The purpose of this paper is to show that the failure to perceive the full burden of commuting costs can bias the residential location decision in favor of distant locations. Initially, the argument is developed. Then, Federal Housing Administration data on the site expenditures of families purchasing single-family dwellings in the United States are used as a basis for an empirical investigation, the results of which are shown to be consistent with the argument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlonsoW., 1964, Location and Land Use (Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts)
2.
Federal Housing Administration, 1962–1964, Data for States and Selected Areas, Washington, D.C.
3.
HooverE., 1968, “The evolving form and organization of the metropolis”, in Issues in Urban Economics, Eds. PerloffH. S. and WingoL. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), pp. 237–284.
4.
LansingJ.MuellerE., and BarthN., 1964, Residential Location and Urban Mobility (Survey Research Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
5.
MuthR., “Urban residential land and housing markets”, in Issues in Urban Economics, Eds. PerloffH. S. and WingoL. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), pp. 285–334.
