This paper introduces the theoretical basis for investigating obsolescence that has resulted from the preliminary stage of an ongoing research programme. A specification for model building is included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderC., 1966, “The coordination of the urban rule system”, Working Paper 1, Centre for Planning and Development Research, University of California.
2.
AshbyW. R., 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman and Hall, London).
3.
AylwardG. M., 1966, “Environmental adaptability”, M.A. Thesis, Department of City Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4.
BerryB. J. L., 1963, “Commercial structure and commercial blight”, Research Paper number 85, Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
5.
BlairT. L., 1969, “Twilight-area renewal”, Official Architecture and Planning, 32, 1367.
6.
BourneL. S., 1967, “Private development of the central city”, Research Paper number 112, Department of Geography, University of Chicago.
7.
CapperG. C. F.LewisJ. Parry, 1964, Decay, Development and Land Values (Civic Trust for the North-West, Manchester).
8.
Centre for Urban Studies, 1967, Camden Survey, University College London.
9.
CowanP., 1962, “Studies in the growth, change and ageing of buildings”, Transactions of the Bartlett Society, 1, 53–84.
10.
CowanP., 1965, “Depreciation, obsolescence and ageing”, Architects' Journal, 141, 1395–1401.
11.
CowanP., 1967, “The accommodation of activities”, Arena, Architectural Association Journal, 82, 256–260.
CowanP.FineD.IrelandJ.JordenC.MercerDilysSearsAngela, 1969, The Office: A Facet of Urban Growth (Heinemann, London).
14.
CowanP.SearsAngela, 1966, “Growth, change, adaptability and location”, Joint Unit for Planning Research, London, mimeo.
15.
EnglandR., 1971, “Planning complex building systems”, Nature, 229, 233–236.
16.
HoleW. V.PountneyM. T., 1971, Trends in Population, Housing and Occupancy Rates—1861–1961 (HMSO, London).
17.
Joint Unit for Planning Research, 1967, “A survey of office movers in London”, punched card index; see also Cowan, 1969, chapter 4, loc.cit.
18.
Lichfield, N. and Associates, 1968, Economics of Conservation, York Conservation Study (HMSO, London).
19.
Little, A. D. (Inc.), 1964, “Models for condition ageing of residential structures”, San Francisco Community Renewal Program, Technical Paper number 2, San Francisco.
20.
MedhurstD. F.LewisJ. Parry, 1969, Urban Decay: An Analysis and Policy (Macmillan, London).
21.
MeierR. L., 1962, A Communications Theory of Urban Growth (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
22.
MeyersonM.TerrettB.WheatonW. L. C., 1962, Housing, People and Cities (McGraw-Hill, New York).
NuttB. B.SearsD.RawsonL., 1970, “Obsolescence in the built environment, Report 3: Some empirical studies”, Joint Unit for Planning Research, University College, London.
25.
PahlR. E., 1968, “Spatial structure and social structure”, CES-WP-10 (Centre for Environmental Studies, London).
26.
SchaafA. H., 1969, “Economic feasibility analysis for urban renewal housing rehabilitation”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 399–404.
