The article notes that P.P.B.S. is attracting much attention as a means of making planning more effective. Some examples of the limitations of current planning are given, and the need for a more comprehensive approach is suggested. P.P.B.S. is defined and the current role of physical planners is examined in relation to it. A wider view of planning and different types of plans are stated, and the probable impact of P.P.B.S. on future planning through objectives, analysis, programming and information systems is discussed. Increasing emphasis is likely to be placed on full interdisciplinary collaboration if the potential of P.P.B.S. is to be realised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MaudJohnSir (Chairman), 1967, Report of the Committee on the Management of Local Government (HMSO, London).
2.
NovickD., 1961, New Tools for Planners and Programmers (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, U.S.A.).
3.
StewartJ.D., 1969, “New approaches to management in Local Government”, The Local Government Chronicle, 4 January.
4.
StewartJ.D., 1970, “Local authority policy planning”, The Local Government Chronicle, 3 January.
