Over the past two decades, openness (e.g. ‘open’ innovation, ‘open’ education and ‘open’ strategy) has been of increasing interest for researchers and of increasing relevance to practitioners. Openness is often deeply embedded in information technology (IT) and can be both a driver for and a result of innovative IT. To clarify the concept of “openness”, we provide an overview of the scope of cross-disciplinary research on openness. Based on this overview, we develop a framework of openness, which proposes a higher-order concept of “openness” characterised by transparency, access, participation and democracy. The framework further distinguishes open resources, open processes and the effects of opening on particular domains. To provide the historical context and to appreciate the role of IT in openness, we discuss two historical examples of openness: the introduction of an open science model in academia (openness without IT) and the emergence of open source software development (openness with IT). We conclude by highlighting some concerns with and limitations of “openness”.
AfuahA., and TucciC.L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review, 37 (3), 355–375.
2.
AgerfalkP.J., and FitzgeraldB. (2008). Outsourcing to an Unknown Workforce: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy. MIS Quarterly, 32 (2), 385–410.
3.
BaldwinC.Y., and ClarkK.B. (2006). The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model?Management Science, 52 (7), 1116–1127.
4.
BenklerY. (2002). Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal, 112 (3), 369–446.
5.
BenklerY. (2006). The Wealth of Networks.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
BenlianA., HilkertD., and HessT. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30 (3), 209–228.
7.
BergerP.L., and LuckmannT.1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin, UK.
8.
BernsteinE.S. (2012). The Transparency Paradox a Role for Privacy in Organizational Learning and Operational Control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57 (2), 181–216.
9.
BirkinshawJ., and CableD.2017. The Dark Side of Transparency, McKinsey Quarterly.
10.
BoudreauK.J. (2012). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation. Organization Science, 23 (5), 1409–1427.
11.
CapraE., FrancalanciC., MerloF., and LamastraC.R. (2009). A survey on firms’ participation in open source community projects, in IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems.Springer, pp. 225–236.
12.
CeruzziP.E. (2003). A history of modern computing.MIT press.
13.
ChesbroughH.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
ChesbroughH.W. (2007). Open Business Models: How to Thrive In the New Innovation Landscape.Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
15.
ConboyK., and MorganL. (2011). Beyond the customer: Opening the agile systems development process. Information and Software Technology, 53 (5), 535–542.
16.
CraneD. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (1st ed.). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
17.
CrowstonK., and WadeM.R. (2010). Empirical Research on Free/Libre Open Source Software. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11 (11), I–V.
18.
DahlanderL., and GannD.M. (2010). How Open Is Innovation?Research Policy, 39 (6), 699–709.
19.
DavidP.A. (2004). Understanding the emergence of ‘open science'institutions: functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (4), 571–589.
20.
DavidP. (2005). From Keeping ‘Nature's Secrets’ to the Institutionalization of ‘Open Science’. In GoshR. A. (ed.), CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy (pp. 85–108). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
21.
DavidP.A. (2008). The Historical Origins of ‘Open Science’: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3 (2), 1–116.
22.
de Solla PriceD.J., and BeaverD. (1966). Collaboration in an Invisible College. American Psychologist, 21 (11), 1011–1018.
23.
Di GangiP.M., WaskoM.M., and HookerR.E. (2010). Getting Customers’ Ideas to Work for You: Learning From Dell how to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9 (4), 213–228.
24.
EisenmannT., ParkerG., and van AlstyneM.W. (2009). Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?, in GamerA. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 131–162.
25.
FellerJ., FinneganP., and NilssonO. (2011). Open Innovation and Public Administration: Transformational Typologies and Business Model Impacts. European Journal of Information Systems, 20 (3), 358–374.
26.
FellerJ., and FitzgeraldB. (2000). A Framework Analysis of the Open Source Software Development Paradigm, in International Conference on Information Systems.
27.
FellerJ., and FitzgeraldB. (2002). Understanding Open Source Software Development.London, UK: Addison-Wesley.
28.
GacekC., and AriefB. (2004). The Many Meanings of Open Source. IEEE Software, 21 (1), 34–40.
29.
GallaugherJ., and RansbothamS. (2010). Social Media and Customer Dialog Management at Starbucks. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9 (4), 197–212.
30.
GermonprezM., HovorkaD., and GalU. (2011). Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12 (10), 662–683.
31.
GibbsJ.L., RozaidiN.A., and EisenbergJ. (2013). Overcoming the “Ideology of Openness”: Probing the Affordances of Social Media for Organizational Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 (1), 102–120.
32.
GoldmanR., and GabrielR.P. (2005). Innovation Happens Elsewhere.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann.
33.
HardawayD.E., and ScamellR.W. (2012). Open Knowledge Creation: Bringing Transparency and Inclusiveness to the Peer Review Process. MIS Quarterly, 36 (2), 339–346.
