The fundamental assumption about the timing of moves in Markov, semi-Markov, and other renewal-theoretic models of residential mobility—that the intervals between moves are statistically independent—is tested using residence histories of Norwegian men, 1965–1971. The evidence strongly supports the assumption. It is shown that, given basic model parameters, predictions of duration-of-residence distributions are quite accurate; and, conversely, duration-of-residence data can be used in conjunction with the independence assumption to estimate model parameters. The implication of these findings for the design of mobility studies is discussed, and a question raised as to the necessity of gathering detailed histories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarlowR EBartholomewD JBremerJ MBrunkH D, 1972Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions (John Wiley, New York)
2.
ÇinlarE, 1969“Markov renewal theory”Advances in Applied Probability1123–187
3.
FellerW, 1964“On semi-Markov processes”Proceedings of the National Academy of Science51653–659
4.
FienbergS E, 1975“Comment on S M McKinlay, the design and analysis of the observational study”Journal of the American Statistical Association70521–523
5.
GehanE A, 1975“Statistical methods for survival time studies” in Cancer Therapy: Prognostic Factors and Criteria of Response Ed. StaquetM, (Raven Press, New York) pp 7–35
6.
GehanE ASiddiquiM, 1973“Simple regression methods for survival time studies”Journal of the American Statistical Association62843–856
7.
GinsbergR B, 1971“Semi-Markov processes and mobility”Journal of Mathematical Sociology1233–262
8.
GinsbergR B, 1972“Critique of probabilistic models: Application of the semi-Markov model to migration”Journal of Mathematical Sociology263–82
9.
GinsbergR B, 1976“Times between moves in stochastic models of migration histories, part I: Theory and analysis of time till first move, Norway, 1965–1971” paper presented at the 16th European Regional Science Conference, Copenhagen, August 1976
10.
GinsbergR B, 1978a“Probability models of residence histories: Analysis of times between moves” in Northwestern Studies in Geography 24. Population Mobility and Residential Change Eds ClarkW A VMooreE G, (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.) pp 233–265
11.
GinsbergR B, 1978b“The relationship between timing of moves and choice of destination in stochastic models of migration”Environment and Planning A10667–679
12.
GinsbergR B, 1979a“Timing and duration effects in residential histories and other longitudinal data, I: Stochastic and statistical models”Regional Science and Urban Economics9 (forthcoming); a preliminary version is available as Fels Discussion Paper 120, School of Public and Urban Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
13.
GinsbergR B, 1979b“Timing and duration effects in residential histories and other longitudinal data, II: Studies of duration effects in Norway, 1965–1971”Regional Science and Urban Economics9 (forthcoming); a preliminary version is available as Fels Discussion Paper 121, School of Public and Urban Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
14.
GinsbergR B, 1979cStochastic Models of Migration (North-Holland, Amsterdam) forthcoming
15.
KennedyAGehanE, 1971“Computerized simple regression methods for survival time studies”Computer Programs in Biomedicine1235–244
16.
McGinnisR, 1968“A stochastic model of social mobility”American Sociological Review33712–721
17.
PearsonE SHartleyH O, 1956Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Volume 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
18.
SingerBSpilermanS, 1975“The representation of social processes by Markov models” DP-262-75, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
