state supply–demand equilibrium is developed, which includes the effects of delays between customers entering the housing or land markets and finally making a choice. The case of uniform steady state supply is distinguished from that where new supply occurs at discrete intervals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattyM, 1978, “Speculations on an information theoretical approach to spatial representation” in Studies in Applied Regional Science, Volume 10: Spatial Representation and Spatial Interaction Eds MasserIBrownP, (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague) pp 115–147
2.
BertugliaC STadeiR, 1981, “An application to the Ticino Valley Park of a mathematical model”Science Association, Barcelona; available as WP-4, Istituto di Ricerche Economico–Sociali del Piemonte, Turin
3.
BoyceD EChonK SLeeY JLinK TLeBlancL J, 1983, “Implementation and computational issues for combined models of location, destination, mode, and route choice”Environment and Planning A151219–1229Umea, Sweden
4.
BrotchieJ F, 1978, “A model incorporating diversity in urban allocation problems”Applied Mathematical Modelling2191–200
BrotchieJ FRoyJ RSharpeR, 1981, “Urban impacts of technological change” paper presented at Conference on Structural Economic Planning in Time and Space, University of Umea, Sweden, 1981; copies available from the authors
7.
CesarioF J, 1973, “A note on the entropy model of trip distribution”Transportation Research7331–333
8.
DaceyM PNorcliffeA, 1976, “New entropy models in the social sciences. 1. Elementary residential-location models”Environment and Planning A8299–310
9.
ErlanderS, 1980Optimal Spatial Interaction and the Gravity Model (Springer, Berlin)
10.
FiskCBrownG R, 1975, “A note on the entropy formulation of distribution models”Operational Research Quarterly26755–758
11.
HarrisBWilsonA G, 1978, “Equilibrium values and dynamics of attractiveness terms in production-constrained spatial interaction models”Environment and Planning A10371–388
12.
LeonardiG, 1981, “A general accessibility and congestion-sensitive multiactivity spatial interaction model”Papers of the Regional Science Association473–17
13.
LesseP FBrotchieJ FRoyJ RSharpeR, 1978, “A new philosophy for regional modelling”Papers of the Third Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Section, Regional Science Association (Australian and New Zealand Section, Regional Science Association, Melbourne) pp 165–178
14.
RoyJ R, 1980, “External zones in the gravity model—some further developments”Environment and Planning A121203–1206
15.
RoyJ R, 1981, “A note on consistency of choice units in entropy models”Transportation Research B15159–164
16.
RoyJ RJohanssonB, 1984, “Planning and forecasting shop location and shopping travel” paper presented at Conference on Structural Economic Planning in Time and Space, University of Umeå, Sweden, 1981; to appear in Regional Science and Urban Economics 13(3) 1984
17.
RoyJ RLesseP F, 1981, “On appropriate microstate descriptions in entropy modelling”Transportation Research B1585–96
18.
SnickarsFWeibullJ W, 1977, “A minimum information principle: Theory and practice”Regional Science and Urban Economics7137–168
19.
WalshP KGibberdR W, 1980, “Developments of an entropy model for residential location with maximum zonal population constraints”Environment and Planning A121253–1268
20.
WebberM J, 1975, “Entropy-maximizing location models for nonindependent events”Environment and Planning A799–108
21.
WilsonA G, 1970Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Pion, London)
