The move towards technological ubiquity is allowing a more idiosyncratic and dynamic working environment to emerge that may result in the restructuring of information communication technologies, and changes in their use through different user groups’ actions. Taking a ‘practice’ lens to human agency, we explore the evolving roles of, and relationships between these user groups and their appropriation of emergent technologies by drawing upon Lamb and Kling's social actor framework. To illustrate our argument, we draw upon a study of a UK Fire Brigade that has introduced a variety of technologies in an attempt to move towards embracing mobile and ubiquitous computing. Our analysis of the enactment of such technologies reveals that Bystanders, a group yet to be taken as the central unit of analysis in information systems research, or considered in practice, are emerging as important actors. The research implications of our work relate to the need to further consider Bystanders in deployments other than those that are mobile and ubiquitous. For practice, we suggest that Bystanders require consideration in the systems development life cycle, particularly in terms of design and education in processes of use.
AllenD.K., and ShoardM. (2005). Spreading the Load: Mobile information and communications and their effect on information overload, Information Research10(2), http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper227.html.
2.
ArnoldM. (2003). On the Phenomenology of Technology, Information and Organization13: 231–256.
3.
AvgerouC. (2000). IT and Organizational Change: An institutionalist perspective, Information Technology and People13(4): 234–262.
4.
BoudreauM., and RobeyD. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A human agency perspective, Organization Science16(1): 3–18.
5.
BrighamM., and IntronaL.D. (2006). Hospitality, Improvisation and Gestell: A phenomenology of mobile information, Journal of Information Technology21(3): 140–153.
6.
ButlerT. (2003). An Institutional Perspective on Developing and Implementing Intranet- and Internet-Based Information Systems, Information Systems Journal13(3): 209–231.
7.
CiborraC.U. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging The Wisdom of Systems, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
8.
CiborraC.U., BraaK., CordellaA., DahlbomB., FaillaA., HansethO., HepsoV., LjungbergF., MonteiroE., and SimonK.A. (2000). From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
9.
DahlbomB., and LjungbergF. (1998). Mobile Informatics, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems10(1 and 2): 227–234.
10.
DenningS. (2000). The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations, Butterworth Heinemann: Stoneham, MA.
11.
DervinB. (1989). Users as Research Inventions: How research categories perpetuate inequities, Journal of Communication39(3): 216–232.
12.
DesanctisG., and PooleM.S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use Adaptive Structuration Theory, Organization Science5(2): 121–147.
13.
DovidioJ.F. (1991). The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis: Paradigm and promise, Psychological Inquiry2(2): 126–128.
14.
FerneleyE.H., and LightB. (2006). Secondary User Relations in Emerging Mobile Computing Environments, European Journal of Information Systems15(3): 301–306.
15.
FriedmanA.L., and CornfordD.S. (1989). Computer Systems Development: History, Organization and Implementation, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
16.
GadamerH.-G. (1975). Truth and Method, Sheed and Ward, Continuum International Publishing Group: London.
17.
GellersenH. (2005). Smart-Its: Computers for artefacts in the physical world, Communications of the ACM48(3): 66.
18.
GreenN. (2002). Who's Watching Whom? Monitoring and accountability in mobile relations, in BrownB., GreenN., and HarperR. (eds.) Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age, London: Springer. pp. 32–45.
19.
HeathC., and LuffP. (2000). Technology in Action, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HirschP.M. (1997). Review Essay: Sociology without structure: Neoinstitutional theory meets brave new world, American Journal of Sociology102: 1702–1723.
21.
HirschheimR., KleinH.K., and LyytinenK. (1996). Exploring the Intellectual Structures of Information Systems Development: A social action theory analysis, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies6(1/2): 1–64.
22.
HowcroftD., MitevN., and WilsonM. (2004). What We May Learn From The Social Shaping of Technology Approach, in MingersJ., and WillcocksL. (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy of IS, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 329–371.
23.
JohansonB., WinogradT., and FoxA. (2003). Interactive Workspaces, IEEE Computer36(4): 99–103.
24.
KakiharaM., SorensenC., and WibergM. (2002). 1st Tokyo Mobile Roundtable, Mobile Innovation Research Program, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
25.
KarstenH. (1995). Converging Paths to Notes: In search of computer-based information systems in a networked company, Information Technology & People8(1): 7–34.
26.
KeebleL., and LoaderB.D. (eds.) (2001). Community Informatics: Shaping Computer-Mediated Social Relations, London: Routledge.
27.
KleinH.K., and MyersM.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–94.
28.
KleinrockL. (1996). Nomadicity: Anytime, anywhere in a disconnected world, Mobile Networks and Applications1(4): 351–357.
29.
KristoffersenS., and LjungbergF. (1999). Making Place to Make IT Work: Empirical explorations of HCI for mobile CSCW, in GROUP'99: Proceedings of The International ACM SIGGROUP Conference On Supporting Group Work, New York, Phoenix, USA: ACM Press, pp. 276–285.
30.
KristoffersenS., and LjungbergF. (2000). Mobile Informatics, in BraaK., SorensenC., and DahlbomB. (eds.) Planet Internet, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
31.
