DunleavyP., MargettsH., BastowS., and TinklerJ. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State and e-Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
FlyvbjergB., BruzeliusN., and RothengatterW. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts, (2007a). Department of Health: The National Programme for IT in the NHS, 20th Report, 11th April, The Stationery Office Limited, London.
6.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2007b). Delivering Successful IT-enabled Business Change, 27th Report, 14th May, The Stationery Office Limited, London.
7.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2006). Identity Card Technologies: Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence, Sixth Report, 20th July, The Stationery Office, London.
8.
KeilM. (1995). Pulling the Plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation, MIS Quarterly19(4): 421–447.
9.
KeilM., CuleP.E., LyytinenK., and SchmidtR.C. (1998). A Framework for Identifying Software Project Risks, Communications of the ACM41(11): 76–83.
10.
KlingR., and ScacchiW. (1982). The Web of Computing: Computer technology as social organization’, in YovitsM. (ed.) Advances in Computers, Vol. 21, New York: Academic Press.
11.
London School of Economics, (2006). The Identity Project: Research, Update January 2006, Policy Engagement Unit, Information Systems and Innovation Group, LSE, London.
12.
National Audit Office (2006). Achieving Innovation in Central Government Organisations, 25th July, The Stationery Office, London.
SauerC. (1993). Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach, Henley-on-Thames, UK: Alfred Waller.
15.
SauerC., and YettonP. and associates (1997). Steps To The Future, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
16.
SauerC., GeminoA., and ReichB. (2007). Managing Projects for Success: The Impact of Size and Volatility on IT Project Performance, Communications of the ACM, 50(November): forthcoming.
17.
WhitleyE., and HoseinI. (2007, June). Policy Engagement as Rigourous and Relevant Information Systems Research: The Case of the LSE Identity Project, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, St. Gallen.
18.
WhitleyE.A., HoseinI.R., AngellI.O., and DaviesS. (2007). Reflections on the Academic Policy Analysis Process and the UK Identity Cards Scheme, The Information Society23(1): 51–58.
19.
WillcocksL., and GraeserV. (2001). Delivering IT and e-Business Value, Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
WillcocksL., and GriffithsC. (1994). Predicting Risk of Failure in Large-Scale IT Projects, Technological Forecasting and Social Change27(2): 205–228.
21.
WillcocksL., and LacityM. (2006). Global Sourcing of Business and IT Services, London: Palgrave.
22.
WillcocksL., and LesterS. (eds.) (1999). Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, Chichester: Wiley.
23.
WillcocksL., PetherbridgeP., and OlsonN. (2002). Making IT Count: Strategy, Delivery and Infrastructure, Oxford: Butterworth.