AsdalK, 2008a, “On politics and the little tools of democracy: A down-to-earth-approach”Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory9(1) 11–26
2.
AsdalK, 2008b, “Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing”Geoforum39123–132
3.
AsdalK, 2011, “The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority”Accounting, Organizations and Society361–9
4.
AsdalK, 2014, “From climate issue to oil issue: Offices of public administration, versions of economics, and the ordinary technologies of politics”Environment and Planning A462110–2124
5.
BarryA, 2006, “Technological zones”European Journal of Social Theory9239–253
6.
BlokA, 2007, “Experts on public trial: On democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference”Public Understanding of Science16163–182
7.
BlokA, 2014, “Articulating social science in the wild of global natures? On economics and anthropology in transnational environmental politics”Environment and Planning A462125–2142
8.
BraunB, (Ed.), “Futures: Imagining socio-ecological transformation”Annals of the Association of American Geographers special issue, forthcoming
9.
BraunBCastreeN, (Eds), 1998Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium (Routledge, London)
10.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34535–548
11.
CallonMMilloYMuniesaF, 2007, “An introduction to market devices”, in Market Devices Eds CallonMMilloYMuniesaF, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 1–39
12.
CastreeN, 2003, “Environmental issues: Relational ontologies and hybrid politics”Progress in Human Geography27203–211
13.
DerksenMVikkelsøSBeaulieuA, 2012, “Social technologies: Cross-disciplinary reflections on technologies in and from the social sciences”Theory and Psychology22139–147
14.
GabrysJ, 2014, “A cosmopolitics of energy: Diverging materialities and hesitating practice”Environment and Planning A462095–2109
15.
HawkinsG, 2011, “Packaging water: Plastic bottles as market and public devices”Economy and Society40534–552
16.
HinchliffeS, 2001, “Indeterminacy in-decisions—science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26182–204
17.
HinchliffeSLevidowLOreszczynS, 2014, “Engaging cooperative research”Environment and Planning A462080–2094
18.
Knorr-CetinaK, 1995, “Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science”, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies Eds JasanoffSMarkleG EPetersenJ CPinchT, (Sage, London) pp 140–166
19.
LatourB, 2004Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Harvard University Press, London)
20.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1979Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
21.
LawJ, 2004After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (Routledge, London)
22.
LezaunJSonerydL, 2007, “Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics”Public Understanding of Science16279–297
23.
MacKenzieD, 2009, “Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets”Accounting, Organizations and Society34440–455
24.
MarresN, 2011, “The costs of public involvement: Everyday devices of carbon accounting and the materialization of participation”Economy and Society40510–533
25.
MarresN, 2012Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
26.
MarresN, 2013, “Why political ontology must be experimentalized: On eco-show homes as devices of participation”Social Studies of Science43417–443
27.
MichaelM, 2012, “De-signing the object of sociology: Toward an 'idiotic'methodology”The Sociological Review60(S1) 166–183
28.
MoorLLuryC, 2011, “Making and measuring value: Comparison, singularity and agency in brand valuation practice”Journal of Cultural Economy4439–454
29.
MuniesaFMilloYCallonM, 2007, “An introduction to market devices”, in The Sociological Review55(S2) 1–12
30.
MurphyM, 2006Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
31.
NeylandDWoolgarS, 2013Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
OberschallA, 1965Empirical Social Research in Germany 1848–1914 (Mouton, Paris)
33.
OberschallA, 1972The Establishment of Empirical Sociology: Studies in Continuity, Discontinuity and Institutionalization (Harper and Row, New York)
34.
OsborneTRoseN, 1999, “Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research”The British Journal of Sociology50367–396
35.
SavageM, 2010Identities and Social Change in Britain Since 1940: The Politics of Method (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
36.
SchickLWinthereikB R, 2013, “Innovating relations—or why smart grid is not too complex for the public”Science and Technology Studies26(3) 82–102
37.
SundqvistG, 2014, “‘Heating up’ or ‘cooling down’? Analysing and performing broadened participation in technoscientific conflicts”Environment and Planning A462065–2079
38.
TonkissF, 2004, “Trust and social capital”, in Politics, Trust and Networks: Social Capital in Critical Perspectives Ed. FranklinJ, (London South Bank University, London) pp 17–22
39.
TurnerS, 2003Liberal Democracy 3.0: Civil Society in an Age of Experts (Sage, London)
40.
VerranH, 2012, “Number”, in Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social Eds LuryCWakefordC, (Routledge, London) pp 110–124
WhatmoreSLandströmC, 2011, “Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public”Economy and Society40582–610
43.
WynneB, 2010, “Strange weather, again”Theory, Culture and Society27289–305
44.
YusoffK, 2013. “Insensible worlds: Postrelational ethics, indeterminacy and the (k)nots of relating”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31208–226
