Six methods of parameter estimation for the production-constrained gravity model are compared in the context of interurban consumer travel. Monte-Carlo experiments reveal that the nonlinear methods (Batty and Mackie, 1972) are inferior to the linear methods (Nakanishi and Cooper, 1974) when there is specification error present, but that the latter rapidly lose their advantage as sample sizes decrease. Bias in the parameter estimates is a more serious source of error than sampling variation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattyMMackieS, 1972“The calibration of gravity, entropy, and related models of spatial interaction”Environment and Planning4205–233
2.
BultezA VNaertP A, 1975“Consistent sum constrained models”Journal of the American Statistical Association70529–535
3.
CesarioF J, 1975“Linear and nonlinear models of spatial interaction”Economic Geography5169–77
4.
EwingG O, 1974“Gravity and linear regression models of spatial interaction: a cautionary note”Economic Geography5083–88
5.
GinsbergR B, 1972“Incorporating causal structure and exogenous information with probabilistic models: with special reference to choice, gravity, migration, and Markov chains”Journal of Mathematical Sociology283–103
6.
GoodchildM F, 1975“Fitting the general spatial interaction model to recreational trip data”Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada (mimeo)
7.
HimmelblauD M, 1972Applied Nonlinear Programming (McGraw-Hill, New York)
8.
HuffD L, 1963“A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas”Land Economics3981–89
9.
IMSL, 1975Library 1 Reference Manual, Edition 5 (International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Houston)
10.
KingL J, 1962“A quantitative expression of the pattern of urban settlements in selected areas of the United States”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie531–7
11.
MaranzanaF E, 1964“On the location of supply points to minimize transport costs”Operational Research Quarterly15261–270
12.
MarsagliaGMacLarenM DBrigT A, 1964“A fast procedure for generating normal random variables”Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery74–10
13.
NakanishiMCooperL G, 1974“Parameter estimation for a multiplicative competitive interaction model—least squares approach”Journal of Marketing Research11303–311
14.
RushtonGGolledgeRClarkW A V, 1967“Formulation and test of a normative model for the spatial allocation of grocery expenditures by a dispersed population”Annals of the Association of American Geographers57389–400
15.
ServiceJ, 1972A User's Guide to the Statistical Analysis System (Student Supply Stores, North Carolina State University, Raleigh)
16.
SmithT E, 1975“A choice theory of spatial interaction”Regional Science and Urban Economics5137–176
17.
WilsonA G, 1971“A family of spatial interaction models”Environment and Planning31–32
