Given the growing popularity of online methods for researchers and the increasing awareness of the levels of harassment and abuse directed at women online—especially women expressing feminist views—it is critical that we address the implications of online abuse for feminist researchers. Focussing on an often hidden yet significant part of our methodological decisions and recruitment, this paper details the online abuse levelled by men's rights activists against a research project on women's experiences of men's stranger intrusions in public space. It argues for the need to locate such experiences within a violence-against-women frame, extending the concept of a continuum of sexual violence. Such an extension renders visible the added labour of ‘safety work’, which forms an invisible backdrop to the methodological decisions of many feminist researchers.
AndersonK., and JackD.C., 1991. Learning to listen: interview techniques and analysis. In GluckS.B., and PataiD., eds. Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History.New York: Routledge, pp. 11–26.
3.
BatesL., 2014. Everyday Sexism.London: Simon and Schuster.
4.
BinnsA., 2012. DON'T FEED THE TROLLS! Managing troublemakers in magazines’ online communities. Journalism Practice, 6(4), pp. 547–562.
5.
BrowneK., 2005. Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), pp. 47–60.
6.
BuZ., XiaZ., and WangJ., 2013. A sock puppet detection algorithm on virtual spaces. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, pp. 366–377.
7.
CampbellR., 2002. Emotionally Involved: The Impact of Researching Rape.New York: Routledge.
8.
CookJ.A., and FanowM.M., 1990. Knowledge and women's interests: issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In NiebanJ.M., ed. Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences.Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 69–93.
9.
CoyM., 2006. This morning I'm a researcher, this afternoon I'm an outreach worker: ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), pp. 419–431.
10.
DavisD.E., 1993. The harm that has no name: street harassment, embodiment, and African American women. UCLA Women's Law Journal, 4(2), pp. 133–178.
11.
DeVaultM.L., 1990. Talking and listening from women's standpoint: feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37(1), pp. 96–116.
12.
DonathJ., 1998. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In SmithM., and KollockP., eds. Communities in Cyberspace.New York: Routledge, pp. 29–59.
13.
End Violence Against Women, 2013. New Technology: Same Old Problems, Report of a Roundtable on Social Media and Violence Against Women and Girls.London: End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW).
14.
EnglandK.V.L., 1994. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), pp. 80–89.
15.
Fogg-DavisH.G., 2006. Theorizing black lesbians within black feminism: a critique of same-race street harassment. Politics and Gender, 2(1), pp. 57–76.
16.
GardnerC.B., 1995. Passing By: Gender and Public Harassment.Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
GarnerM., 2016. Conflicts, Contradictions and Commitments: Men Speak About the Sexualisation of Culture.PhD. London: School of Social Sciences, London Metropolitan University.
18.
GreerG., 1971. The Female Eunuch.London: Grand Publishing.
19.
HardakerC., 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: from user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), pp. 215–242.
20.
HenryN., and PowellA., 2015. Embodied harms: gender, shame and technology-facilitated sexual violence in cyberspace. Violence Against Women, 21(6), pp. 758–779.
21.
HerringS., Job-SluderK., SchecklerR., and BarabS., 2002. Searching for safety online: managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18(5), pp. 371–384.
22.
HerringS.C., 1996. Posting in a different voice: gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In EssC., ed. Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication.Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 115–145.
23.
HerringS.C., 1999. The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society, 15, pp. 151–167.
24.
HerringS.C., 2000. Gender differences in CMC: findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Newsletter, 18(1). Available at: http://cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring [last accessed 9 May 2011].
25.
HerringS.C., 2002. Cyber violence: recognizing and resisting abuse in online environments. Asian Women, 14(Summer), pp. 187–212. Available at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/∼herring/violence.html [last accessed 6 April 2016].
26.
HerringS.C., 2003. Gender and power in online communication. In HolmesJ., and MeyerhoffM., eds. The Handbook of Language and Gender.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 202–228.
27.
HerringS.C., JohnsonD.A., and DiBenedettoT., 1995. ‘This discussion is going too far!’: male resistance to female participation on the internet. In HallK., and BucholtzM., eds. Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self.New York: Routledge, pp. 67–96.
28.
HochschildA.R., 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling.Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
JaneE.A., 2012. ‘Your a ugly, whorish, slut’: understanding e-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), pp. 1–16.
30.
JaneE.A., 2015. Flaming? What flaming? The pitfalls and potentials of researching online hostility. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(1), pp. 65–87.
31.
JeffnerS., 2000. Different space for action: the everyday meaning of young people's perception of rape. Paper presented at ESS Faculty Seminar, May. University of North London, London.
32.
KanyeredziA., 2013. Finding a voice: African and Caribbean heritage women help seeking. In RehmanY., KellyL., and SiddiquiH., eds. Moving in the Shadows: Violence in the Lives of Minority Women and Children.London: Ashgate, pp. 205–224.
33.
KayanyJ.M., 1998. Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), pp. 1135–1141.
34.
KearlH., 2010. Stop Street Harassment: Making Public Places Safe and Welcoming for Women.Santa Barbara: Praeger.
KellyL., 1988. Surviving Sexual Violence.Oxford: Polity Press.
37.
KellyL., 2007. A conducive context: trafficking of persons in Central Asia. In LeeM., ed. Human Trafficking.Portland: Willan Publishing.
38.
KellyL., and RadfordJ., 1990. ‘Nothing really happened’: the invalidation of women's experiences of sexual violence. Critical Social Policy, 10(30), pp. 39–53.
39.
KellyL., and WestmorlandN., 2015. Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: Steps Towards Change, Project Mirabal Final Report.London and Durham: London Metropolitan University and Durham University.
40.
KowalskiR.M., LimberS.P., and AgatstonP.W., 2012. Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age.Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
41.
LaniyaO.O., 2005. Street smut: gender, media, and the legal power dynamics of street harassment, or hey sexy and other verbal ejaculations. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 14(1), pp. 91–142.
42.
LeaM., O'SheaT., FungP., and SpearsR., 1992. ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication: observations, explanations, implications. In LeaM., ed. Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication.London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 89–112.
43.
MadrizE., 2003. Focus groups in feminist research. In DesnzinN.K., and LincolnY.S., eds. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 363–388.
McKenzie-MohrS., and LafranceM.N., 2011. Telling stories without the words: ‘tightrope talk’ in women's accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), pp. 49–73.
46.
Morahan-MartinJ., 2000. Women and the internet: promise and perils. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5), pp. 683–691.
47.
OakleyA., ed., 2005. The Ann Oakley Reader: Gender, Women and Social Science.Bristol: The Policy Press.
48.
O'SullivanP.B., and FlanaginA.J., 2003. Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5(1), pp. 69–94.
49.
ReidE., 1999. Hierarchy and power: social control in cyberspace. In SmithM.A., and KollockP., eds. Communities in Cyberspace.London: Routledge, pp. 107–133.
50.
StanleyL., and WiseS., 1979. Feminist research, feminist consciousness and experiences of sexism. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 2(3), pp. 259–74.
51.
SulerJ., 2004. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), pp. 321–326.
