In this paper we offer a critique of The National Programme for Information Technology’ (NPfIT) currently being undertaken in the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. We begin by offering a brief introduction to the project. Next, we review the lessons learned from a wide range of experience with IT and business change projects and comment on why changes in the NHS are likely to be harder than in most other organizations. We then elaborate the implications of these ideas and identify potential areas for change, with particular focus on the current guiding mindset that this project is about the provision of a technical infrastructure. We argue that this is, thus far, a technology project and question whether the current strategy is the most appropriate way forward to achieve service improvements. We suggest changes in the underlying mindset, along with the leadership, ownership, metrics and labelling of the project.
BevanH. (1996). Managing Today while Creating Tomorrow: The paradox of a re-engineering journey. Working article HWP 9630, Henley Management Group, Henley, UK.
4.
BrennanS. (2005). The NHS IT Project: The Biggest Computer Programme in the World…Ever’, Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
5.
British Computer Society Health Informatics Forum (2006). The Way Forward for NHS Health Informatics, London: British Computer Society.
6.
BrynjolfssonE., and HiltL.M. (1998). Beyond the Productivity Paradox, Communications of the ACM41(8): 49–55.
7.
ChecklandP. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30 year Retrospective, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
ChernsA. (1987). Principles of Socio-technical Design Revisited, Human Relations40: 153–162.
9.
CleggC.W. (2000). Sociotechnical Principles for System Design, Applied Ergonomics31: 463–477.
10.
CleggC.W., AxtellC., DamodaranL., FarbeyB., HullR., LloydjonesR., NichollsJ., SellR., and TomlinsonC. (1997). Information Technology: A study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors, Ergonomics40(9): 851–871.
11.
CleggC.W., and WalshS. (2004). Change Management: Time for a change?European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology13(2): 217–239.
CurrieW.L., and GuahM.W. (2007). A National Program for IT in the Organizational Field of Healthcare: A example of conflicting institutional logics, Journal of Information Technology22(3), in press.
14.
DrakaM., SadunR., and Van ReenenJ. (2006). Productivity and ICT: A review of the evidence. Discussion paper No. 749, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.
15.
GoldrattE.M., and CoxJ. (1984). The Goal.New York: North River Press.
16.
GibbsW.W. (1997). Taking Computers to Task, Scientific American277(July): 64–71.
17.
HammerM., and ChampyJ. (1993). Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution.London: Nicholas Brierley Publishing.
House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (2007). Department of Health: The National Programme for IT in the NHS, London: The Stationery Office Ltd.
KrumbholzM., GalliersJ., CoulianosN., and MaidenN.A.M. (2000). Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Packages in Different Corporate and National Cultures, Journal of Information Technology15(4): 267–279.
22.
LandauerT.K. (1995). The Trouble With Computers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
LaursenM.A., and MyersM.D. (1999). When Success Turns into Failure: A package driven business process re-engineering project in the financial services industry, Journal of Strategic Information Systems8: 395–417.
24.
McLoughlinI., and HarrisM. (1997). Innovation, Organizational Change and Technology, London: International Thomson Business Press. NHS England, [WWW document] www.nhs.uk (accessed 6th April 2007).
25.
NeelyA., GregoryM., and PlattsK. (1995). Performance Measurement Systems Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Operations and Production Management15(4): 80–116.
NortonJ. (2006). Quoted in The Way Forward for NHS Health Informatics, A report on behalf of the British Computer Society (BCS) by the BCS Health Informatics Forum Strategic Panel, 15.12.2006.
28.
ParrA., and ShanksG. (2000). A Model of ERP Implementation, Journal of Information Technology15: 289–303.
Royal Academy of Engineering and British Computer Society (2004). The Challenges of Complex IT Projects – The report of a working group from The Royal Academy of Engineering and The British Computer Society, London.
ScottJ.A., and KaindlL. (2000). Enhancing Functionality in an Enterprise Software Package, Information & Management37(3): 111–122.
33.
ShepherdC. (2006). Constructing Enterprise Resource Planning: A thoroughgoing interpretivist perspective on technological change, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology79: 357–376.
34.
SolowR.M. (1987). We'd Better Watch Out, New York Times, July 12th, Book Review.
35.
WillcocksL., and GrintK. (1997). Reinventing the Organization? Towards a critique of business process re-engineering, in McLoughlinI., and HarrisM. (eds.) Innovation, Organizational Change and Technology, London: International Thompson Business Press, pp. 87–110.
