This paper critically analyses the nature and state of decision support systems (DSS) research. To provide context for the analysis, a history of DSS is presented which focuses on the evolution of a number of sub-groupings of research and practice: personal DSS, group support systems, negotiation support systems, intelligent DSS, knowledge management-based DSS, executive information systems/business intelligence, and data warehousing. To understand the state of DSS research an empirical investigation of published DSS research is presented. This investigation is based on the detailed analysis of 1,020 DSS articles published in 14 major journals from 1990 to 2003. The analysis found that DSS publication has been falling steadily since its peak in 1994 and the current publication rate is at early 1990s levels. Other findings include that personal DSS and group support systems dominate research activity and data warehousing is the least published type of DSS. The journal DSS is the major publishing outlet; US ‘Other’ journals dominate DSS publishing and there is very low exposure of DSS in European journals. Around two-thirds of DSS research is empirical, a much higher proportion than general IS research. DSS empirical research is overwhelming positivist, and is more dominated by positivism than IS research in general. Design science is a major DSS research category. The decision support focus of the sample shows a well-balanced mix of development, technology, process, and outcome studies. Almost half of DSS papers did not use judgement and decision-making reference research in the design and analysis of their projects and most cited reference works are relatively old. A major omission in DSS scholarship is the poor identification of the clients and users of the various DSS applications that are the focus of investigation. The analysis of the professional or practical contribution of DSS research shows a field that is facing a crisis of relevance. Using the history and empirical study as a foundation, a number of strategies for improving DSS research are suggested.
AlaviM., and CarlsonP. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development, Journal of Management Information Systems8(4): 45–62.
3.
AlaviM., and JoachimsthalerE.A. (1992). Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers, MIS Quarterly16(1): 95–116.
4.
AlaviM., and LeidnerD.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly25(1): 107–136.
5.
AlterS.L. (1980). Decision Support Systems: Current practice and continuing challenges, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
AnthonyR.N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A framework for analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
7.
ArnottD. (2004). Decision Support Systems Evolution: Framework, case study and research agenda, European Journal of Information Systems13(4): 247–259.
8.
ArrowK.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.
9.
BasuA., and BlanningR.W. (1994). Metagraphs: A tool for modelling decision support systems, Management Science40(12): 1579–1600.
10.
BenbasatI., and NaultB. (1990). An Evaluation of Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems, Decision Support Systems6: 203–226.
11.
BenbasatI., and ZmudR.W. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The question of relevance, MIS Quarterly23(1): 3–16.
12.
Benbunan-FichR., HiltzS.R., and TuroffM. (2002). A Comparative Content Analysis of Face-to-face vs. Asynchronous Group Decision Making, Decision Support Systems34: 457–469.
13.
BidgoliH. (1998). Intelligent Management Support Systems, Westport, CT: Greenwood.
14.
BottomW.P., and PaeseP.W. (1999). Judgement Accuracy and the Asymmetric Cost of Errors in Distributive Bargaining, Group Decision and Negotiation8: 349–364.
15.
BuiT., and JarkeM. (1986). Communication Design for Co-op: A group decision support system, ACM Transaction on Office Information Systems4(2): 81–103.
16.
CarlssonS., BrezillonP., HumphreysP., LunbergB.G., McCoshA., and RajkovicV. (eds.) (2000). Proceedings of IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Through Knowledge Management, Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology.
17.
CarlssonS.A., and LundbergB.G. (2000). Preface and Introduction, in Proceedings of IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference on Decision Support Through Knowledge Management, Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University/Royal Institute of Technology.
18.
CavayeA.L.M. (1996). Case Study Research: A multi-faceted research approach for IS, Information Systems Journal6: 227–242.
19.
ChaudhuryA. (1995). A Process Perspective to Designing Individual Negotiation Support Systems, Group Decision and Negotiation4(6): 525–548.
20.
ChenM. (1995). A Model-driven Approach to Accessing Managerial Information: The development of a repository-based executive information system, Journal of Management Information Systems11(4): 33–63.
21.
ChenW.S., and HirschheimR. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal14: 197–235.
22.
CoddE.F., CoddS.B., and SalleyC.T. (1993). Providing On-line Analytical Processing (OLAP) to User-analysts: An IT mandate, E.F. Codd and Associates. Unpublished manuscript.
23.
CooperB.L., WatsonH.J., WixomB.H., and GoodhueD.L. (2000). Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy at First American Corporation, MIS Quarterly24(4): 547–567.
24.
CourbonJ.C., GrajewJ., and ToloviJ. (1978). Design and Implementation of Interactive Decision Support Systems: An Evolutive Approach, Technical Report, Institute d'Administration des Enterprises, Grenoble: France.
25.
DattaA., and ThomasH. (1999). The Cube Data Model: A conceptual model and algebra for on-line analytical processing in data warehouses, Decision Support Systems27: 289–301.
