Ardovini-BrookerJ. (2002) ‘Media attributions of blame and sympathy in ten rape cases’The Justice Professional, Vol. 15, No. 1: 3–18.
2.
BakerK. (2003) ‘Asking what before we ask why: taxonomy, etiology, and rape’Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 989: 288–299.
3.
BarthesR. (1972) Mythologies, translator Annette Lavers, New York: Hill & Wang.
4.
BergenR. (1998) ‘A woman scorned: acquaintance rape on trial’Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 27, No. 1: 98–99.
5.
Hill CollinsP. (1998) ‘The tie that binds: race, gender, and us violence’Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5: 917–938.
6.
HollowayK. (2006) ‘Coda: bodies of evidence’The Scholar and Feminist Online, Vol. 4, No. 3: available online at www.barnard.edu/sfonline.
7.
KramerK. (1994) ‘Rule by myth: the social and legal dynamics governing alcohol related acquaintance rapes’Stanford Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 1: 115–160.
8.
MatsudaM., LawrenceC., DelgadoR., and CrenshawK. (1993) editors, Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment, Boulder: Westview Press.
9.
SandayP. (1996) A Woman Scorned: Acquaintance Rape on Trial, New York: Doubleday.
10.
ThomasK. (1992) ‘Strange fruit’ in MorrisonT. (1992) editor, Race-Ing Justice, En-Gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality, New York: Pantheon Books.
11.
TomlinsonB. (1996) ‘The politics of Textual Vehemence, or go to your room until you learn how to act’Signs, Vol. 22, No. 1: 86–114.
12.
WilliamsP. (1991) The Alchemy of Race and Rights, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
WilliamsP. (1998) ‘On being the object of property’Signs, Vol. 14, No. 1: 5–24.