Abstract
The problem of validating a given unidimensional scale (that is, an ordering of a set of objects along a single dimension) is discussed in terms of a few simple properties of the data used to obtain the scale. Based on a set of asymmetric proximity values as raw data, a distinction between analyzing absolute-value information or sign information is presented that leads to a formal test of whether a given scale is being reliably represented. In short, a scale is generated from absolute-value information, but validated through sign information. A numerical example which deals with the perception of homicide rate over fifteen of the largest Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas is included as an illustration of the general methodological discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.