26.
DavisonR. (1999). An Instrument for Measuring Meeting Success: Revalidation and Modification, Information and Management36: 321–328.
27.
DeardenJ. (1972). MIS is a Mirage, Harvard Business Review50(1): 90–99.
28.
DennisA.R., GeorgeJ.F., JessupL.M., NunamakerJ.F.Jr, and VogelD.R. (1988). Information Technology to Support Group Meetings, MIS Quarterly12(4): 591–624.
29.
DennisA.R., and GallupeR.B. (1993). A History of Group Support Systems Empirical Research: Lessons learned and future directions, in JessupL.M., and ValacichJ.S. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 3.
30.
DeSanctisG., and GallupeR.B. (1985). Group Decision Support Systems: A new frontier, Data Base16(2): 3–10.
31.
DeSanctisG., and GallupeR.B. (1987). A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems, Management Science33(5): 589–609.
32.
DevlinB.A., and MurphyP.T. (1988). An Architecture for a Business and Information System, IBM Systems Journal27(1): 60–81.
33.
DoukidisG.I., LandF., and MillerG. (1989). Knowledge Based Management Support Systems, Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
34.
DubinR. (1978). Theory Building, New York: The Free Press.
35.
EisenhartK.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review14: 532–550.
36.
EomH.B., and LeeS.M. (1990). A Survey of Decision Support System Applications (1971–1988), Interfaces20: 65–79.
37.
EomS.B. (1995). Decision Support Systems Research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science23(5): 511–523.
38.
EomS.B. (1996). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Research in Decision Support Systems Through Author Cocitation Analysis (1971–1993), Decision Support Systems16(4): 315–338.
39.
EomS.B. (1999). Decision Support Systems Research: Current state and trends, Industrial Management and Data Systems99(5): 213–220.
40.
EomS.B., and LeeS.M. (1993). Leading US Universities and Most Influential Contributors in DSS Research: A citation analysis, Decision Support Systems9(3): 237–244.
41.
FitzgeraldB. (2000). System Development Methodologies: The problem of tenses, Information Technology and People13(3): 13–22.
42.
FitzgeraldG. (1992). Executive Information Systems and their Development in the U.K.: A research study, International Information Systems1(2): 1–35.
43.
FraserN.M., and HippelK.W. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and resolution, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
44.
GalliersR.D. (1992). Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches, in GalliersR.D. (ed.), Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, London: Blackwell Scientific, pp. 144–162.
45.
GalliersR.D. (1994). Relevance and Rigour in Information Systems Research: Some personal reflections on issues facing the information systems research community, in GlassonB.C., HawryszkiewyczI.T., UnderwoodB.A., and WeberR. (eds.) Business Process Re-engineering: Information systems opportunities and challenges, Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland, pp. 93–101.
46.
GillensonM.L., and StutzJ.D. (1991). Academic Issues in MIS: Journals and books, MIS Quarterly15(4): 447–452.
47.
GorryG.A., and Scott MortonM.S. (1971). A Framework for Management Information Systems, Sloan Management Review13(1): 1–22.
48.
GrayP., AronofskyJ.S., HelmerO., KaneG.R., and PerkinsT.E. (1981). The SMU Decision Room Project. Proceedings of DSS-81: The First International Conference on Decision Support Systems (Atlanta, GA, 8–10 June 1981).
49.
GubaE.G., and LincolnY.S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in DenzinN.K., and LincolnY.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 105–117.
50.
HardgraveB.C., and WalstromK.A. (1997). Forums for MIS Scholars, Communications of the ACM40(11): 119–124.
51.
HevnerA.R., MarchS.T., ParkJ., and RamS. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly28(1): 75–106.
52.
HirschheimR. (1992). Information Systems Epistemology: An historical perspective, in GalliersR. (ed.), Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 28–60.
53.
HolsappleC., JohnsonL., ManakyanH., and TannerJ. (1994). Business Computing Research Journals: A normalized citation analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems11(1): 131–140.
54.
HuberG.P. (1984). Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems, MIS Quarterly8(3): 195–204.
55.
IivariJ. (1991). A Paradigmatic Analysis of Contemporary Schools of IS Development, European Journal of Information Systems1(4): 249–272.
56.
InmonW., and HackathornR. (1994). Using the Data Warehouse, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
57.
JarkeM., JelassiM.T., and ShakunM.F. (1987). MEDIATOR: Toward a negotiation support system, European Journal of Operations Research31(3): 314–334.
58.
JelassiM.T., KerstenG., and ZiontsS. (1990). An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support, in JelassiM.T., KerstenG., and ZiontsS. (eds.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
59.
KaplanR.S., and NortonD.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
60.
KarimA.S., HershauerJ.C., and PerkinsW.C. (1998). A Simulation of Partial Information Use in Decision Making: Implications for DSS design, Decision Sciences29(1): 53–85.
