The reuse of existing knowledge is an indispensable part of the creation of novel ideas. In the creative domain knowledge reuse is a common practice known as “remixing”. With the emergence of open internet-based platforms in recent years, remixing has found its way from the world of music and art to the design of arbitrary physical goods. However, despite its obvious relevance for the number and quality of innovations on such platforms, little is known about the process of remixing and its contextual factors. This paper considers the example of Thingiverse, a platform for the 3D printing community that allows its users to create, share, and access a broad range of printable digital models. We present an explorative study of remixing activities that took place on the platform over the course of six years by using an extensive set of data on models and users. On the foundation of these empirically observed phenomena, we formulate a set of theoretical propositions and managerial implications regarding (1) the role of remixes in design communities, (2) the different patterns of remixing processes, (3) the platform features that facilitate remixes, and (4) the profile of the remixing platform's users.
AlbertM.B., AveryD., NarinF., and McAllisterP. (1991). Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents, Research Policy20 (3): 251–259.
2.
AllenT., and HennG. (2007), The Organization and Architecture of Innovation.London: Routledge.
3.
AlmeidaP. (1996). Knowledge Sourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis in the US Semiconductor Industry, Strategic Management Journal17 (S2): 155–165.
4.
AndersonC. (2013), Makers: The New Industrial Revolution.London: Random House Business.
5.
AragonC.R., PoonS.S., Monroy-HernandezA., and AragonD. (2009). A Tale of two Online Communities: Fostering Collaboration and Creativity in Scientists and Children, in Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Berkeley, USA, 2009); New York: ACM, pp. 9–18.
6.
ArthurW.B. (2009). The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, New York: Simon and Schuster.
7.
ArtsS., and VeugelersR. (2015). Technology Familiarity, Recombinant Novelty, and Breakthrough Invention, Industrial and Corporate Change24 (6): 1215–1246.
8.
BakerT., and NelsonR.E. (2005). Creating Something From Nothing: Resource Construction Through Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly50 (3): 329–366.
9.
BastianM., HeymannS., and JacomyM. (2009). Gephi. An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks, in Proceedings of the 3rd AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (San Jose, USA, 2009). California: AAAI.
10.
BayusB.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Over Time: An Analysis of the Dell Ideastorm Community, Management Science59 (1): 226–244.
11.
BenklerY. (2009). Internet and Society: Sharing, Trading, Creating Culture, Science324 (5925): 337–338.
12.
BenlianA., HilkertD., and HessT. (2015). How Open is this Platform? The Meaning and Measurement of Platform Openness from the Complementers’ Perspective, Journal of Information Technology30 (3): 209–228.
13.
BerkunS. (2010). The Myths of Innovation, Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media.
14.
BermanB. (2012). 3-D Printing. The New Industrial Revolution, Business Horizons55 (2): 155–162.
15.
BirkinshawJ., BouquetC., and BarsouxJ.-L. (2012). The 5 Myths of Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review52 (2): 43–50.
16.
BlohmI., LeimeisterJ.M., and KrcmarH. (2013). Crowdsourcing: How to Benefit from (Too) Many Great Ideas, MIS Quarterly Executive12 (4): 199–211.
17.
BockG.W., KankanhalliA., and SharmaS. (2006). Are Norms Enough? The Role of Collaborative Norms in Promoting Organizational Knowledge Seeking, European Journal of Information Systems15 (4): 357–367.
18.
BrynjolfssonE., and McAfeeA. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
19.
CarnabuciG., and OpertiE. (2013). Where do Firms’ Recombinant Capabilities Come From? Intraorganizational Networks, Knowledge, and Firms’ Ability to in Novate Through Technological Recombination, Strategic Management Journal34 (13): 1591–1613.
20.
CheliotisG., ChikW., GuglaniA., and TayiG.K. (2007) Taking Stock of the Creative Commons Experiment: Monitoring the Use of Creative Commons Licenses and Evaluating its Implications for the Future of Creative Commons and for Copyright Law, 35th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (Fairfax, USA, 2007).
