Analysis of a data set consisting of questionnaire interviews with actual and potential emergency patients in Montreal revealed that patterns of hospital choice for minor accidents and illnesses differ markedly in hypothetical- and observed-choice situations. General agreement at the aggregate level tends to conceal a variety of behaviour patterns among individuals and subgroups. It is suggested that decision rules derived from observation of actual choice behaviour are more consistent and reliable for planning use than are responses to hypothetical-choice questions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GolledgeRRushtonG, 1972Multidimensional Scaling: Review and Geographical Applications (Association of American Geographers, TP-10, Washington, DC)
2.
GuttmanL, 1968“A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points”Psychometrika33469–506
3.
KulkaT, 1975Spatial Perception and Preferences of SkiersMA thesis, Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal
4.
MartinJ C, 1972Rapport du Comité d'Étude sur les Services des Consultations Externes et des Urgences de la Région de Montréal (Association des Hôpitaux de la Province de Québec, Quebec)
5.
MassamBBrooksSBouchardD, 1974“The analysis of movement patterns: an example using Montreal healthcare data”Area6 (3) 174–179
6.
McDonaldA DMcDonaldJ CSteinmetzNEnterlineP ESalterV, 1973“Physician service in Montreal before universal health insurance”Medical Care11269–286
7.
RoskamELingoesJ C, 1970“MINISSA-I: a FORTRAN IV(G) program for the smallest space analysis of square symmetric matrices”Behavioral Science15204–205
8.
RossJ, 1972A Measure of Site AttractionPhD thesis, Geography Department, University of Western Ontario, Ontario