61.
KeenP.G.W. (1980). Adaptive Design for Decision Support System, Data Base12(1–2): 15–25.
62.
KeenP.G.W. (1997). Let's Focus on Action not Information: Information is a misleading and damaging IS term, Computerworld31(46): 100.
63.
KeenP.G.W., and GambinoA.J. (1983). Building a Decision Support System: The Mythical Man-month Revisited, in BennettJ.L. (ed.) Readings in Decision Support Systems, Reading, MA: Addis on-Wesley.
64.
KeenP.G.W., and Scott MortonM.S. (1978). Decision Support Systems: An organisational perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
65.
KendallK.E. (1997). The Significance of Information Systems Research on Emerging Technologies: Seven information technologies that promise to improve managerial effectiveness, Decision Sciences28(4): 775–792.
66.
KerstenG.E. (1987). On Two Roles Decision Support can Play In negotiation, Information Processing and Management23(5): 605–614.
67.
KerstenG.E., and SzapiroT. (1986). Generalized Approach to Modelling Negotiation, European Journal of Operations Research26(1): 142–149.
68.
KimballR. (1996). The Data Warehousing Toolkit, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
69.
KimballR., ReevesL., RossM., and ThornwaiteW. (1998). The Data Warehousing Lifecycle Toolkit, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
70.
KingJ.L., and LyytinenK. (2004). Reach and Grasp, MIS Quarterly28(4): 539–551.
71.
KockN. (1998). Can Communication Medium Limitations Foster Better Group Outcomes? An Action Research Study, Information and Management34: 295–305.
72.
KonsynskiB.R., KottemannJ.E., NunamakerJ.F.Jr, and StottJ.W. (1985). PLEXSYS-84: An integrated development environment for information systems, Journal of Management Information Systems1(3): 64–104.
73.
KraemerK.L., and KingJ.L. (1988). Computer-based Systems for Cooperative Work and Group Decision Making, ACM Computing Surveys20(2): 115–146.
74.
KuhnH.W., and TuckerA.W. (eds.) (1950). Contributions to the Theory of Games (Annals of Mathematics Study No. 24), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
LewisL.F., KelemanK.S., and GarciaJ.E. (1996). Possible Barriers and Challenges to the Adoption of Group Support Systems, Group Decision and Negotiation6(2): 189–194.
76.
LintonJ.D., and JohnstonD.A. (2000). A Decision Support System for Planning Remanufacturing at Nortel Networks, Interfaces30(6): 17–31.
77.
LowryP.B., RomansD., and CurtisA. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A scientometic study of information systems journals, Journal of the Association for Information Systems5(2): 29–77.
78.
MaloneT.W., and CrowstonK. (1994). The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination, ACM Computing Surveys26(1): 87–119.
79.
McCoshA.M. (2004). Keynote Address. The 2004 IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems (IFIP, Prato, Italy).
80.
McCoshA.M., and Scott MortonM.S. (1978). Management Decision Support Systems, London: Macmillan.
81.
McGrathJ.E., and HollingsheadA.B. (1993). Putting the ‘Group’ Back in Group Support Systems’: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements, in JessupL.M., and ValacichJ.S. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New perspectives, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 4.
82.
MeadorC.L., and NessD.N. (1974). Decision Support Systems: An approach to corporate planning, Sloan Management Review15(2): 51–68.
83.
MeredithR., ShanksG., ArnottD., and CarlssonS (eds.) (2004). Decision Support in a Complex and Uncertain World. Proceedings of the 2004 IFIP International Conference on Decision Support Systems (IFIP, Prato, Italy).
84.
MillsK. (2004). Raiding the Data Bank, The Australian IT Business, 16 October, pp. 1–4.
85.
MintzbergH. (1977). Impediments to the Use of Managerial Information (National Association of Accountants, New York and the Society of Management Accountants of Canada, Ontario, Canada).
86.
MorrisH.D., GrahamS., AndersenP., MoserK.D., CarrM., BlumsteinR., VessetD., and MartinezN. (2003). Financial Impact of Business Analytics: The key findings. IDC White Paper, 23 January.
87.
MylonopoulosN.A., and TheoharakisV. (2001). On-Site: Global perceptions of IS journals, Communications of the ACM44(9): 29–33.
88.
NandhakumarJ. (1996). Executive Information System Development: A case study of a manufacturing company, Journal of Information Technology11: 199–209.
89.
NashJ. (1950). The Bargaining Problem, Econometrica18(2): 155–162.
NCR (1998). How to Build a Data Warehouse, Data Warehousing Workshop: Module 4. [Course notes] NCR Corporation.
92.
NessD.N. (1975). Interactive Systems: Theories of Design, in Proceedings of the Joint Wharton/ONR Conference on Interactive Information and DSS, The Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.