21.
CheliotisG., HuN., YewJ., and HuangJ. (2014) The Antecedents of Remix, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Baltimore, USA 2014); New York: ACM, pp. 1011–1022.
22.
CheliotisG., and YewJ. (2009) An Analysis of the Social Structure of Remix Culture, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (University Park, USA, 2009); New York: ACM, pp. 165–174.
23.
CiborraC.U. (1996). The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises, Organization Science7 (2): 103–118.
24.
CiborraC.U. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
CorradiniC., BattistiG., and DemirelP. (2016). Serial Innovators in the UK: Does Size Matter?Industrial and Corporate Change25 (1): 23–47.
26.
CougerJ.D., HigginsL.F., and McIntyreS.C. (1993). (Un)structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations, Management Information Systems Quarterly17 (4): 375–397.
27.
CsardiG., and NepuszT. (2006). The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research, International Journal of Complex Systems in Science1695 (5): 1–9.
28.
CunninghamS.W. (2009). Analysis for Radical Design, Technological Forecasting and Social Change76 (9): 1138–1149.
29.
DabbishL., StuartC., TsayJ., and HerbslebJ. (2012). Social Coding in GitHub: Transparency and Collaboration in an Open Software Repository, in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, USA, 2012); New York: ACM, pp. 1277–1286.
30.
DasguptaS., HaleW., Monroy-HernándezA., and HillB.M. (2016) Remixing as a Pathway to Computational Thinking, in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (San Francisco, USA, 2016); New York: ACM.
31.
De WaalG.A., and KnottP. (2013). Innovation Tool Adoption and Adaptation in Small Technology-Based Firms, International Journal of Innovation Management17 (3): 1340012.
32.
Di BattistaG., EadesP., TamassiaR., and TollisI.G. (1999). Graph Drawing. Algorithms for the Visualization of Graphs, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
33.
Di GangiP.M., and WaskoM. (2009). Steal my Idea! Organizational Adoption of User Innovations from a User Innovation Community: A Case Study of Dell IdeaStorm, Decision Support Systems48 (1): 303–312.
34.
DodgsonM., GannD.M., and PhillipsN. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FordyceR., HeemsbergenL., ApperleyT., ArnoldM., BirtchnellT., LuoM. (2016). Things, Tags, Topics: Thingiverse's Object-Centred Network, Communication Research and Practice2 (1): 63–78.
41.
GalunicD.C., and RodanS. (1998). Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation, Strategic Management Journal19 (12): 1193–1201.
42.
GansterD.C., HennesseyH.W., and LuthansF. (1983). Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models, Academy of Management Journal26 (2): 321–331.
43.
GarudR., TuertscherP., and Van de VenA.H. (2013). Perspectives on Innovation Processes, The Academy of Management Annals7 (1): 775–819.
44.
GregorS. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly30 (2): 611–642.
45.
GruberM., HarhoffD., and HoislK. (2013). Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers, Management Science59 (4): 837–851.
46.
GuZ., GuL., EilsR., SchlesnerM., and BrorsB. (2014). Circlize Implements and Enhances Circular Visualization in R, Bioinformatics30 (19): 2811–2812.
47.
GuanJ., and LiuN. (2015). Invention Profiles and Uneven Growth in the Field of Emerging Nano-Energy, Energy Policy76, 146–157.
48.
HaefligerS., von KroghG., and SpaethS. (2008). Code Reuse in Open Source Software, Management Science54 (1): 180–193.
49.
HargadonA. (2003). How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
50.
HertelG., NiednerS., and HerrmannS. (2003). Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: an Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel, Research Policy32 (7): 1159–1177.
51.
HewettT.T. (2005). Informing the Design of Computer-Based Environments to Support Creativity, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies63 (4): 383–409.
52.
