A model is specified for predicting residential location, modal choice, and transportation system performance which is formulated as a convex programming problem. Two solution algorithms belonging to the class of feasible descent direction methods are proposed for solving this problem. Several extensions of the basic model are discussed and the associated solution algorithms are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchourDLapointeA, 1980“Modèle hédonique de détermination de la valeur des aménités résidentielles” working paper, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Montréal, Québec.
2.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
3.
AnasALeeG Y, 1980“The potential for a value capture policy to finance rapid transit projects in Chicago's southwest side: An empirical simulation analysis” working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
4.
AvrielM, 1976Nonlinear Programming—Analysis and Methods (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
5.
BregmanL, 1967“The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming”USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics7200–217.
6.
DucharmeR, 1980“Modèles de distribution avec contraintes d'inégalité: Calibration et résolution” publication 170, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec.
7.
ErlanderSNguyenSStewartN F, 1979“On the calibration of the combined distribution assigment model”Transportation Research B13(3) 259–267.
8.
EvansS P, 1976“Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment”Transportation Research1037–57.
9.
FlorianM, 1977“A traffic equilibrium model of travel by car and public transit modes”Transportation Science11166–179.
FlorianMNguyenSFerlandJ, 1975“On the combined distribution assignment of traffic”Transportation Science943–53.
12.
FlorianMChapleauRNguyenSAchimCJames-LefebvreLGalarneauSLefebvreJFiskC, 1979“Validations and application of EMME: An equilibrium based two-mode urban transportation planning method”Transportation Research Record72814–22.
13.
FrankC, 1978A Study of Alternative Approaches to Combined Trip Distribution Assignment ModellingPhD thesis, Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
FrankMWolfeP, 1956“An algorithm for quadratic programming”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly395–110.
15.
HarrisB, 1976“A code for the transportation problem of linear programming”Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery23155–157.
16.
HårsmanBSnickarsF, 1975“Disaggregated housing demand models: Some theoretical approaches”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association34121–143.
17.
HerbertD JStevensB H, 1960“A model for the distribution of residential activity in urban areas”Journal of Regional Science221–36.
18.
JeffersonT RScottC H, 1979“The analysis of entropy models with equality and inequality constraints”Transportation Research B13123–132.
19.
LamondBStewartN F, 1981“Bregman's balancing method”Transportation Research B15(4) 239–248.
20.
LebeufRJörnstenKStewartN F, 1980“On the use of Bregman's balancing method for the solution of relaxed distribution problems” publication 353, Département d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec.
21.
LosM, 1979a“Combined residential location and transportation models”Environment and Planning A111241–1265.
22.
LosM, 1979b“Determining modal choice and station choice for a rail transit line”The Logistics and Transportation Review15335–358.
23.
MacKinnonJ G, 1980“Solving urban general equilibrium models by fixed point methods” in Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points Ed. RobinsonS M, (Academic Press, New York) pp 197–212.
24.
SeniorM LWilsonA G, 1974“Explorations and syntheses of linear programming and spatial interaction models of residential location”Geographical Analysis6209–238.
25.
WheatonW, 1974“Linear programming and locational equilibrium: The Herbert-Stevens model revisited”Journal of Urban Economics1278–287.
26.
ZangwillW I, 1969Nonlinear Programming: A Unified Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
