The benefits of family planning for those who desire it, and the possibilities of coercion against those who do not, are well-known aspects of international population policies. Family planning technologies, more than simply a means for preventing conception, are involved as identity artefacts in the construction of bodies and in the reproduction of power relations. As such, modern contraceptives, organized by and implemented through, donor-funded programmes constitute a discursive apparatus through which scattered hegemonies are disseminated. Women's use of family planning, traditional and modern, allows them to counter the expectations of these hegemonies at some times, and to embody them at others. Both service providers and clients, construct identities, referenced through women's bodies, using the discourses of international population control and family planning. This paper uses data collected in Tanzania to understand how notions of modernity in the family planning programme construct Tanzanian female bodies as ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’, how these discursive inequalities reflect and compound material disparities and how these logics come into play in the ways that women construct themselves and each other.
AdeokunL.A. (1991) Contraception and Quality of Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Application and Extension of a Framework, IUSSP Committee on Comparative Analysis of Fertility and University of Zimbabwe Seminar on The Course of Fertility Transition in Sub-Saharan Africa.Harare, Zimbabwe.
2.
Apffel-MarglinF. (1996) ‘Rationality, the body, and the world: from production to regeneration’ in Apffel-MarglinF., and MarglinS.A. (1996) editors, Decolonizing Knowledge: From Development to Dialogue, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 142–181.
3.
AppaduraiA. (1991) ‘Global ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology’ in FoxR. (1991) editor, Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research, 191–210.
4.
BarrettD., and TsuiA.O. (1999) ‘Policy as symbolic statement: international response to national population policies’Social Forces, Vol. 78, No. 1: 213–234.
5.
BegusS. (1998) ‘Contentious contraception: feminist debates about the use of long-acting hormonal contraceptives by adolescent urban women’ in Bar OnB.A., and FergusonA. (1998) editors, Daring to Be Good: Essays in Feminist Ethico-Politics, New York and London: Routledge, 208–223.
6.
BledsoeC.H. (2002) Contingent Lives: Fertility, Time and Aging in West Africa, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BledsoeC.H., BanjaF., and HillA. (1998) ‘Reproductive mishaps and western contraception: an african challenge to fertility theory’Population and Development Review, Vol. 24, No. 1: 15–57.
8.
BordoS. (1990) ‘Reading the slender body’ in JacobusM., KellerE.F., and ShuttleworthS. (1990) editors, Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science, New York and London: Routledge, 83–112.
9.
BourdieuP. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BriggM. (2002) ‘Post-development, Foucault and the colonisation metaphor’Third World Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3: 421–436.
11.
BrushP. (1998) ‘Metaphors of inscription: discipline, plasticity and the rhetoric of choics’Feminist Review, Vol. Spring, No. 58: 22–43.
12.
ChatterjeeN., and RileyN.E. (2001) ‘Planning an Indian modernity: the gendered politics of fertility control’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 26, No. 3: 811–845.
13.
ClarkeA.E., and OlesenV.L., editors (1999) Revisioning Women, Health, and Healing: Feminist, Cultural, and Technoscience Perspectives, New York and London: Routledge.
14.
CruikshankB. (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
15.
CrushJ. (1995) ‘Introduction’ in CrushJ. (1995) editor, Power of Development, London: Routledge.
16.
DoezemaJ. (2001) “Ouch! Western feminists’ ‘wounded attachment’ to the ‘Third World prostitute’ Feminist’Review, Vol. spring, No. 67: 16–38.
17.
FarmerP. (1999) Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues, Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
FergusonJ. (1994) The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development,’ Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1980) The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction, New York: Vintage Books.
20.
FreedmanL.P. (1999) ‘Censorship and manipulation of family planning information: an issue of human rights and women's health’ in MannJ.M., GruskinS., GrodinM.A., and AnnasG.J. (1999) editors, Health and Human Rights, New York and London: Routledge, 145–178.
21.
GinsburgF.D., and RappR., editors (1995) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
GroszE. (1994) Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
23.
GrewalI., and KaplanC. (1994) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
HarawayD.J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York and London: Routledge.
25.
HodgsonD., and WatkinsS.C. (1997) ‘Feminists and neo-malthusians: past and present alliances’Population and Development Review, Vol. 23, No. 3: 469–523.
26.
HuntN.R. (1988) “Le Bebe en Brousse’: European Women, African Birth Spacing and Colonial Intervention in Breast Feeding in the Belgian Congo’International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol. 21: 401–432.
27.
HuntN.R. (1999) A Colonial Lexicon of Birth Ritual, Medicalization, and Mobility in the Congo, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28.
JacobusM., KellerE.F., and ShuttleworthS. editors (1990) Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science, New York and London: Routledge.
29.
Johnston-HanksJ. (2002) ‘On the modernity of traditional contraception: time and the social context of fertility’Population and Development Review, Vol. 28, No. 2: 229–249.
30.
Johnson-OdimC. (1991) ‘Common themes, different contexts: Third World women and feminism’ in RussoA, TorresL., and MohantyC.T. (1991) editors, Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 314–327.
KuhlmannE., and BabitschB. (2002) ‘Bodies, health, gender – bridging feminist theories and women's health’Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 25, No. 4: 433–442.
33.
LockM., and KaufertP.A. editors (1998) Pragmatic Women and Body Politics, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
LockM., and Scheper-HughesN. (1996) ‘A critical-interpretive approach in medical anthropology: rituals and routines of discipline and dissent’ in SargentC.F., and JohnsonT.M. (1996) editors, Medical Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Method Revised Edition, Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 21–40.
