AbernathyW.J., and UtterbackJ.M. (1978). Patterns of Industrial Innovation, Technology Review80 (7): 40–47.
2.
BasoleR.C. (2009). Visualization of Interfirm Relations in a Converging Mobile Ecosystem, Journal of Information Technology24 (2): 144–159.
3.
BasoleR.C., and KarlaJ. (2011). On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy, Business & Information Systems Engineering3 (5): 313–322.
4.
BasoleR.C., RussellM.G., HuhtamäkiJ., RubensN., StillK., and ParkH. (2015). Understanding Business Ecosystem Dynamics: A data-driven approach, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS)6 (2): 6.
5.
BoudreauK.J. (2012). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation, Organization Science23 (5): 1409–1427.
6.
CiborraC. (1996). The Platform Organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises, Organization Science7 (2): 103–118.
7.
ClarkK.B. (1985). The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution, Research Policy14 (5): 235–251.
8.
De ReuverM., SteinS., HampeF., and BouwmanH. (2010). Towards a Service Platform and Business Model for Mobile Participation, in Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business/Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable, Athens, Greece: IEEE.
9.
EatonB.D., Elaluf-CalderwoodS., SørensenC., and YooY. (2015). Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The case of Apple's iOS service system, MIS Quarterly: Special Issue on Service Innovation in a Digital Age39 (1): 217–243.
10.
GawerA. (ed.) (2009). Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11.
GawerA. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an integrative framework, Research Policy43 (7): 1239–1249.
12.
GawerA., and CusumanoM.A. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
GhazawnehA., and HenfridssonO. (2013). Balancing Platform Control and External Contribution in Third-Party Development: The boundary resources model, Information Systems Journal23 (2): 173–192.
14.
GonçalvesV., and BallonP. (2011). Adding Value to the Network: Mobile operators’ experiments with software-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service models, Telematics and Informatics28 (1): 12–21.
SelanderL., HenfridssonO., and SvahnF. (2013). Capability Search and Redeem Across Digital Ecosystems, Journal of Information Technology28 (3): 183–197.
17.
SørensenC., and LandauJ. (2014). We've Got 99 Problems, but a Phone ain't One: Mobile ICT and academic agility in information systems research, in Te'EniD., and AvgerouC. (eds.) Proceedings from the Twenty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv: ECIS.
18.
ThomasL., AutioE., and GannD. (2014). Architectural Leverage: Putting platforms in context, The Academy of Management Perspectives28 (2): 198–219.
19.
TilsonD., LyytinenK., and SørensenC. (2010a). Desperately Seeking the Infrastructure in IS Research: Conceptualization of ‘digital convergence’ as the co-evolution of social and technical infrastructures, in 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 43), Kauai, HI: IEEE.
20.
TilsonD., LyytinenK., and SørensenC. (2010b). Digital Infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda, Information Systems Research21 (5): 748–759.
21.
TilsonD., SørensenC., and LyytinenK. (2011). The Paradoxes of Change and Control in Digital Infrastructures: The mobile operating systems case, in The 10th International Conference on Mobile Business, Como, Italy: AIS.
22.
TilsonD., SørensenC., and LyytinenK. (2012). Change and Control Paradoxes in Mobile Infrastructure Innovation: The Android and iOS mobile operating systems cases, in 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 45), Maui, HI: IEEE.
23.
TiwanaA., KonsynskyB., and BushA.A. (2010). Platform Evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics, Information Systems Research21 (4): 675–687.
24.
UtterbackJ.M., and SuárezF.F. (1993). Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure, Research Policy22 (1): 1–21.
YooY. (2013). The Table has Turned: How can IS field contribute to the technology and innovation management?Journal of the AIS14 (Special Issue): 227–236.