Information systems are a strong and ever-growing discipline of enormous relevance to today's informated world, and yet, as recent reviews have shown, there is still not an agreed and explicit conceptualization or definition of information. After an evaluative review of a range of theories of information, this paper develops and defends a particular theory, one that sees information as both objective and veridical. By objective, we mean that the information carried by signs and messages exists independently of its receivers or observers. The information carried by a sign exists even if the sign is not actually observed. By veridical, we mean that information must be true or correct in order to be information – information is truth-constituted. False information is not information, but misinformation or disinformation. The paper develops this theory and then discusses four contentious issues – information as objective rather than subjective; information as true or correct; information and knowledge; and information and the ambiguity of meaning. It concludes with a discussion of the practical implications of the theory.
AlterS. (2006). Goals and tactics on the dark side of knowledge management, in Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) (Vol. 7, pp. 144a).
2.
AustinJ. (1962). How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BatesM. (2010). Information, in BatesM., and MaackM. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (3rd ed., pp. 2347–2360), Boca Raton: CRC Press.
4.
BatesonG. (1973a). Form, substance and difference, in BatesonG. (ed.) Steps to an Ecology of Mind (pp. 423–440), London: Paladin.
5.
BatesonG. (1973b). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Hertfordshire: Granada Publishing.
6.
Bekenstein. (2003). Information in the holographic universe. Scientific American, 289, 58–65.
7.
Beynon-DaviesP. (2010). Significance: Exploring the nature of information, systems and technology, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BhaskarR. (1978). A Realist Theory of Science, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
9.
BoussoR. (2002). The Holographic Principle, Reviews of Modern Physics74: 825–874.
10.
BrierS. (2001). Cybersemiotics: A reconceptualization of the foundation for information science, Systems Research and Behavioral Science18: 421–427.
11.
BrierS. (2008). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
BrillouinL. (1929). Science and Information Theory (2nd ed.), New York: Academic.
13.
BucklandM.K. (1991). Information as Thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42: 351–360.
14.
Burton-JonesA., and GrangeC. (2012). From Use to Effective Use: A representation theory perspective, Information Systems Research24: 632–658.
15.
CapurroR., and HjorlandB. (2003). The Concept of Information, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology37: 343–411.
16.
CaseD. (2012). Looking for Information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behavior (3rd ed.), Bingley: Emerald.
17.
ChatterjeeS., and SarkerS. (2013). Infusing Ethical Considerations in Knowledge Management Scholarship: Toward a research agenda, Journal of the Association for Information Systems14: 452–481.
18.
ChatterjeeS., SarkerS., and FullerM.A. (2009). A Deontological Approach to Designing Ethical Collaboration, Journal of the Association for Information Systems10: 138–169.
19.
ChecklandP. (1985). From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s, Journal of the Operational Research Society36: 757–768.
20.
ChecklandP., and HolwellS. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, Chichester: Wiley.
21.
ChecklandP., and ScholesJ. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: Wiley.
22.
ColburnT. (2000). Philosophy and Computer Science, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
23.
CrnkovicG., and HofkirchnerW. (2011). Floridi's Open Problems in Philosophy of Information Ten Years After, Information2:1–31.
24.
DaftR.L., and LengelR.H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science32: 554–571.
25.
de SaussureF. (1960). Course in General Linguistics, London: Peter Owen.
26.
Díaz NafríaJ. (2010). What is information? What is information? A Multidimensional Concern, TripleC, 8: 77–108.
27.
DretskeF. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
DretskeF. (1995). Naturalizing the Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
29.
EssC. (2014). Floridi's Philosophy of Information and Information Ethics: Current Perspectives, Future Directions, The Information Society: An International Journal25: 159–168.
30.
FetzerJ. (2004). Information: Does it Have to be True?Minds and Machines14: 223–229.
31.
FieldH. (1972). Tarski's thEory of Truth, The Journal of Philosophy, pp 347–375.
32.
