The conventional concept of linear progression through a traditional life cycle underlies much of social science theory. The utility of retaining the traditional life-cycle framework has declined rapidly as patterns of family and nonfamily structure and behavior have become more diversified. A more comprehensive framework which encompasses these new household types is suggested. The utility of this expanded life-cycle model is explored, with particular reference to single-headed family households and primary households.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtS LBahrH MChadwickB A, 1979“Changing family sex roles: An assessment of age differences”Journal of Marriage and the Family41(1) 41–50
2.
BaerwaldtN AMorganJ N, 1971“Trends in intra-family transfers” Working Paper, OEO Study of Family Income Dynamics, Office of Economic Opportunity, Washington, DC
3.
BeckerG S, 1973“A theory of marriage: Part I”Journal of Political Economy81(4) 813–846
4.
BeckerG S, 1974“A theory of marriage: Part II”Journal of Political Economy82(2) S11–S26
5.
BednarzikR WKleinD P, 1977“Labor force trends: A synthesis and analysis”Monthly Labor Review100(10) 3–12
6.
BerryB J LKasardaJ D, 1977Contemporary Urban Ecology (Macmillan, New York)
7.
BlakeJ, 1974“The changing status of women in developed countries”Scientific American231(3) 137–147
8.
BloodR OWolfeD M, 1960Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Family Living (Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.)
9.
BodenheimerB M, 1975“The rights of children and the crisis in custody litigation”University of Colorado Law Review46495
10.
BourneL S, 1968“Market location and site selection in apartment construction”Canadian Geographer12211–226
11.
BrandweinR A, 1977“After divorce: A focus on single parent families”The Urban and Social Change Review10(1) 21–25
12.
BrandweinR ABrownC AFoxE M, 1974“Women and children last: The social situation of divorced mothers and their families”Journal of Marriage and the Family36498–514
13.
BrownG D, 1978“Discrimination and pay disparities between white men and women”Monthly Labor Review101(3) 17–22
14.
CainG CDooleyM D, 1976“Estimation of a model of labor supply, fertility, and wages of married women”Journal of Political Economy84(4) S191–S194
15.
CarlinerG, 1975“Determinants of household headship”Journal of Marriage and the Family37 (February) 28–39
16.
CarterHGlickP, 1970Marriage and Divorce (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass)
17.
ChevanAKorsonH, 1972“The widowed who live alone: An examination of social and demographic forces”Social Forces5445–53
18.
Citizens Advisory Council on the Status of Women, 1972Report, Wisconsin
19.
CromwellR EOlsonD H, 1975Power in Families (Halstead Press, New York)
20.
FreedD JFosterH, 1973“Economic effects of divorce”Family Law Quarterly7275
21.
FreyW H, 1978“Mover's life-cycle stage and choice of destination neighborhood: Implications for urban social structure” in Studies in Geography 25. Population Mobility and Residential Change Eds ClarkW A VMooreE M, Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., pp 99–148
22.
GlickP, 1957American Families (John Wiley, New York)
23.
GlickP C, 1977“Updating the life cycle of the family”Journal of Marriage and the Family395–13
24.
GlickP C, 1979“The future of the American family”Current Population Reports, Series P-23, number 78US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
25.
GlickP CNortonA J, 1973“Perspectives on the recent upturn in divorce and remarriage”Demography10(3) 201–214
26.
GlickP CNortonA J, 1977“Marrying, divorcing, and living together in the US today”Population Bulletin32(5)
27.
GraffT OWisemanR F, 1978“Changing concentrations of older Americans”The Geographical Review68379–393
28.
GrossmanA S, 1976“Children of working mothers: March, 1976”Monthly Labor Review100(6) 41–44
29.
HallF SHallD T, 1979The Two Career Couple (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass)
30.
HamptonR, 1975“Marital disruption: Some social and economic consequences” in Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, volume 3 Eds DuncanG JMorganJ N, (Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.) pp 163–187
31.
HansonSHansonP, 1978“The impact of women's employment on household travel patterns: A Swedish example” paper presented at the United States Department of Transportation Conference on Women's Travel Issues: Research Needs and Priorities, Washington, DC, September 1978
32.
HaskinsR, 1979“Day care and public policy”The Urban and Social Change Review12(1) 3–10
33.
HaygheH, 1979“Marital and family characteristics of workers, March, 1977”Special Labor Force Report, 216US Bureau of Labor, Washington, DC
34.
HerzogESudiaC E, 1971Boys in Fatherless FamiliesUS Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Childrens Bureau, Washington, DC
35.
HillRRodgersR H, 1964“The developmental approach” in Handbook of Marriage and the Family Ed. ChristensenH T, (Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill.) pp 171–211
36.
HoffmanSHolmesJ, 1976“Husbands, wives, and divorce” in Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, volume 4 Eds DuncanG JMorganJ N, (Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.) pp 23–76
37.
JamesE, 1975“Effects of Women's Liberation” in Sex Discrimination and the Division of Labor Ed. LloydC B, (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 379–400
38.
JohnsonB L, 1978“Women who head families, 1970–1977”Monthly Labor Review101(2) 32–37
39.
