This paper investigates the effect of proximity on attitudes towards mental illness. One outcome of the policies referred to as deinstitutionalization is an overall reduction in the social and geographical distance between members of the public and the mentally ill. For deinstitutionalization to be successful, it is important that residents in impacted communities become more accepting, both in a passive and in an active sense. A survey was made of residents in two neighborhoods of the city of Norman, Oklahoma, one of which was adjacent to a large mental health facility. In a causal model framework, the relationship between proximity and public attitudes is investigated; and the results suggest an important and significant relationship. The implications of the study for public education campaigns about mental illness, and for facility location strategies, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ G, 1973“Causal models and social indicators: toward the development of social systems models”American Sociological Review38285–301
2.
ArnhoffF N, 1975“Social consequences of policy toward mental illness”Science1881277–1281
3.
AviramUSegalS P, 1973“Exclusion of the mentally ill”Archives of General Psychiatry29126–131
4.
BachrachL L, 1976Deinstitutionalization: An Analytical Review and Sociological Perspective Series D, number 4 (National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md)
5.
BaronR C, 1978“Community opposition to the mentally ill and the strategies that respond”paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the International Association of the Psycho-Social Rehabilitation Services, November; available on request from Horizon House Institute, Philadelphia, Pa
6.
BaronR CRutmanI D, 1979“These people: a citizen education project examining public response to community care for the mentally disabled” unpublished report, Horizon House Institute for Research and Development, Philadelphia, Pa
7.
BassukE LGersonS, 1978“Deinstitutionalization and mental health services”Scientific American12846–53
BradleyV J, 1978Deinstitutionalization of Developmentally Disabled Persons: A Conceptual Analysis and Guide (University Park Press, Baltimore, Md)
10.
ChuF DTrotterS, 1974The Madness Establishment (Grossman, New York)
11.
ClarkA WBinksN M, 1966“Relation of age and education to attitudes toward mental illness”Psychological Reports19649–650
12.
DearM, 1977“Psychiatric patients in the inner city”Annals of the Association of American Geographers67558–594
13.
DearM, 1978“Planning for mental health care: a reconsideration of public facility location theory”International Regional Science Review393–111
14.
DixonC R, 1967“Courses on psychology and student's attitudes toward mental illness”Psychological Reports2950
15.
DohrenwendB PChin-ShongE, 1967“Social status and attitudes toward psychological disorder: the problem of tolerance of deviance”American Sociological Review32417–433
16.
FreemanH E, 1961“Attitudes toward mental illness among relatives of former patients”American Sociological Review2659–66
17.
General Accounting Office, 1976“Returning the mentally disabled to the community: Government needs to do more” Comptroller General's Report to the Congress, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC
18.
HeinemannS HPerlmutterFYudinL W, 1974“The community mental health center and community awareness”Community Mental Health Journal10221–227
19.
HolmesD, 1968“Changes in attitudes about mental illness” mimeograph, Center for Community Research, New York
20.
KaplanS, 1973“Cognitive maps in perception and thought”Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior Eds DownsR MSteaD (Aldine, Chicago) pp 63–78
21.
KaplanS, 1975“An informal model for the prediction of preference”Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources Eds ZubeE HBrushR OFabosJ G (Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsberg, Pa) pp 92–101
22.
KirkS A, 1974“The impact of labeling on rejection of the mentally ill: an experimental study”Journal of Health and Social Behavior15108–117
23.
MulfordC LMurphyJ B, 1968“Selected correlates of the stigma associated with mental illness”Journal of Social Psychology74103–110
24.
MuracoW AVeznerK OKingJ A, 1977“Deconcentration of community mental health services under the constraint of concentrated geographic demand”Journal of the American Institute of Planners43371–379
25.
OrcuttJ DCairlR E, 1976“Neighborhood reactions to a community-based treatment center for alcoholics”Journal of Studies in Alcohol37619–631
26.
O'RiordanT, 1977Environmentalism (Pion, London)
27.
RabkinJ G, 1972“Opinions about mental illness: a review of the literature”Psychological Bulletin77153–171
28.
RabkinJ G, 1974“Public attitudes toward mental illness: a review of the literature”Schizophrenia Bulletinissue 10 (fall) 9–33
29.
RothbartM, 1973“Perceiving social injustice: observations on the relationship between liberal attitudes and proximity to social problems”Journal of Applied Social Psychology3291–302
30.
ScullA T, 1977Decarceration: Community Treatment of the Deviant—A Radical View (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ)
31.
SearsD OMcConahayJ B, 1973The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riot (Houghton Mifflin, Boston)
32.
SegalS P, 1978“Attitudes toward the mentally ill: a review”Social Work23211–217
33.
ShapiroT, 1979“Centralized versus decentralized CMHC's: is there a difference?”Innovations638
34.
SmithC J, 1976“Distance and the location of community mental health facilities: a divergent viewpoint”Economic Geography53181–191
35.
SmithC J, 1977“Geography and mental health” resource paper 76–4, Association of American Geographers, Commission on College Geography, Washington, DC
36.
SmithC J, 1979“Perspectives on deinstitutionalization” in A Place to Call Home: Perspectives on Deinstitutionalization of the Mentally Ill Proceedings of a Conference in Oklahoma City, October 1979, Mental Health Association in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City, Okla, pp 1–6; a copy may be obtained from the author (CJS)
37.
SmithC J, 1980a“Optimum living environments for discharged mental patients” in Optimizing Environments: Research, Practice, and Policy Proceedings of the Environmental Design and Research Association 11 Conference, Charleston, SC, March, 1980; a copy may be obtained from the author (CJS)
38.
SmithC J, 1980b“Residential proximity and community acceptancy of the mentally ill”Journal of Operational Psychiatry (forthcoming)
39.
TaylorS MDearMHallG B, 1980“Attitudes toward the mentally ill and reactions to mental health facilities”Social Science and Medicine13D281–290
40.
US Bureau of the Census, 1972Block Statistics for Oklahoma City, 1970. Census of Housing (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
WolchJ R, 1979“Residential location and the provision of human services: some directions for geographic research”The Professional Geographer31271–277
43.
WolfensbergerW, 1974“Will there always be an institution? The impact of new service models”Mental Retardation931–37
44.
WolpertJMumphreyASeleyJ, 1972“Metropolitan neighborhoods: participation and conflict over change” resource paper 16, Association of American Geographers, Commission on College Geography, Washington, DC
45.
WolpertJWolpertE, 1976“The relocation of released mental patients into residential communities”Policy Sciences1731–51
46.
ZdorkowskiGSmithC J, 1976“Location and stigma: public attitudes to community based criminal treatment centers” paper read at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, New York, April, 1976