93.
NunamakerJ.F.Jr, DennisA.R., ValacichJ.S., VogelD.R., and GeorgeJ.F. (1991). Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work, Communications of the ACM34(7): 40–61.
94.
NurmiH. (2001). Resolving Group Choice Paradoxes using Probabilistic and Fuzzy Concepts, Group Decision and Negotiation10: 177–198.
95.
OrlikowskiW.J., and BaroudiJ.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research2: 1–28.
96.
PearsonJ.M., and ShimJ.P. (1994). An Empirical Investigation into Decision Support Systems Capabilities: A proposed taxonomy, Information and Management27(1): 45–57.
97.
PervanG.P. (1998). A Review of Research in Group Support Systems: Leaders, approaches and directions, Decision Support Systems23(2): 149–159.
98.
PervanG.P., and AtkinsonD.J. (1995). GDSS Research: An overview and historical analysis, Group Decision and Negotiation4(6): 475–485.
99.
PoonP., and WagnerC. (2001). Critical Success Factors Revisited: Success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives, Decision Support Systems30: 393–418.
100.
PowellP.L., and JohnsonJ.E.V. (1995). Gender and DSS Design: The research implications, Decision Support Systems14: 27–58.
101.
PressL. (1992). Lotus Notes (Groupware) in Context, Journal of Organizational Computing2: 315–320.
102.
RaiffaH. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
103.
RangaswamyA., and ShellG.R. (1997). Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an ‘electronic bargaining table’, Management Science43(8): 1147–1163.
104.
RobeyD., BoudreauM.-C., and RoseG.M. (2000). Information Technology and Organizational Learning: A review and assessment of research, Accounting, Management and Information Technology10: 125–155.
105.
RockartJ.F. (1979). Chief Executives Define their own Data Needs, Harvard Business Review57: 81–93.
106.
RockartJ.F., and DeLongD.W. (1988). Executive Support Systems: The emergence of top management computer use, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin.
107.
RubinsteinA. (1982). Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model, Econometrica50: 97–109.
108.
SaundersC. (1998). The Role of Business in IS Research, Information Resource Management Journal11(1): 4–6.
109.
Scott MortonM.S. (1971). Management Decision Systems: Computer-based support for decision making, Boston, MA: Harvard University.
110.
ShimJ.P., WarkentinM., CourtneyJ.F., PowerD.J., ShardaR., and CarlssonC. (2002). Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology, Decision Support Systems33: 111–126.
111.
SilverM.S. (1991). Systems that Support Decision Makers: Description and analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
112.
SimonH.A. (1977). The New Science of Management Decision (rev. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Original work published 1960).
113.
SpragueR.H.Jr, and CarlsonE.D. (1982). Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
114.
StanekS., and SrokaH. (2001). Building Creativity into OSS Design Framework, Journal of Decision Systems10(3–4): 339–378.
115.
StohrE.A., and KonsynskiB.R. (eds.) (1992). Information Systems and Decision Processes, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
116.
ToddP., and BenbasatI. (1991). An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies, Information Systems Research2(2): 87–115.
117.
TolliverE.M. (1971). Myths of Automated Management Systems, Journal of Systems Management22(3): 29–32.
118.
TurbanE., AronsonJ.E., and LiangT.-P. (2005). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th edn., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
119.
VandenboschB., and HuffS.L. (1997). Searching and Scanning: How executives obtain information from executive information systems, MIS Quarterly21(1): 81–107.
120.
Von NeumannJ., and MorgensternO. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
121.
WagnerG.R., WynneB.E., and MenneckeB.E. (1993). Group Support Systems Facilities and Software, in JessupL.M., and ValacichJ.S. (eds.) Group Support Systems: New perspectives, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 2.
122.
WalshamG. (1995a). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method, European Journal of Information Systems4: 74–81.
123.
WalshamG. (1995b). The emergence of interpretivism in IS research, Information Systems Research6(4): 376–394.
124.
WalstromK.A., HardgraveB.C., and WilsonR.L. (1995). Forums for Management Information Systems Scholars, Communications of the ACM38(3): 93–107.
125.
WeberR. (1987). Towards a Theory of Artifacts: A paradigmatic base for information systems research, Journal of Information Systems1: 3–20.
126.
WebsterJ., and WatsonR.T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly26(2): xiii–xxiii.
127.
WhitmanM.E., HendricksonA.R., and TownsendA.M. (1999). Research Commentary. Academic Rewards for Teaching, Research and Service: Data and discourse, Information Systems Research10(2): 99–109.
128.
WixomB.H., and WatsonH.J. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success, MIS Quarterly23(1): 17–41.
129.
WoodJ.R.G., and Wood-HarperA.T. (1993). Information Technology in Support of Individual Decision-making, Journal of Information Systems3: 85–101.
130.
YinR.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
