Computerization has transformed financial markets with high frequency trading displacing human activity with proprietary algorithms to lower latency, reduce intermediary costs, enhance liquidity and increase transaction speed. Following the “Flash Crash” of 2010 which saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunge 1000 points within minutes, high frequency trading has come under the radar of multi-jurisdictional regulators. Combining a review of the extant literature on high frequency trading with empirical data from interviews with financial traders, computer experts and regulators, we develop concepts of regulatory adaptation, technology asymmetry and market ambiguity to illustrate the ‘dark art’ of high frequency trading. Findings show high frequency trading is a multi-faceted, complex and secretive practice. It is implicated in market events, but correlation does not imply causation, as isolating causal mechanisms from interconnected automated financial trading is highly challenging for regulators who seek to monitor algorithmic trading across multiple jurisdictions. This article provides information systems researchers with a set of conceptual tools for analysing high frequency trading.
AitkenM. J., dimmingD. J., & ZhanF. (2014). Trade Size. High Frequency Trading, and Co-Location Around the World, European Journal of Finance, 6, 1–21.
3.
AldridgeI. (2013). High Frequency Trading: A Practical Guide to Algorithmic Strategies and Trading Systems.Hoboken: Wiley Trading, John Wiley & Sons.
4.
AngelJ. J. (2014). When Finance Meets Physics: The Impact of the Speed of Light on Financial Markets and their Regulation. The Financial Review, 49(2), 1–15.
5.
AvisonD., & MalaurentJ. (2014). Is Theory King? Questioning the Theory Fetish in Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology, 29, 327–336.
6.
BambergerK. A. (2009). Technologies of Compliance: Risk and Regulation in a Digital Age. Texas Law Review, 88, 669.
BiaisB., FoucaultT., and MoinasS. (2011). Equilibrium Algorithmic Trading, Working Paper, Universite of Toulouse.
11.
BlocherJ., CooperR. A., SeddonJ., & Van VlietB. (2016). Phantom Liquidity and High Frequency Quoting. Journal of Trading, 11(3), 6–15.
12.
BodekH. (2013). The Problem of HFT: Collected Writings on High Frequency Trading & Stock Market Structure Reform.Decimus Capital Markets.
13.
BrogaardJ., HagströmerB., NordénL., & RiordanR. (2015). Trading Fast and Slow: Colocation and Liquidity. Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3407–3443.
14.
BrogaardJ., HendershottT., & RiordanR. (2014). High-frequency Trading and Price Discovery. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 2267–2306.
15.
BudishE., CramtonP., & ShimJ. (2015). The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(4), 1547–1621.
CarloJ. L., LyytinenK., & RoseG. M. (2011). Internet Computing as a Disruptive Information Technology Innovation: The Role of Strong Order Effects. Information Systems Journal, 21(1), 91–122.
ChaboudA. P., ChiquoineB., HjalmarssonE., & VegaC. (2014). Rise of the Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2045–2084.
DehningB., RichardsonV., & ZmudR. (2003). The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments. MIS Quarterly, 34(5), 717–737.
29.
DuhiggC. (2009). Stock Traders find Speed Pays in Milliseconds. The New York Times, New York, p. 23.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management, 14(4), 532–549.
33.
EllsbergD. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. doi:10.2307/1884324.
34.
EngE. M., FankR., & LynE. O. (2013). Finding Best Execution in the Dark: Market Fragmentation and the Rise of Dark Pools. Journal of International Business and Law, 12(1), 39–50.
Foresight. (2012). The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets.The Government Office of Science, London: Final Project Report.
40.
FunkR. J., & HirschmannD. (2014). Derivatives and Deregulation: Financial Innovation and the Demise of Glass-Steagall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 669–704.
41.
GioiaD. A., CorleyK. G., & HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
42.
GioiaD. A., & PitreE. (1990). Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.
43.
GoldsteinM. A., KumarP., & GravesF. C. (2014). Computerized and High-Frequency Trading. The Financial Review, 49, 177–202.
44.
GomberP., ArndtB., LutatM., and UhleT. (2011). High Frequency Trading.E-Finance Lab.Goethe University, Frankfurt, [www article] http://ssm.com/abstract+1858626.
45.
GrahamJ. R., HarveyC. R., & HuangH. H. (2009). Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias. Management Science, 55(7), 1094–1106.
46.
GubaE., & LincolnY. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In DenzinN., & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
KirilenkoA. A., KyleA. S., MehrdadS., & TugkanT. (2016). The Flash Crash: High Frequency Trading in an Electronic Market. Journal of Finance, 1, 1–50.
55.
KirilenkoA. A., & LoA. W. (2013). Moore's Law versus Murphy's Law: Algorithmic Trading and its Discontents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 51–72.
56.
KozhanR., & ThamW. W. (2012). Execution Risk in High Frequency Arbitrage. Management Science, 58(11), 2131–2149.
57.
KumarP., GoldsteinM., & GravesF. (2011). Trading at the Speed of Light: The Impact of High Frequency Trading on Market Performance, Regulatory Oversight, and Securities Litigation.San Francisco: The Brattle Group.
LockeE. A. (2007). The Case for Inductive Theory Building?Journal of Management, 33(6), 867–890.
60.
LoebbeckeC., & PicotA. (2015). Reflections on Societal and Business Model Transformation arising from Digitization and Big Data Analytics: A Research Agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149–157.
61.
LucasH. C.Jr., AgarwalR., ClemonsE. K., El SawyO. A., & WeberB. W. (2013). Impactful Research on Transformational Information Technology: An Opportunity to Inform New Audiences. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 371–382.
62.
LyytinenK., & RoseG. (2003). The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 557–596.
MacKenzieD. (2015). Dark Markets. London Review of Books, 37(11), 29–32.
65.
MarkusM., SteinfieldC. W., WigandR. T., & MintonG. (2006). Industry-wide IS Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the US Residential Mortgage Industry. MIS Quarterly, 30, 439–465.
66.
Mayer-SchönbergerV., & CukierK. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution that will Transform How we Live, Work, and Think.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
MenkveldA. J. (2014). High-Frequency Traders and Market Structure. The Financial Review, 49(2), 333–344.
69.
MenkveldA.J., and ZoicanM.A. (2014). Need for Speed? Exchange Latency and Liquidity. Discussion Paper Available at: TI 14–097/IV/DSF78, [www document] http://papers.tinbergen.nl/14097.pdf.
MuniesaF., ChabertD., & ScottS. V. (2011). Back Office Intricacy: The Description of Financial Objects in an Investment Bank. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 1093.
SEC. (2010b). SEC Approves Rules Expanding Stock-by-Stock Circuit Breakers and Clarifying Process for Breaking Erroneous Trades, Sept, [www article] http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-167.htm.
SeddonJ. J. M., & CurrieW. L. (2016). A Model for Unpacking Big Data Analytics in High Frequency Trading. Journal of Business Research, 61(August), 1–8.
ShorterG., and MillerR.S. (2014) High Frequency Trading: Background, Concerns, and Regulatory Developments. Congressional Research Service, 19: 7–5700, [www article] www.crs.gov.
StraubD., & WetherbeJ. (1989). Information Technologies for the 1990s: An Organizational Impact Perspective. Communications of the ACM, 32(11), 1328–1339.
