This essay proposes that subcultural practices such as gossip and fan writing are feminist epistemologies that can form radical archive inquiry and knowledge production, and creative outputs. Drawing on feminist new materialism and archive theory, I develop a set of principles for practice-based research methodologies that incorporate a researcher's intersubjective relationship with archive matter (e.g. records, documents, classification systems, social-material contexts) and consider the production of knowledge from such research as forms of tabulation. Fabulation here is seen as part of a critically transgressive epistemological stance that expands feminist critiques of universalising master narratives and archive orthodoxies. My proposition, formed in part through a residency in the Woman's Art Library in London, is to name such research gestures ‘archive fanfiction’, where experimental and practice-oriented method moves with feminist politics and activism.
BoyceS., 2013—ongoing. The Devotional Collection. CDs, cassettes, vinyl records and other ephemera relating to black British women in the music industry.
9.
ButtG., 2005. Between You and Me: Queer Disclosures in the New York Art World, 1948–1963.Durham: Duke University Press.
10.
CarsonA., 2001. Men in the Off Hours.New York: Vintage.
11.
CixousH., 2007. Manhattan: Letters from Prehistory.New York: Fordham University Press.
12.
ChanderA., and SunderM., 2007. Everyone's a superhero: a cultural theory of Mary Sue fan fiction as fair use. California Law Review, 95(2), pp. 597–626.
13.
CvetkovichA., 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures.Durham: Duke University Press.
14.
DerridaJ., 1998. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
EichhornK., 2013. The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
FinemanJ., 2005. The history of the anecdote: fiction and fiction. In FinemanJ., ed. The Subjectivity Effect in Western Literary Tradition: Essays Toward the Release of Shakespeare's Will.Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 59–87.
17.
FoucaultM., 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In BouchardD.F., ed. Language, Counter Memory, Practice.Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 139–164.
18.
FoucaultM., 1980. Two lectures. In GordonC., ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977.New York: Vintage, pp. 78–108.
19.
GallopJ., 2002. Anecdotal Theory.Durham: Duke University Press.
20.
GopinathG., 2010. Archive, affect and the everyday: queer diasporic re-visions. In StaigerJ., CvetkovichA., and ReynoldsA., eds. Political Emotions.London: Routledge, pp. 165–192.
21.
GordonJ.B., 2015. Gossip and Subversion in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction.New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
22.
GrantC., 2011. Fans of feminism: re-writing histories of second-wave feminism in contemporary art. Oxford Art Journal, 34(2), pp. 265–286.
23.
GreenanA., 2007. How images are the making of the Women's Art Library/Make. Art Libraries Journal, 32(1), pp. 4–9.
24.
Guerrilla Girls, 1988. The Advantages of Being a Woman Artist.Poster. Held at London: Tate Modern.
25.
HarawayD., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575–599.
26.
HardingS., 1986. The Science Question in Feminism.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27.
HardingS., ed., 1987. Feminism and Methodology.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28.
HardingS., 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives.Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
29.
IngletonH., 2015. Sounding out archival interventions. Presentation made at Gender and the Archive: Conversation Across Disciplines and Practices, 30 January. University of Roehampton, London. Available at: https://soundcloud.com/dept-humanities-uniroeham/panel-2-stories-voices [last accessed 15 May 2015].
JenkinsH., 2013. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture.London: Routledge.
32.
LovelessN.S., 2011. Reading with knots: on Jane Gallop's anecdotal theory. S: Journal of the Jan van Eyck Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique, 4, pp. 24–36.
33.
LykkeN., 2010. Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing.New York: Routledge.
34.
Motamedi FraserM., 2012. Once upon a problem. The Sociological Review, 60(S1), pp. 84–107.
35.
PesterH., 2015. Go to Reception and Ask for Sara in Red Felt Tip.London: Book Works.
Ridykeulous, 2006. The Advantages of Being a Lesbian Woman Artist. LTTR, 5, p. 53.
38.
RogoffI., 1995. Gossip as testimony: a postmodern signature. MAKE Magazine, 67, pp. 6–9.
39.
RogoffI., 2002. Gossip as testimony: a postmodern signature. In JonesA., ed. The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader.London and New York: Routledge, pp. 58–65.
40.
ScholesR., 1976. The roots of science fiction. In RoseM., ed. Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, pp. 46–56.
41.
SmithL.T., 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.London and New York: Zed Books.
The Otolith Group, cur., 2007. The Ghost of Songs: The Film Art of the Black Audio Film Collective, 1982–1998.Exhibition held at Liverpool: FACT, 2 February—1 April.
47.
ThropM., and WalshM., 2015. Twenty Years of MAKE Magazine: Back to the Future of Women's ArtLondon: I.B. Tauris, Limited.
48.
WakefordN., 2014. 484 14th Street. Video installation. Exhibited at London: Legion TV, 10 July—9 August.
