AlvessonM., and SandbergJ. (2011). Generating Research Questions through Problematization, Academy of Management Review36 (2): 247–271.
2.
BaumeisterR.E., and LearyM.R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews, Review of General Psychology1 (3): 311–320.
3.
BoellS.K., and Cecez-KecmanovicD. (2014). Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches, Communications of the Association for Information Systems34: 257–286.
4.
GuillemetteM.G., and ParéG. (2012). Toward a NewTheory of the Contribution of the IT Function in Organizations, MIS Quarterly36 (2): 529–551.
5.
HammersleyM. (2001). On ‘Systematic’ Reviews of Research Litera-Tures: A ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield, British Educational Research Journal27 (5): 543–554.
6.
MacLureM. (2005). ‘Clarity Bordering on Stupidity’: Where's the quality in systematic review?Journal of Education Policy20 (4): 393–416.
7.
OatesB.J., EdwardsH.M., and WainwrightD.W. (2012). A Model-Driven Method for the Systematic Literature Review of Qualitative Empirical Research, in: International Conference on Information Systems.Orlando, FL: pp. 1–18.
8.
SchultzeU., and LeidnerD.E. (2002). Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions, MIS Quarterly26 (3): 213–242.
9.
StaplesM., and NiaziM. (2007). Experiences Using Systematic Review Guidelines, Journal of Systems and Software80 (9): 1425–1437.
10.
WebsterJ., and WatsonR.T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a literature review, MIS Quarterly26 (2): xiii–xxiii.
11.
WolfswinkelJ.F., FurtmuellerE., and WilderomC.P.M. (2013). Using Grounded Theory as a Method for Rigorously Reviewing Literature, European Journal of Information Systems22 (1): 45–55.