We discuss three industry-level changes in the US residential real estate industry due, in part, to the take up and uses of information and communication technologies (ICT): (1) changes in the processes of transacting residential real estate, (2) changing roles for information, and (3) changing nature of intermediation, with the real estate transaction as more complex than the seller-agent-buyer simplification would suggest. We speculate that these changes are currently indeterminate due to ongoing confusion among the impacts of first and second-level effects, the roles of ICT in redefining access to data, and the importance of localized, social structures of real estate markets. To develop these findings, we take an institutional perspective and draw on multiple data collection methods. This provides us a means to highlight the value of an institutional perspective for studying industrial-level change.
AgarM. (2005). Agents in Living Color: Towards emic agent-based models, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation8(1): 18.
2.
AgreP. (1999). The Architecture of Identity: Embedding privacy in market institutions, Information, Communication and Society2(1): 1–25.
3.
AgreP. (2000). Infrastructure and Institutional Change in the Networked University, Information, Communication and Society3(4): 494–507.
4.
BaenJ., and GutteryR. (1997). The Coming Downsizing of Real Estate: Implications of technology, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management3(1): 1–18.
5.
BakerW. (1984). The Social Structure of a National Securities Market, American Journal of Sociology89(4): 775–811.
6.
BakosY. (1998). The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet, Communications of the ACM41(8): 35–42.
7.
BarF. (2001). The Construction of Marketplace Architecture in The BRIE-IGCC Economy Project Task Force on the Internet (eds.) Tracking a Transformation: E-commerce and the terms of competition in industries, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 27–49.
8.
BenjaminR., and WigandR.T. (1995). Electronic Markets and Virtual Value Chains on the Information Superhighway, Sloan Management Review36(2): 62–72.
9.
BoyceA., and RaineyL. (2002). The Growth in Online House Hunting: 40 Million Wired Americans Have Used the Internet to Search for Houses or Apartments (Data Memo), Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
10.
BurtR. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
ChristensenC. (1997). The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
CrowstonK., and MyersM. (2004). Information Technology and the Transformation of Industries: Three research perspectives, Strategic Information Systems13(1): 5–28.
13.
CrowstonK., SawyerS., and WigandR. (2001). Investigating the Interplay between Structure and Information and Communications Technology in the Real Estate Industry, Information Technology & People14(2): 163–184.
14.
CrowstonK., and WigandR. (1999). Real Estate War in Cyberspace: An emerging electronic market?International Journal of Electronic Markets9(1–2): 1–8.
15.
DiMaggioP., and PowellW. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
16.
DuttonW. (2004). Social Transformation in an Information Society: Rethinking Access to you and the World, Paris: UNESCO.
17.
HahnR., LitanR., and GurmanJ. (2005). Paying Less for Real Estate Brokerage: What can Make it Happen? (Working Paper 05–11). Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center.
18.
JudG., WinklerD., and SirmansG. (2002). The Impact of Information Technology on Real Estate Licensee Income, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education5(1): 1–16.
19.
KimG., and HeinemanM. (2003). More Than 12 Million Surfers Turn to the Web for Home Buying and Rental Research, New York: Nielsen//Net Ratings.
20.
KingJ., GurbaxaniV., KraemerK., McFarlanF., RamanK., and YapC. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research5(2): 139–169.
21.
KlingR. (1996). Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, 2nd ed., San Diego: Academic Press.
22.
KummerowM., and LunJ. (2005). Information and Communication Technology in the Real Estate Industry: Productivity, industry structure and market efficiency, Telecommunications Policy29(2/3): 173–191.
23.
LambR. (1997). Interorganizational Relationships and Information Services: How technical and institutional environments influence data gathering practices, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of California, Irvine.
24.
LeiferE., and WhiteH. (1987). A Structural Approach to Markets, in MizruchiM., and SchwartzM. (eds.) Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
MackenzieD. (1992). Economic and Sociological Explanation of Technical Change, in CoombsR., SaviottiP., and WalshV. (eds.) Technological Change and Company Strategy, London: Academic Press, pp. 26–48.
26.
MeyerJ., and RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
27.
MilesM., and HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
MuhannaW., and WolfJ. (2002). The Impact of E-commerce on the Real Estate Industry: Baen and guttery revisited, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management8(2): 141–153.
29.
National Association of Realtors, (2004). Realtors and Technology: The 2004 National Association of Realtors Technology Impact Survey Report, Washington, DC: National Association of Realtors, 6 pp.
30.
NohriaN., and EcclesR. (1992). Networks and Organizations: Structure, form, and action, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
PowellW. (1990). Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network forms of organisations, in StawB., and CummingsL.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behaviour, Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 295–336.
32.
SawyerS., CrowstonK., WigandR., and AllbrittonM. (2003). The Social Embeddedness of Transactions: Evidence from the residential real estate industry, The Information Society19(2): 135–154.
33.
ScottW. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
SproullL., and KieslerS. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
SwedbergR. (1994). Markets as Social Structures, in SmelserR., and SwedbergR. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 256–282.
37.
TseR., and WebbJ. (2002). The Effectiveness of a Web Strategy for Real Estate Brokerage, Journal of Real Estate Literature10(1): 121–130.
38.
WhiteH. (1981). Where do Markets Come from?American Journal of Sociology87(3): 517–547.
39.
WilliamsR., and EdgeD. (1995). The Social Shaping of Technology, Research Policy25: 865–899.
40.
WigandR., and BenjaminR. (1995). Electronic Commerce: Effects on electronic markets, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication1(3): 62–72.
41.
ZumpanoJ. (2002). The Possible Consequences of Bank Entry Into the Real Estate Brokerage Market: What the research tells us, Journal of Real Estate Literature10(2): 243–262.
