The purpose of the paper is to provide an explanation for the shape of city-size distributions in the context of a central place system. Under given assumptions, a model is presented relating this distribution to individual labour productivity and individual consumption pattern. Simulation results show how variations in productivity and consumption explain the slope and curvature (primacy, convexity, S-shape) of city-size distributions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbergY, 1973, “Regional productivity differences in Swedish manufacturing”Regional and Urban Economics3131–156
2.
BeckmannMMcPhersonJ, 1970, “City size distribution in a central place hierarchy: An alternative approach”Journal of Regional Science1025–33
3.
BeguinH, 1982, “City-size distribution and central place models: A suggestion”Journal of Regional Science22225–239
4.
BeguinH, 1983, “City-size distribution, consumption structure, and labour productivity: Modeling and simulation results”Geographical Analysis15156–163
5.
CarlinoG, 1979, “Increasing returns to scale in metropolitan manufacturing”Journal of Regional Science19363–373
6.
CarrollG, 1982, “National city-size distributions: What do we know after 67 years of research?”Progress in Human Geography61–43
7.
EttlingerN, 1981, “Dependency and urban growth: A critical review and reformulation of the concepts of primacy and rank-size”Environment and Planning A131389–1400
8.
HainingR, 1980, “Intraregional estimation of central place population parameters”Journal of Regional Science20365–375
9.
HendersonJ, 1974, “The sizes and types of cities”American Economic Review64640–656
10.
HornRPrescottJ, 1978, “Central place models and the economic base: Some empirical results”Journal of Regional Science18229–241
11.
MillsE, 1967, “An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area”American Economic Review57197–210
12.
MulliganG, 1981, “Production functions, export base multipliers, and urbanization ratios in city systems”Papers of the Regional Science Association4877–88
13.
ParrJ, 1970, “Models of city size in an urban system”Papers of the Regional Science Association25221–253
14.
PumainD, 1982La Dynamique des Villes (Economica, Paris)
15.
RosenKResnickM, 1980, “The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy”Journal of Urban Economics8165–186
16.
SchaeferG, 1978, “Returns to scale and income distribution in urban areas in Saskatchewan”Journal of Regional Science18357–371
