An analysis is made of the consequences of some extensions of a residential location model on the performance of the model. These extensions are disaggregation, quasidynamics, and the introduction of external zones. The model is calibrated for the Amersfoort region, and the results are compared with home-survey data for 1975.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnthonyJBaxterR, 1971“The first stage in disaggregating the residential sub-model” WP-58, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
2.
BattyM, 1976Urban Modelling: Algorithms, Calibrations, Predictions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
3.
BattyM, 1978“Urban models in the planning process” in Geography and the Urban Environment Eds HerbertD TJohnstonR J (John Wiley, New York) pp 63–135
4.
BaxterRWilliamsJ, 1973“The third stage in disaggregating the residential sub-model” WP-66, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
5.
de JongT, 1978“Oplossingsperikelen bij een gedisaggregeerd woonallokatiemodel met externe zones” rapport 4 onderzoek woonallokatiemodellen, Geografisch Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands
6.
Dutch Census, 1971Census of Population 1971 (Central Bureau of Statistics, 's-Gravenhage, The Netherlands)
7.
FloorHde JongT, 1981“Ontwikkeling en toetsing van een woonallocatiemodel” Utrechtse Geografische Studies 22, Geografisch Instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands
8.
HymanG, 1969“The calibration of trip distribution parameters”Environment and Planning1105–112
9.
MackettR L, 1974“A residential location model incorporating spatially varying levels of information”Regional Studies8257–265
10.
MasserF I, 1978“A framework for policy oriented home-work trip analysis” WP-11, Instituut voor Planologie, Utrecht, The Netherlands
11.
MasserF I, 1979“A note on the treatment of flows across system boundaries in spatial interaction models”Environment and Planning A11447–584
12.
MasserF IBateyP W JBrownP J B, 1975“The design of zoning systems for interaction models” in London Papers in Regional Science 5: Regional Science—New Concepts and Old Problems Ed. CrippsE L (Pion, London) pp 166–187
13.
OpenshawS, 1977“Optimal zoning systems for spatial interaction models”Environment and Planning A9169–184
14.
SeniorM L, 1973“Approaches to residential location modelling: Urban ecological and spatial interaction models”Environment and Planning5165–197
15.
SeniorM LWilsonA G, 1972“Disaggregated residential location models, some tests and further theoretical developments” WP-22, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
16.
WilsonA G, 1970Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Ron, London)
17.
WilsonA G, 1974Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