35.
LongN., and Van Der PloegJ.D. (1989) ‘Demythologizing planned intervention: an actor perspective’Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 29, No. 3/4: 226–249.
36.
LykkeN., and BraidottiR. editors (1996) Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs: Feminist Confrontations with Science, Medicine and Cyberspace, London and New Jersey: Zed Books.
37.
MkiniF.A.H. (1980) ‘Current population policy in the United Republic of Tanzania’ in Economic Commission for Africa/International Labour Organisation (1980) editor, Final Report on the National Seminar on Population and Development in the United Republic of Tanzania, Arusha: UNFPA, 62–73.
38.
MohantyC.T. (1991) ‘Introduction: cartographies of struggle: Third World women and the politics of feminism’ in MohantyC.T., RussoA., and TorresL. (1991) editors, Third World Women and The Politics of Feminism, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
39.
NarayanL. (1997) Dislocating cultures: Identities, Traditions and third world Feminism.London and New York: Routledge.
40.
NgallabaS., KapigaS.H., RuyobyaI., and BoermaJ.T. (1991/92) Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 1991/1992, Columbia, MA: Macro International.
41.
NtukulaM. (1994) ‘The Initiation Rite’ in Tumbo-MasaboZ., and LiljestromR. (1994) editors, Chelwa, Chelwa: The Dilemma of Teenage Girls, Stockholm: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, 96–120.
42.
OudshoornN. (1996) ‘The decline of the one-size-fits-all paradigm, or, how reproductive scientists try to cope with postmodernity’ in LykkeN., and BraidottiR., editors, Contraception Across Cultures. Technologies, Choices, Constraints, Oxford and New York: Berg, 153–173.
43.
RabinowP. editor (1984) The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books.
44.
RaikesA. (1992) ‘Gender and the production of health care services: issues for women's roles in health development’IDS Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 1: 19–28.
45.
RicheyL.A. (2004) ‘From the policies to the clinics: The reproductive Health Paradox in post-adjustment health care’World Development, Vol. 32, No. 6: 923–940.
46.
RicheyL.A. (2003) ‘Women's reproductive health and population policy: a case study from tanzania’Review of African Political Economy, No. 96: 273–292.
47.
RicheyL.A. (1999) ‘Family planning and the politics of population in tanzania: international to local discourse’The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Sept.): 457–487.
48.
RosenauP.M. (1992) Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, Inroads and Intrusions.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
RussellA., and ThompsonM.S. (2000) ‘Introduction: contraception across cultures’ in RussellA., SoboE.J., and ThompsonM.S. (2000) editors, Contraception Across Cultures. Technologies, Choices, Constraints, Oxford and New York: Berg.
50.
RussellA., SoboE.J., and ThompsonM.S. editors (2000) Contraception Across Cultures. Technologies, Choices, Constraints, Oxford and New York: Berg.
51.
RutenbergN., and WatkinsS.C. (1997) ‘The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya’Studies in Family Planning, Vol. 28, No. 4: 290–307.
52.
SpeizerI.S., HotchkissD.R., MagnaniR.J., HubbardB., and NelsonK. (2000) ‘Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict clients’ access to contraceptive methods?’International Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 26, No. 1: March.
53.
Tumbo-MasaboZ. (1994) ‘Conclusions’ in Tumbo-MasaboZ., and LiljestromR. (1994) editors, Chelwa, Chelwa: The Dilemma of Teenage Girls, Stockholm: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.
54.
TurshenM. (1995) ‘The World Bank eclipses the World Health Organization’ACAS Bulletin, Vol. Winter/Spring, No. 44/45: 25–28.
55.
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (1994) UNFPA United Nations Population Fund in Tanzania: Commemorating 25 years of Dedication to Population Assistance, Dar es Salaam: UNFPA.
56.
United Republic of Tanzania (1994) Country Report on Population and Development, International Conference on Population and Development, in Cairo, Egypt, 5th–13th September, Dar es Salaam.
57.
USAID (1990) Family Planning Services Support: Technical Analyses, Dar es Salaam: USAID.
58.
Van EeuwijkB.O., and MlangwaS. (1997) ‘Competing ideologies: adolescence, knowledge and silences in Dar es Salaam’ in HarcourtW. (1997) editor, Power, Reproduction and Gender: The Intergenerational Transfer of Knowledge, London: Zed Books, 35–57.
59.
VaughanM. (1991) Curing their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness, Cambridge: Polity Press.
60.
WarwickD.P. (1982) Bitter Pills: Population Policies and Their Implementation in Eight Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WatkinsS.C. (2000) ‘Local and foreign models of reproduction in Nyanza Prozvince, Kenya, 1930–1998’Population and Development Review, Vol. 26, No. 4: 725–759.
62.
WeberM. (1978) Economy and Society, Berkeley: University of California Press, (first published 1922).
63.
WhitefordL.M., and MandesonL. editors (2000) Global Health Policy, Local Realities: The Fallacy of the Level Playing Field, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
64.
World Bank (1989) Report to the Consultative Group for Tanzania on The Government's Economic and Social Policy Reform Program, The World Bank Southern Africa Department.
65.
YanoshikK., and NorsigianJ. (1989) ‘Contraception, control, and choice: international perspectives’ in RatcliffK.S., FerreeM.M., and MellowG.O. (1989) editors, Healing Technology: Feminist Perspectives, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 61–92.