FloridiL. (2002). What is the Philosophy of Information?Metaphilosophy33: 123–145.
33.
FloridiL. (2004a). Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information, Metaphilosophy35: 554–582.
34.
FloridiL. (2004b). Outline of a Theory of Strongly Semantic Information, Minds and Machines14:197–221.
35.
FloridiL. (2008). The method of levels of abstraction, Minds and Machines18: 303–329.
36.
FloridiL. (2009a). The Information Society and its Philosophy: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Philosophy of Information, its Nature, and Future Developments, Information Society25: 153–158.
37.
FloridiL. (2009b). Outline of a Theory of Truth as Correctness for Semantic Information, Triple C: Cognition, Communication and Co-operation7: 142–157.
38.
FloridiL. (2009c). Philosophical Conceptions of Information, in SommarugaG. (ed.) Formal Theories of Information (pp. 13–53). Berlin: Springer.
39.
FloridiL. (2011a). The Philosophy of Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
FloridiL. (2011b). Semantic Information and the Correctness Theory of Truth, Erkenntnis74: 147–175.
41.
FloridiL. (2012). Semantic Information and the Network Theory of Account, Synthese184: 431–454.
42.
FloridiL. (2014). Perception and Testimony as Data Providers, in Ibekwe-SanJuanF., and DousaT. (eds.) Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge (pp. 71–95), New York: Springer.
43.
FregeG. (1952). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford: Blackwell.
44.
FrickeM. (2009). The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy, Journal of Information Science35: 131–142.
45.
FurneauxB., and WadeM. (2011). Information in Information Systems Research: The State of Practice and Guidance for the Future. In, Lausanne: IMD.
46.
GlanzbergM. (2014). Truth, in ZaltaE. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition): Stanford University.
47.
GleickJ. (2012). The Information, London: Fourth Estate.
48.
HabermasJ. (1979). What is Universal Pragmatics? in J. Habermas (ed.)Communication and the Evolution of Society (pp. 1–68), London: Heinemann.
49.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, London: Heinemann.
50.
HabermasJ. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Oxford: Polity Press.
51.
HartleyR. (1928). Transmission of Information, Bell Systems Technical Journal7: 535–563.
52.
HevnerA.R., MarchS.T., ParkJ., and RamS. (2004). Design science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly28: 75–105.
53.
HofkirchnerW. (2013). Emergent Information: A unified theory of information framework, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
54.
HorganT. (2001). Contextual Semantics and Metaphysical Realism: Truth as indirect correspondence, in LynchM. (ed.) The Nature of Truth: Classic and contemporary perspectives (pp. 67–95), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
HorwichP. (1991). Truth, Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
Ibekwe-SanJuanF., and DousaT. (2014). Theories of Information, in Communication and Knowledge, New York: Springer.
57.
JonesM., and KarstenH. (2008). Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly32: 127–157.
58.
KettingerW.J., and LiY. (2010). The Infological Equation Extended: Towards conceptual clarity in the relationship between data, information and knowledge, European Journal of Information Systems19: 409–421.
59.
KorzybskiI. (1933). Science and Sanity: An introduction to non-aristotelian systems and general semantics, Fort Worth: Institute of General Semantics.
60.
KuukkanenJ.-M. (2007). Kuhn, the Correspondence Theory of Truth and Coherentist Epistemology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A38: 555–566.
61.
LakoffG., and JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
LandauerR. (1991). Information is Physical, Physics Today44: 23–29.
63.
LangeforsB. (1973). Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems, Philadelphia, PA: Auerbach Publishers.
64.
LangeforsB. (1980). Infological Models and Information User Views, Information Systems Journal5: 17–32.
65.
LeeA. (2014). Theory is king? But First, what is Theory?Journal of Information Technology29: 350–352.
66.
LeeA.S., and HovorkaD. (2015). Crafting theory to satisfy the requirements of interpretation, in 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (pp. 4918–4927) Hawaii: IEEE
67.