HeyT., TansleyS., and TolleK. (Eds.). (2009). The Fourth Paradigm. Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, Redmond: Microsoft Research.
53.
HuysmanM., and WulfV. (2006). IT to Support Knowledge Sharing in Communities, Towards a Social Capital Analysis, Journal of Information Technology21 (1): 40–51.
54.
HwangE., SinghP., and ArgoteL. (2014) Jack of All, Master of Some: The Contingent Effect of Knowledge Breadth on Innovation, in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (Auckland, New Zealand, 2014); Atlanta: AIS.
55.
IhakaR., and GentlemanR. (1996). R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics5 (3): 299–314.
56.
JacomyM., VenturiniT., HeymannS., and BastianM. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software, PLoS ONE9 (6): e98679.
57.
JohnsonN.F. (2009). Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory, New York: Oneworld Publications.
58.
KaneG., and RansbothamS. (2012) Codification and Collaboration: Information Quality in Social Media, in Proceedings of the 33th International Conference on Information Systems (Orlando, USA, 2012); Atlanta: AIS.
59.
KaplanS., and VakiliK. (2015). The Double-Edged Sword of Recombination in Breakthrough Innovation, Strategic Management Journal36 (10): 1435–1457.
60.
KarkiM.M.S. (1997). Patent Citation Analysis: A Policy Analysis Tool, World Patent Information19 (4): 269–272.
61.
KatilaR., and AhujaG. (2002). Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction, Academy of Management Journal45 (6): 1183–1194.
62.
KhatibF., CooperS., TykaM.D., XuK., MakedonI., PopovićZ. (2011). Algorithm Discovery by Protein Folding Game Players, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108 (47): 18949–18953.
63.
KyriakouH., EnglehardtS., and NickersonJ.V. (2012). Networks of Innovation in 3D Printing, in 4th Workshop on Information on Networks (New York, USA, 2012).
64.
KyriakouH., and NickersonJ.V. (2013). Idea inheritance, originality, and collective innovation, in 5th Workshop on Information on Networks (New York, USA, 2013).
65.
LakhaniK.R., and von HippelE. (2003). How Open Source Software Works: “free” User-to-User Assistance, Research Policy32 (6): 923–943.
66.
LeeK.Y., LeeM., BassellierG., and FarajS. (2010) The Impact of Emotional Expressions on Knowledge Creation in Online Communities, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Systems (St. Louis, USA, 2010); Atlanta: AIS.
67.
LeendersR.T., and DolfsmaW.A. (2016). Social Networks for Innovation and New Product Development, Journal of Product Innovation Management33 (2): 123–131.
68.
LeimeisterJ.M., HuberM., BretschneiderU., and KrcmarH. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition, Journal of Management Information Systems26 (1): 197–224.
69.
LenhartA., and MaddenM. (2005). Teen Content Creators and Consumers, Pew Internet & American Life Project.
70.
LeonardiP.M. (2014). Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility, Information Systems Research25 (4): 796–816.
71.
LessigL. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, New York: Penguin Press.
72.
LipsonH., and KurmanM. (2013). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing, Indianapolis: Wiley.
73.
MajchrzakA., CooperL.P., and NeeceO.E. (2004). Knowledge Reuse for Innovation, Management Science50 (2): 174–188.
74.
MarkusL.M. (2001). Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success, Journal of Management Information Systems18 (1): 57–93.
75.
MitchellB.T., and SubramaniM.R. (2010) Knowledge Repositories and Knowledgeable Action, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Systems (St. Louis, USA, 2010); Atlanta: AIS.
76.
MukherjeeS., UzziB., JonesB., and StringerM. (2016). A New Method for Identifying Recombinations of Existing Knowledge Associated with High-Impact Innovation, Journal of Product Innovation Management33 (2): 224–236.
77.
MüllerO., JunglasI., Vom BrockeJ., and DebortoliS. (2016). Utilizing Big Data Analytics for Information Systems Research. Challenges, Promises and Guidelines, European Journal of Information Systems25 (4): 289–302.