LahlouS., LangeheinrichM., and RockerC. (2005). Privacy and Trust Issues with Invisible Computers, Communications of the ACM48(3): 59–60.
32.
LambR., and KlingR. (2003). Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly27(2): 197–235.
33.
LambR., and SawyerS. (2005). On Extending Social Informatics From a Rich Legacy of Networks and Conceptual Resources, Information Technology and People18(1): 9–20.
34.
LandgrenJ. (2005). Supporting Fire Crew Sensemaking Enroute to Incidents, International Journal of Emergency Maintenance2(3): 176–188.
35.
LatanéB., and DarleyJ.M. (1970). The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?, Meredith Corporation: New York.
36.
LatanéB., and NidaS. (1981). Ten Years of Research On Group Size and Helping, Psychological Bulletin89(2): 308–324.
37.
LeeA.S., and BaskervilleR.L. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research14(3): 221–243.
38.
LjungbergF., and SorensenC. (2000). Overload: From transaction to interaction, in BraaK., SorensenC., and DahlbomB. (eds.) Planet Internet, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, pp. 113–136.
39.
LyytinenK., and YooY. (2002). Research Commentary: The next wave of nomadic computing, Information Systems Research13(4): 377–388.
40.
LyytinenK., YooY., VarshneyU., AckermannM.S., DavisG., AvitalM., RobeyD., SawyerS., and SorensenC. (2004). Surfing The Next Wave: Design and implementation challenges of ubiquitous computing environments, Communications of the Association for Information Systems13: 697–716, http://cais.aisnet.org/.
41.
MiddletonC.A., and CukierW. (2006). Is Mobile Email Functional Or Dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage, European Journal of Information Systems15(3): 252–260.
42.
MonkA., CarrollJ., ParkerS., and BlytheM. (2004). Why Are Mobile Phones Annoying?Behaviour and Information Technology23(1): 33–41.
43.
MumfordE. (1991). Participation in Systems Design - What can it offer?, in ShackelB., and RichardsonS.J. (eds.) Human Factors for Informatics Usability, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–290.
44.
MyersM.D. (1997). Interpretive Research in Information Systems, in MingersJ., and StowellF. (eds.) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline, London: The Mcgraw Hill Companies, pp. 239–266.
45.
NormanD. (1998). The Invisible Computer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
NuldenU. (2003). Investigating Police Practice for Design of IT, in Proceedings of CHI, ACM: New York, pp. 820–821.
47.
NygaardK. (1986). Program Development as a Social Activity, in KuglerH.-J. (ed.) Information Processing, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 189–198.
48.
OlsonG.M., and OlsonJ.S. (2000). Distance Matters, Human-Computer Interaction15: 139–178.
49.
OrlikowskiW. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations, Organization Science3(3): 398–427.
50.
OrlikowskiW.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations, Organization Science11(4): 404–428.
51.
OrlikowskiW., and IaconoC. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT Artefact, Information Systems Research12(2): 121–134.
52.
PettijohnT.F. (1992). Psychology: A Concise Introduction. 3rd edn, Guliford: The Dushkin Publishing Group Inc.
53.
PettyR.E., and CacioppoJ.T. (1996). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Westview Press: Boulder, CO.
54.
RussellD.M., StreitzN.A., and WinogradT. (2005). Building Disappearing Computers, Communications of the ACM48(3): 42–48.
55.
RussoN.L. (2000). Expanding the Horizons of Information Systems Development, in BaskervilleR., StageJ., and DegrossJ. I. (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 103–112.
56.
SnowdenD. (2002). Narrative Patterns: Uses of story in the third age of knowledge management, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management1(1): 1–5.
57.
SorensenC., and PicaD. (2005). Tales From The Police: Mobile technologies and contexts of work, Information and Organization15(3): 125–149.
58.
StreitzN., and NixonP. (2005). The Disappearing Computer, Communications of the ACM48(3): 33–35.
59.
SuchmanL. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
TapiaA.H., and SawyerS. (2006). The Sociotechnical Nature of Mobile Computing Work: Evidence from a study of policing in the United States, in StahlB., (ed.) Issues and Trends in Technology and Human Interaction, PA: Idea Group Publishing Hershey.
61.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
62.
WeilenmannA., and LarssonC. (2002). Local Use and Sharing of Mobile Phones, in BrownB., GreenN., and HarperR. (eds.) Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of The Mobile Age, London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 92–107.
63.
WeiserM. (1991). The Computer for the Twenty-first Century, Scientific American265(3): 94–104.
64.
WeiserM., and BrownJ.S. (1997). The Coming Age of Calm Technology, in DenningP., and MetcalfeR. (eds.) Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 75–85.
65.
WibergM., and LjungbergF. (2001). Exploring the Vision of ‘Anytime, Anywhere’ in the Context of Mobile Work, in MalhotraY. (ed.) Knowledge Management and Virtual Organisation, Idea Group Publishing, London, pp. 157–169.
66.
WireduG.O., and SorensenC. (2006). The Dynamics of Control and Mobile Computing in Distributed Activities, European Journal of Information Systems15(3): 307–319.
