The analysis of political change in Britain has been dominated by the swing. The swing is inadequate because it measures only a relationship between changes in party support and sheds no light on the processes of political change. This paper critically examines the swing concept and suggests an alternative standardised measure which eliminates a number of problems associated with the use of the swing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerringtonH B, 1965“The general election of 1964”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society128A17–51
2.
ButlerD E, 1952The British General Election of1951 (Macmillan, London)
3.
ButlerD E, 1953The Electoral System in Britain 1918–1951 (Oxford University Press, London)
4.
ButlerD E, 1955The British General Election of1955 (Macmillan, London)
5.
ButlerD E, 1965“A comment on Professor Rasmussen's article”Parliamentary Affairs18455–457
6.
ButlerD EKavanaghD, 1975The British General Election of October1974 (Macmillan, London)
7.
ButlerD EStokesD E, 1974Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice (Macmillan, London)
8.
GrayP GCorlettTFranklandP, 1950The Register of Electors as a Sampling Frame (Central Office of Information, London)
9.
JohnstonR J, 1979“Regional variations in the 1979 general election results for England”Area11294–297
10.
KendallM GStuartA, 1950“The law of cubic proportions in election results”British Journal of Sociology1183–197
11.
LemieuxP H, 1977“Political issues and Liberal support in the February 1974, British general election”Political Studies25323–342
12.
LewisP WSkipworthG E, 1966“Some geographical and statistical aspects of the distribution of votes in recent general elections” miscellaneous series 3, Department of Geography, University of Hull, Hull, England
13.
MaherC A, 1974“Spatial patterns in urban housing markets: Filtering in Toronto, 1953–1971”Canadian Geographer18108–124
14.
MillerW L, 1972“Measures of electoral change using aggregate data”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society135A122–142
15.
RasmussenJ, 1965“The disutility of the swing concept in British psephology”Parliamentary Affairs18442–454
16.
SteedM, 1965“An analysis of the results” in The British General Election of 1964 Eds ButlerD EKingA (Macmillan, London) pp 337–359
17.
SteedM, 1966“An analysis of the results” in The British General Election of 1966 Eds ButlerD EKingA (Macmillan, London) pp 271–295
18.
SteedM, 1971“An analysis of the results” in The British General Election of 1970 Eds ButlerD EPinto-DuschinskyM (Macmillan, London) pp 386–415
19.
SteedM, 1974“The results analysed” in The British General Election of February 1974 Eds ButlerD EKavanaghD (Macmillan, London) pp 313–339
20.
SteedM, 1975“The results analysed” in The British General Election of October 1974 Eds ButlerD EKavanaghD (Macmillan, London) pp 330–356
21.
TaylorP J, 1979“The changing geography of representation in Britain”Area11289–294