78.
Müller-WienbergenF., MüllerO., SeidelS., and BeckerJ. (2011). Leaving the Beaten Tracks in Creative Work—A Design Theory for Systems that Support Convergent and Divergent Thinking, Journal of the Association for Information Systems12 (11): 714–740.
79.
NakamuraH., SuzukiS., SakataI., and KajikawaY. (2015). Knowledge Combination Modeling: The Measurement of Knowledge Similarity Between Different Technological Domains, Technological Forecasting and Social Change94, 187–201.
80.
NavarraD.D. (2005). Governance, Architecture and Action: Claudio's Shih, European Journal of Information Systems14 (5): 492–494.
81.
NelsonA.J. (2009). Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion, Research Policy38 (6): 994–1005.
82.
NelsonR.R., and WinterS.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
83.
NerkarA. (2003). Old is gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge, Management Science49 (2): 211–229.
84.
OehlbergL., WillettW., and MackayW.E. (2015) Patterns of Physical Design Remixing in Online Maker Communities, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015); New York: ACM, pp. 639–648.
85.
OlssonO., and FreyB.S. (2002). Entrepreneurship as Recombinant Growth, Small Business Economics19 (2): 69–80.
86.
PapadimitriouS., PapalexakisE., LiuB., and XiongH. (2015). Remix in 3D printing: What your sources say about you, in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence, Italy); New York: ACM, pp. 367–368.
87.
PaytonF.C. (2016). Cultures of Participation—For Students, by Students, Information Systems Journal26 (4): 319–338.
88.
PerrettiF., and NegroG. (2007). Mixing Genres and Matching People: A Study in Innovation and Team Composition in Hollywood, Journal of Organizational Behavior28 (5): 563–586.
89.
RansbothamS., and KaneG.C. (2011). Membership Turnover and Collaboration Success in Online Communities: Explaining Rises and Falls from Grace in Wikipedia, Management Information Systems Quarterly35 (3): 613–627.
90.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria [www document] https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 13th July 2016).
RosenbergN. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
RothenbergerM.A., KulkarniU.R., and DooleyK. (1998). Critical success factors for software projects in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Systems (Helsinki, Finland, 1998); Atalanta: AIS.
94.
SalterA., and AlexyO. (2014). The Nature of Innovation. In DodgsonM., GannD.M., and PhillipsN. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (pp. 26–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
SambamurthyV., and SubramaniM. (2005). Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, Management Information Systems Quarterly29 (2): 1–7.
96.
SapsedJ., and TschangF.T. (2014). Art is Long, Innovation is Short: Lessons from the Renaissance and the Digital Age, Technological Forecasting and Social Change83, 127–141.
97.
SchoenmakersW., and DuystersG. (2010). The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions, Research Policy39 (8): 1051–1059.
98.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper and Brothers.
99.
SeidelS., Müller-WienbergenF., and BeckerJ. (2010). The Concept of Creativity in the Information Systems Discipline: Past, Present, and Prospects, Communications of the Association for Information Systems27 (1): 217–242.
100.
SenyardJ., BakerT., SteffensP., and DavidssonP. (2014). Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource-Constrained New Firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management31 (2): 211–230.
101.
SeshadriS., and ShapiraZ. (2003). The flow of Ideas and Timing of Evaluation as Determinants of Knowledge Creation, Industrial and Corporate Change12 (5): 1099–1124.
102.
ShneidermanB. (2007). Creativity Support Tools: Accelerating Discovery and Innovation, Communications of the ACM50 (12): 20–32.
103.
SimontonD.K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
104.
SojerM., AlexyO., KleinknechtS., and HenkelJ. (2014). Understanding the Drivers of Unethical Programming Behavior: The Inappropriate Reuse of Internet-Accessible Code, Journal of Management Information Systems31 (3): 287–325.
105.
