Environmental planners frequently make decisions about projects which cost lives. The rational calculation of the optimal sacrifice of human life requires that such lives be made commensurate with all other factors relevant to the project under consideration. The measure most favoured by decision makers in charge of complex social problems is cash. This paper discusses the significance of recent progress toward the discovery of the correct cash value of human life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BohmP., 1971, “An approach to the problem of estimating demand for public goods”, in The Economics of Environment, Ed. BohmP.KneeseA. (Macmillan, London).
2.
DawsonR. F. F., 1967, “Costs of road accidents”, Road Research Laboratory Report LR79, 1–64, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berks., England.
3.
FrommG., 1965, “Civil aviation expenditures”, in Measuring Benefits of Government Expenditure, Ed. DorfmanR. (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
4.
KlarmanH., 1965, “Syphilis control programs”, in Measuring Benefits of Government Expenditure, Ed. DorfmanR. (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
5.
MishanE. J., 1971, “Evaluation of life and limb: A theoretical approach”, Journal of Political Economy, 79, 687–705; also reprinted in MishanE. J., Cost Benefit Analysis (Unwin University Books, London), chapters 22 and 23.
6.
RawlsJ., 1972, A Theory of Justice (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
7.
RyleBertrand, Tautologies I Have Known (Reason Press, Oxford).
8.
SwiftJ., 1729, A Modest Proposal, reprinted in Jonathan Swift, 1968 (Random House, New York).