LeeA.S., ThomasM., and BaskervilleR.L. (2015). Going Back to Basics in Design Science: From the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact, Information Systems Journal25: 5–21.
68.
LuhmannN. (1990a). The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and a Reality That Remains Unknown, in KrohnW. (ed.) Selforganization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
69.
LuhmannN. (1990b). Meaning as Sociology's Basic Concept, in LuhmannN. (ed.) Essays in Self-Reference (pp. 21–79), New York: Columbia University Press.
70.
LuhmannN. (1993). Ecological Communication: Coping with the Unknown, Systems Practice6: 527–540.
71.
LuhmannN. (1995 (original 1984)). Social Systems,.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
72.
LuhmannN. (2000). The Reality of the Mass Media, Cambridge: Polity Press. Lynch, M. (2001). The Nature of Truth: Classic and contemporary perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73.
MackayD. (1956). The Place of “meaning” in the Theory of Information, in CherryC. (ed.) Information Theory: Third London symposium (pp. 215–225), London: Butterworth.
74.
MackayD. (1969). Information, Mechanism and Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75.
MalhotraN.K., SungS.K., and AgarwalJ. (2004). Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model, Information Systems Research15: 336–355.
76.
MaturanaH., and VarelaF. (1980a). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The realization of the living, Dordrecht: Reidel.
77.
MaturanaH., and VarelaF. (1980b). Autopoiesis: The organization of the living, in MaturanaH., and VarelaF. (eds.) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The realization of the living (pp. 63–134), Dordrecht: Reidel.
78.
McKinneyE., and YoosC. (2010). Information about information: A taxonomy of views, MIS Quarterly34: 329–344.
79.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
80.
Merleau-PontyM. (1963). The Structure of Behaviour, Boston: Beacon Press.
81.
MingersJ. (1995). Information and Meaning: Foundations for an intersubjective account, Information Systems Journal5: 285–306.
82.
MingersJ. (1996). An Evaluation of Theories of Information with Regard to the Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Information Systems, Systems Practice9: 187–209.
83.
MingersJ. (2001). Embodying Information Systems: The contribution of phenomenology, Information and Organization11: 103–128.
84.
MingersJ. (2002). Can Social Systems be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's Social Theory, Sociological Review50: 278–299.
85.
MingersJ. (2004). Re-establishing the real: Critical realism and information systems research, in MingersJ., and WillcocksL. (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (pp. 372–406), London: Wiley.
86.
MingersJ. (2008). Management Knowledge and Knowledge Management: Realism and Forms of Truth, Knowledge Management Research and Practice6: 62–76.
87.
MingersJ. (2013). Prefiguring Floridi's Theory of Semantic Information, Triple C: Communication, Capitalism and Critique11: 388–401.
88.
MingersJ. (2014). Systems Thinking, Critical Realism and Philosophy: A confluence of ideas, London: Routledge.
89.
MingersJ., and WillcocksL. (2014). An Integrative Semiotic Framework for Information Systems: The social, personal and material worlds, Information and Organization24: 48–70.
90.
MingersJ., and WillcocksL. (2017). An integrative semiotic methodology for IS research, Information and Organization, forthcoming.
91.
MorrisC. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs, in NeurathO. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (Vol. 1), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
MullerI. (2007). A History of Thermodynamics: The doctrine of energy and entropy, Berlin: Springer.
93.
MutchA. (1999). Critical Realism, Managers and Information, British Journal of Management10: 323–333.
NielsenM., and ChuangI. (2000). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96.
OrlikowskiW., and IaconoC. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research12: 121.
97.
PeirceC.S. (1907). The Charles S. Peirce Papers, Cambridge: The Houghton Library, Harvard University.
98.
PeirceC.S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 8), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
99.
PeirceC.S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Peirce Edition Project: Indiana University Press.
100.
PetterS., StraubD., and RaiA. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research, MIS Quarterly pp 623–656.
101.