34.
HautzJ., SeidlD., and WhittingtonR. (in press). Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics, Long Range Planning.
35.
HoweJ. (2008). Crowdsourcing.New York, NY, USA: Crown.
36.
HowisonJ., and CrowstonK. (2014). Collaboration Through Open Superposition: A Theory of the Open Source Way. MIS Quarterly, 38 (1), 29–50.
37.
JanssenM., CharalabidisY., and ZuiderwijkA. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29 (4), 258–268.
38.
JeppesenL.B., and LakhaniK.R. (2010). Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search. Organization Science, 21 (5), 1016–1033.
39.
KuhnT.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
40.
KuppuswamyV., and BayusB.L. (2013). Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Projects Backers in Kickstarter, DRUID Conference.
41.
LakhaniK.R., and von HippelE. (2003). How Open Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to-User Assistance. Research Policy, 32 (6), 923–943.
42.
LeeG.K., and ColeR.E. (2003). From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development,”Organization Science (14:6), pp. 633–649 + 754–755.
43.
LeimeisterJ.M., HuberM., BretschneiderU., and KrcmarH. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (1), 197–224.
44.
LeonardiP.M., HuysmanM., and SteinfieldC. (2013). Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 (1), 1–19.
45.
LevyM., and GermonprezM. (2017). The Potential for Citizen Science in Information Systems Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 40 (1), 2.
46.
MajchrzakA., and MalhotraA. (2013). Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22 (3), 257–268.
MorganL., FellerJ., and FinneganP. (2013). Exploring Value Networks: Theorising the Creation and Capture of Value with Open Source Software. European Journal of Information Systems, 22 (5), 569–588.
49.
NickersonJ.V., SundararajanA., and TeiglandR. (2016). Call for Papers, Track on ‘Crowdsourcing, Crowdfunding, Blockchain and the Sharing Economy, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).
50.
NielsenM. (2011). Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science.Princeton University Press.
51.
ObamaB. (2009). Transparency and Open Government, in Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies.
OrlikowskiW.J., and ScottS.V. (2015). The Algorithm and the Crowd: Considering the Materiality of Service Innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39 (1), 201–216.
54.
PetersM.A., and BritezR.G. (2008). Open education and education for openness.Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
55.
PopperK.R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies (Vol. 1 and 2).London: Routledge.
56.
PuranamP., AlexyO., and ReitzigM. (2014). What's ‘New’ About New Forms of Organizing?Academy of Management Review, 39 (2), 162–180.
57.
RaymondE. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 12 (3), 23–49.
58.
SamuelsonP. (2006). IBM's Pragmatic Embrace of Open Source. Communications of the ACM, 49 (10), 21–25.
59.
SchlagweinD., and Bjørn-AndersenN. (2014). Organizational Learning with Crowdsourcing: The Revelatory Case of LEGO. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15 (11), 754–778.
60.
SchlagweinD., and HuM. (2017). How and Why Organizations Use Social Media: Five Use Types and Their Relation to Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Information Technology, 32 (22), 194–209.
61.
StallmanR. (1985). The GNU Manifesto.
62.
StolK.-J., and FitzgeraldB. (2015). Inner Source – Adopting Open Source Development Practices in Organizations: A Tutorial. IEEE Software, 32 (4), 60–67.
63.
SuberP. (2013). Open Access (Vol. 1).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
64.
SundararajanA. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism.Boston, MA, USA: MIT Press.
65.
TavakoliA., SchlagweinD., and SchoderD. (in press). Open Strategy: Literature Review, Re-Analysis of Cases and Conceptualisation as a Practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems.
66.
TiwanaA. (2014). Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance and Strategy.Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
67.
TsoukasH. (1997). The Tyranny of Light: The Temptations and the Paradoxes of the Information Society. Futures, 29 (9), 827–843.
68.
van der AalstW., BichlerM., and HeinzlA. (2016). Open Research in Business and Information Systems Engineering. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 58 (6), 375–379.
69.
WeberM. (1904). Die ‘Objektivität’ Sozialwissenschaftlicher und Sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis ['Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy]. Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19 (1), 22–87.
70.
WestJ., SalterA., VanhaverbekeW., and ChesbroughH. (2014). Open Innovation: The Next Decade. Research Policy, 43 (5), 805–811.
71.
WhelanE., ConboyK., CrowstonK., MorganL., and RossiM. (2014). “The Role of Information Systems in Enabling Open Innovation, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15 (11), xx–xxx.
72.
WigginsA., and CrowstonK. (2011). From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
73.
ZuboffS. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30 (1), 75–89.
74.
ZuchowskiO., PoseggaO., SchlagweinD., and FischbachK. (2016). Internal Crowdsourcing: Conceptual Framework, Structured Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 31 (2), 166–184.