JohnsonB, 1979“Changes in marital and family characteristics of workers, 1970–1978”Monthly Labor Review102(4) 49–52
KobrinF E, 1976“The fall in household size and the rise of the primary individual in the United States”Demography13(1) 127–138
42.
KriesbergL, 1970Mothers in Poverty (Aldine, Chicago, Ill.)
43.
LansingJ BCliftonC WMorganJ N, 1969New Homes and Poor People: A Study of Chains of MovesInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
44.
LevingerG, 1965“Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrate review”Journal of Marriage and the Family2719–28
45.
LloydC B, (Ed.), 1975Sex Discrimination and the Division of Labor (Columbia University Press, New York)
46.
ManningI, 1978The Journey to Work (Allen and Unwin, Boston, Mass)
47.
MarschallP MGatzM J, 1975“The custody decision process”North Carolina Central Law Journal750
48.
MincerJ, 1962“Labor force participation of married women: A study of labor supply”Aspects of Labor Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 63–97
49.
MooreK ASawhillI V, 1976Women and the American Economy (Columbia University Press, New York)
50.
National Center for Social Statistics (NCSS), 1977“Public assistance statistics, December, 1977”US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
51.
NockS L, 1979“The family life cycle: Empirical or conceptual tool?”Journal of Marriage and the Family41(1) 15–26
52.
PampelF CCholdinH M, 1978“Urban location and segregation of the aged: A block level analysis”Social Forces561121–1139
53.
PapanekH, 1973“Men, women and work: Reflections on the two person career”American Journal of Sociology78852–872
54.
PhilliberW WHillerD V, 1979“A research note: Occupational attainments and perceptions of status among working wives”Journal of Marriage and the Family41(1) 59–62
55.
RossH LSawhillI V, 1975Time of Transition (The Urban Institute, Washington, DC)
56.
RossiP, 1955Why Families Move (The Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.)
57.
SandellS H, 1977“Women and the economics of family migration”The Review of Economics and Statistics59406–414
58.
SawhillI V, 1976“Discrimination and poverty among women who head families”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society1(3) 201–212
59.
ScanzoniJ, 1970Opportunity and the Family (The Free Press, New York)
60.
ShawL B, 1978Economic Consequences of Marital Disruption for Women in their Middle YearsCenter for Human Resource Research, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
61.
SimmonsJ W, 1968“Changing residence in the city: A review of intra-urban mobility”Geographical Review58(4) 622–651
62.
SpereA, 1970“Home ownership, life cycle stage, and residential mobility”Demography7449–458
63.
StapletonC M, 1978“Geography of primary individuals” paper presented at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting, April, New Orleans, La
64.
StapletonC M, 1979“Spatial distribution of primary individuals” WP 79–3, University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
65.
SweetJ A, 1973“Differentials in remarriage probabilities” WP 73–29, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
66.
SzalaiA, 1973“The quality of family life—traditional and modern: A review of sociological findings on contemporary family organization and role differentiation in the family” paper presented at the UN Interregional Seminar on the Family in a Changing Society, London, 18–31 July
67.
ThorntonA, 1975“Decomposing the remarriage process”Population Studies31(2) 383–392
68.
US Bureau of the Census, 1976“Daytime care of children, October, 1976, and February, 1975”Current Population Reports, P-20, number 298US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
69.
US Bureau of the Census, 1978a“Money income in 1976 of families and persons in the United States”Current Population Reports, P-60, number 114US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
70.
US Bureau of the Census, 1978b“Money income and poverty status of families and persons in the US: 1977”Current Population Reports, P-60, number 116US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
71.
US Bureau of the Census, 1979a“Characteristics of the population below the poverty level: 1977”Current Population Reports, P-60, number 119US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
72.
US Bureau of the Census, 1979b“Household and family characteristics: March, 1978”Current Population Reports, P-20, number 338US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
73.
US Bureau of the Census, 1979c“Mobility of the population of the United States, March 1975 to March 1978”Current Population Reports, P-20, number 33US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC
74.
US Housing and Urban Development, 1978“How well are we housed? 2. Female-headed households”Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC
75.
US League of Savings Associations, 1978aHome Ownership—Affording the Single Family HomeUS League of Savings Associations, Chicago, Ill.
76.
US League of Savings Associations, 1978bHome Ownership—Realizing the American DreamUS League of Savings Associations, Chicago, Ill.
77.
US Public Health Service, 1978Divorce and Divorce Rates, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 21, number 29US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Hyattsville, Md
78.
VanckJ, 1974“Time spent in housework”Scientific American231(5) 116–120
79.
VickeryC, 1978“Economics and the single mother”Public Welfare3618–21
80.
WeitzmanL J, 1974“Legal regulation of marriage: Tradition and change”California Law Review621169
81.
WhitehurstR N, 1975“Alternative life-styles”Humanist3523–26
82.
WilliamsK MKuhnR P, 1973Remarriages, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 21, number 25US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Hyattsville, Md
83.
WinstonM PForsherR, 1971Non-support of Legitimate Children by Affluent Fathers as a Cause of Poverty and Welfare Dependence (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.)