PriceR., NeigerD., and ShanksG. (2008). Developing a Measurement Instrument for Subjective Aspects of Information Quality, Communications of the Association for Information Systems22: 3.
102.
RavinY., and LeacockC. (2000). Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, Cambridge: MIT Press.
103.
RobinsonL., and BawdenD. (2014). Mind the Gap: Transitions between concepts of information in varied domains, in Ibekwe-SanJuanF., and DousaT. (eds.) Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge (pp. 121–141), New York: Springer.
104.
RocknessH., and RocknessJ. (2005). Legislated Ethics: From enron to sarbanesoxley, the impact on corporate America, Journal of Business Ethics57: 31–54.
105.
RowleyJ. (2007). The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy, Journal of Information Science33: 163–180.
106.
RussellB. (1910). On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood, in RussellB. (ed.) Philosophical Essays, London: George Allen and Unwin.
107.
SchultzeU. (2000). A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work, MIS Quarterly24: 3–41.
108.
SchultzeU., and LeidnerD. (2002). Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions, MIS Quarterly26: 213–242.
109.
SearleJ. (1969). Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
110.
Sequoiah-GraysonS. (2007). The Metaphilosophy of Information, Minds and Machines17: 331–344.
111.
ShannonC., and WeaverW. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
112.
SmithC., and ZielinskiS. (2014). Brainy Birds, Scientific American310: 46–51.
113.
Spencer-BrownG. (1972). Laws of Form, New York: Julien Press.
114.
StahlB.C. (2007). ETHICS, Morality and Critique: An Essay on Enid Mumford's Socio-Technical Approach, Journal of the Association for Information Systems8: 479–490.
115.
StamperR. (1973). Information in Business and Administrative Systems, New York: Wiley.
116.
StamperR. (1991). The Semiotic Framework for Information Systems Research, in NissenH.-E., KleinH., and HirscheimR. (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions (pp. 515–528), Amsterdam: North Holland.
StrongD.M., and VolkoffO. (2010). Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact, MIS Quarterly34: 731–756.
119.
SuchmanL. (1990). What is human–machine interaction? in S. Robertson, W. Zachary and J. Black (eds.)Cognition, Computing, and Cooperation, Ablex.
120.
TarskiA. (1944). The Semantic Conception of truTh, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research4: 341–375.
121.
TilsonD., LyytinenK., and SørensenC. (2010). Research Commentary-Digital Infrastructures: The missing IS research Agenda, Information Systems Research21: 748–759.
122.
TrussL. (2003). Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The zero tolerance approach to punctuation, New York: Barnes and Noble.
123.
TuomiI. (1999). Data is More Than Knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and knowledge memory, Journal Management Information Systems16: 103–117.
124.
TurilliM., and FloridiL. (2009). The ethics of information Transparency, Ethics and Information Technology11: 105–112.
125.
VarelaF., ThompsonE., and RoschE. (1991). The Embodied Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press.
126.
WandY., and WeberR. (1990). An Ontological Model of an Information System, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering16: 1282–1292.
127.
WandY., and WeberR. (1995). On the deep structure of information systems, Information Systems Journal5: 203–223.
128.
WatsonR. (2014). A Personal Perspective on a Conceptual Foundation for Information Systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems15: 514–535.
129.
WeberR. (2003). Still desperately seeking the IT artifact, MIS Quarterly27: 183–194.
130.
WebsterF. (2014). Theories of the Information Society, New York: Routledge.
131.
WeinerN. (1948). Cybernetics: Or communication and control in the animal and the machine, Cambridge: MIT Press.
132.
WheelerJ. (1990). Information, Physics, Quantum: The search for links, in ZurekW. (ed.) Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information (pp. 309–336), Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.
133.
WixomB.H., and ToddP.A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance, Information Systems Research16: 85–102.
134.
ZinsC. (2007). Conceptual Approaches to Defining Data, Information and Knowledge, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58: 479–493.
