This paper examines spatial search behavior related to intra-urban migration. Its approach is to draw upon related studies to derive expectations with regard to search patterns, and to test these through empirical analysis. This involves identifying and measuring distance, directional, and sectoral spatial biases, for which an algorithm is presented that employs a map transformation and standard ellipse analysis.
BachiR., 1962, “Standard distance measures and related methods for spatial analysis”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 10, 83–132.
3.
BatscheletE., 1965, Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Problems in Animal Orientation and Certain Biological Rhythms (American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington).
BrownL. A.HortonF. E.WittickR. I., 1970, “Place utility and the normative allocation of intra-urban migrants”, Demography, 7, 175–183.
6.
BrownL. A.LongbrakeD. B., 1969, “On the implementation of place utility and related concepts: The intra-urban migration case”, in Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium, Eds. CoxK. R.GolledgeR. G., Northwestern University Studies in Geography number 17, Evanston.
7.
BrownL. A.LongbrakeD. B., 1970, “Migration flows in intra-urban space: Place utility considerations”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60, 368–384.
8.
BrownL. A.MooreE. G., 1970, “The intra-urban migration process: A perspective”, Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 52, 1–13; Yearbook of the General Systems Society, 15, 109–122.
9.
BrownL. A.MooreE. G.MoultrieW., 1969, “TRANSMAP: A program for planar transformation of point distributions”, Discussion Paper number 3, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University.
10.
ButlerE. W.ChapinF. S.HemmensG. C.KaiserE. J.StegmanM. A.WeissS. F., 1969, Moving Behaviour and Residential Choice: A National Survey, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report number 81 (Highway Research Board, Washington).
11.
CarrA., 1962, “Orientation problems of the high seas travel and terrestrial movements of marine turtles”, American Scientist, 50, 359–374.
12.
ChapinF. S.HightowerH. C., 1966, Household Activity Systems: A Pilot Investigation (University of North Carolina Institute for Research in Social Science, Chapel Hill).
13.
CoxK. R., 1969, “The genesis of acquaintance field spatial structures: A conceptual model and empirical tests”, in Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium, Eds. CoxK. R.GolledgeR. G., Northwestern University Studies in Geography number 17, Evanston.
14.
DobbieJ. M., 1968, “A survey of search theory”, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 16, 525–537.
15.
EnslowP. H., 1966, “A bibliography of search theory and reconnaissance theory literature”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 13, 177–202.
16.
FoxW. T., 1967, “FORTRAN IV program for vector trend analysis of directional data”, Computer Contribution number 11, State Geological Survey, University of Kansas.
17.
GouldP., 1965, “A bibliography of space searching procedures for geographers”, research note, Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University.
18.
GouldP., 1966, “Space searching procedures in geography and the social sciences”, working paper series 1, University of Hawaii Social Science Research Institute.
19.
Greer-WoottenB.GilmourG., 1970, “Distance and directional bias in migration patterns in depreciating metropolitan areas”, Xerox, Department of Geography, McGill University.
20.
GriffithsJ. C., 1967, Scientific Method in the Analysis of Sediments (McGraw-Hill, New York).
21.
GrigsbyW. G., 1963, Housing Markets and Public Policy (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).
22.
HerbertJ. D.StevensB. W., 1960, “A model of the distribution of residential activity in urban areas”, Journal of Regional Science, 2, 21–36.
23.
HortonF. E.ReynoldsD. R., 1970, “Action space formation: A behavioral approach to predicting urban travel behavior”, Highway Research Record.
24.
HortonF. E.ReynoldsD. R., 1971a, “Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior”, in Perspectives on Urban Spatial Systems, Eds. BrownL. A.MooreE. G. (Economic Geography, Worcester).
25.
HortonF. E.ReynoldsD. R., 1971b, “Intra-urban migration and the perception of residential quality”, in Northern Illinois University Perspectives in Geography, I, Eds. McConnellH.YassenD. (Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb).
26.
KainJ. F., 1962, “Journey to work and residential location”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 9, 137–160.
27.
KaiserE. J., 1968, A Producer Model for Residential Growth (University of North Carolina Institute for Research in Social Science, Chapel Hill).
28.
KaiserE. J., 1968, “Locational decision factors in a producer model of residential development”, Land Economics, 44, 351–362.
LeeD. B., 1966, Analysis and Description of Residential Segregation (Cornell University Center for Housing and Environmental Studies, Ithaca).
31.
MarbleD. F.NystuenJ. D., 1963, “An approach to the direct measurement of community mean information fields”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 11, 99–109.
32.
McNultyM., 1970, “Analysis of the directional components of migration streams”, Discussion Paper number 15, Department of Geography, University of Iowa.
MooreE. G.BrownL. A., 1970, “Urban acquaintance fields: An evaluation of a spatial model”, Environment and Planning, 2, 443–454.
35.
MorrillR. L., 1963, “The distribution of migration distances”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 11, 75–84.
36.
MorrisonP. A., 1968, “Alternative models of population mobility”, Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Human Mobility, Cornell University.
37.
MorrisonP. A., 1969, “Theoretical issues in the design of population mobility models”, RAND Report P-4179, Santa Monica.
38.
NeftD. S., 1966, Statistical Analysis for Areal Distributions, Monograph Series number 2, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia.
39.
OlssonG., 1965, Distance and Human Interaction, Bibliography Series number 2, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia.
40.
PielouE. C., 1969, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology (Wiley, New York).
41.
RossiP. H., 1955, Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility (Free Press, New York).
42.
Schmidt-KoenigK., 1964, “Initial orientation and distance of displacement in pigeon homing”, Nature, 201, 638.
43.
Schmidt-KoenigK., 1965, “Current aspects in bird orientations”, Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1, 217–272.
44.
StephensM. A., 1962, “Exact and approximate tests for directions, I and II”, Biometrika, 49, 463–477, 547–552.
45.
StephensM. A., 1964, “The testing of unit vectors for randomness”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 160–167.
46.
TarverJ. D.GurleyW. R.SkeesP. M., 1967, “Vector representation of migration streams among selected state economic areas during 1955 to 1960”, Demography, 4, 1–18.
47.
WatermanT. H., 1962, “The analysis of spatial orientation”, Ergebnisse Biologie, 26, 98–117.
48.
WeissS. F.SmithJ. E.KaiserE. J.KennyK. B., 1966, Residential Developer Decisions (University of North Carolina Institute for Research in Social Science, Chapel Hill).
49.
WolpertJ., 1965, “Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate”, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169.
50.
WolpertJ., 1966, “Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress”, Journal of Social Issues, 22, 92–102.
51.
WolpertJ., 1967, “Distance and directional bias in inter-urban migratory streams”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57, 605–616.