SojerM., and HenkelJ. (2010). Code Reuse in Open Source Software Development: Quantitative Evidence, Drivers, and Impediments, Journal of the Association for Information Systems11 (12): 868–901.
106.
SonensheinS. (2014). How Organizations Foster the Creative Use of Resources, Academy of Management Journal57 (3): 814–848.
107.
SoukhoroukovaA., SpannM., and SkieraB. (2012). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product ideAs: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets, Journal of Product Innovation Management29 (1): 100–112.
108.
SpagnolettiP., RescaA., and LeeG. (2015). A Design Theory for Digital Platforms Supporting Online Communities: A Multiple Case Study, Journal of Information Technology30, 364–380.
109.
StankoM.A. (2016). Toward a Theory of Remixing in Online Innovation Communities, Information Systems Research27 (4): 773–791.
110.
StrumskyD., and LoboJ. (2015). Identifying the Sources of Technological Novelty in the Process of Invention, Research Policy44 (8): 1445–1461.
111.
StrumskyD., LoboJ., and Van der LeeuwS. (2012). Using Patent Technology Codes to Study Technological Change, Economics of Innovation and New Technology21 (3): 267–286.
112.
SusarlaA., OhJ.H., and TanY. (2012). Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from Youtube, Information Systems Research23 (1): 23–41.
113.
ThorénC., ÅgerfalkP.J., and EdeniusM. (2014). Through the Printing Press: An Account of Open Practices in the Swedish Newspaper Industry, Journal of the Association for Information Systems15 (11): 779–804.
114.
TuiteK., and SmithA.M. (2012) Emergent Remix Culture in an Anonymous Collaborative Art System, in Proceedings of the 8th AAAI Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (Toronto, Canada, 2012); Palo Alto: AAAI, pp. 16–23.
115.
UsherA.P. (2011). A History of Mechanical Inventions: Revised Edition, New York: Dover Publications.
116.
Van de VenA.H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, Management Science32 (5): 590–607.
117.
Van de VenA.H., PolleyeD., GarudR., and VenktaramanS. (1999). The Innovation Journey, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118.
Van DijkC., and Van Den EndeJ. (2002). Suggestion Systems: Transferring Employee Creativity into Practicable Ideas, R&D Management32 (5): 387–395.
119.
VenablesW.N., and RipleyB.D. (2013). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
120.
VitharanaP., KingJ., and ChapmanH.S. (2010). Impact of Internal Open Source Development on Reuse: Participatory Reuse in Action, Journal of Management Information Systems27 (2): 277–304.
121.
von HippelE.A. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
122.
von HippelE.A., and von KroghG. (2003). Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science, Organization Science14 (2): 209–223.
123.
von HippelE.A., and von KroghG. (2006). Free Revealing and the Private-Collective Model for Innovation Incentives, R&D Management36 (3): 295–306.
124.
von KroghG. (2012). How Does Social Software Change Knowledge Management? Toward a Strategic Research Agenda, Journal of Strategic Information Systems21 (2): 154–164.
125.
von KroghG., HaefligerS., SpaethS., and WallinM.W. (2012). Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development, Management Information Systems Quarterly36 (2): 649–676.
126.
WatsonS., and HewettK. (2006). A Multi-theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse, Journal of Management Studies43 (2): 141–173.
127.
WeitzmanM.L. (1998). Recombinant Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics113 (2): 331–360.
128.
WickhamH. (2009). ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, New York: Springer.
129.
WickhamH., and FrancoisR. (2016). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.5.0. [www document] https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (accessed 13th July 2016).
130.
WirthM., FriesikeS.; FlathC.M., and ThiesseF. (2015) Patterns of Remixes or Where Do Innovations Come From, in Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (Münster, Germany, 2015); Atlanta: AIS.
131.
YuL.L., and NickersonJ.V. (2011) Generating creative ideas through crowds: An experimental study of combination, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems (Shanghai, China, 2011); Atlanta: AIS.
