AdnerR. (2012). The Wide Lens: What successful innovators see that others miss, New York: Penguin.
2.
AvisonD., JonesJ., PowellP., and WilsonD. (2004). Using and Validating the Strategic Alignment Model, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems13 (3): 223–246.
3.
BarneyJ., and FelinT. (2013). What Are Microfoundations?The Academy of Management Perspectives27 (2): 138–155.
4.
BenbyaH., and McKelveyB. (2006). Using Coevolutionary and Complexity Theories to Improve IS Alignment: A multi-level approach, Journal of Information Technology21 (4): 284–298.
5.
BergeronF., RaymondL., and RivardS. (2001). Fit in Strategic Information Technology Management Research: An empirical comparison of perspectives, Omega29 (2): 125–142.
6.
BharadwajA., El SawyO.A., PavlouP.A., and VenkatramanN. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward a next generation of insights, MIS Quarterly37 (2): 471–482.
7.
BondS.D., CarlsonK.A., and KeeneyR.L. (2008). Generating Objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want?Management Science54 (1): 56–70.
8.
BradleyR.V., PrattR., ByrdT.A., OutlayC.N., and WynnD.E.Jr. (2012). Enterprise Architecture, IT Effectiveness and the Mediating Role of IT Alignment in US Hospitals, Information Systems Journal22 (2): 97–127.
9.
BrownC., and MagillS. (1994). Alignment of the IS Functions with the Enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents, MIS Quarterly18 (4): 371–403.
10.
BrynjolfssonE., and HittL. (1995). Information Technology as a Factor of Production: The role of differences among firms, Economics of Innovation and New technology3 (4): 183–200.
11.
BrynjolfssonE., and HittL. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending, Management Science42 (4): 541–558.
12.
ByrdT.A., LewisB.R., and BryanR.W. (2006). The Leveraging Influence of Strategic Alignment on IT Investment: An empirical examination, Information & Management43 (3): 308–321.
13.
ChanY.E., HuffS.L., BarclayD.W., and CopelandD.G. (1997). Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment, Information Systems Research8 (2): 125–150.
14.
ChanY.E., and ReichB.H. (2007). IT Alignment: What have we learned?Journal of Information Technology22 (4): 297–315.
15.
ChěnevertD., and TremblayM. (2009). Fits in Strategic Human Resource Management and Methodological Challenge: Empirical evidence of influence of empowerment and compensation practices on human resource performance in Canadian firms, The International Journal of Human Resource Management20 (4): 738–770.
16.
CraggP., KingM., and HussinH. (2002). IT Alignment and Firm Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems11 (2): 109–132.
17.
DavisF.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly13 (3): 319–340.
18.
DevinneyT.M. (2013). Is Microfoundational Thinking Critical to Management Thought and Practice?Academy of Management Perspectives27 (2): 81–84.
19.
DrazinR., and Van de VenA.H. (1985). Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly30 (4): 514–539.
20.
DruckerP.F. (2006). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and principles, New York: Harper & Row.
21.
EarlM.J. (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology, London: Prentice-Hall.
22.
EdwardsJ.R. (1994). The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a proposed alternative, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes58 (1): 51–100.
23.
FichmanR.G. (2004). Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for theory and practice, Information Systems Research15 (2): 132–154.
24.
FonstadN., and SubramaniM. (2009). Building Enterprise Alignment: A case study, MIS Quarterly Executive8 (1): 31–41.
25.
FossN.J., and LindenbergS. (2013). Microfoundations for Strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation, The Academy of Management Perspectives27 (2): 85–102.
26.
GerdinJ., and GreveJ. (2004). Forms of Contingency Fit in Management Accounting Research – A critical review, Accounting, Organizations and Society29 (3): 303–326.
27.
GerowJ.E., ThatcherJ.B., and GroverV. (2014). Six Types of IT-Business Strategic Alignment: An investigation of the constructs and their measurement, European Journal of Information Systems24 (3): 1–27.
28.
GroverV., and KohliR. (2012). Cocreating IT Value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments, MIS Quarterly36 (1): 225–232.
29.
GuptaA., and ZhdanovD. (2012). Growth and Sustainability of Managed Security Services Networks: An economic perspective, MIS Quarterly36 (4): 1109–1130.
30.
HammerM., and ChampyJ. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A manifesto for business revolution, London: Nicholas Brearley Publishing.
31.
HendersonJ., ThomasJ., and VenkatramanN. (1992). Making Sense of IT: Strategic alignment and organizational context.Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working Paper No. 3475–92.
32.
HendersonJ., and VenkatramanN. (1989). Strategic Alignment: A framework for strategic information technology management.Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working Paper No. 190.
33.
HendersonJ., and VenkatramanN. (1990). Strategic Alignment: A model for organizational transformation via information technology.Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working Paper No. 3223–90.
34.
HendersonJ.C., and VenkatramanN. (1993). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal32 (1): 4–16.
35.
HirschheimR., and SabherwalR. (2001). Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment, California Management Review44 (1): 87–108.
36.
IivariJ. (1992). The Organizational Fit of Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems2 (1): 3–29.
37.
KearnsG.S., and LedererA.L. (2000). The Effect of Strategic Alignment on the Use of IS-Based Resources for Competitive Advantage, Journal of Strategic Information Systems9 (4): 265–293.
38.
KearnsG.S., and LedererA.L. (2003). A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage, Decision Sciences34 (1): 1–30.
39.
KearnsG.S., and SabherwalR. (2007). Strategic Alignment between Business and Information Technology: A knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences, Journal of Management Information Systems23 (3): 129–162.
40.
KincaidH. (1996). Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing controversies in social research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KingM., and ClelandD. (1978). Strategic Planning and Policy, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
42.
KingW., and ZmudR. (1981). Managing Information Systems: Policy planning, strategic planning and operational planning. International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA.
43.
KingW.R. (1978). Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems, MIS Quarterly2 (1): 27–37.
44.
KleinK.J., TosiH., and CannellaA.A. (1999). Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments, Academy of Management Review24 (2): 248–253.
45.
KohliR., and GroverV. (2008). Business Value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times, Journal of the Association for Information Systems9 (1): 23–39.
46.
LuftmanJ., ZadehH.S., DerksenB., SantanaM., and RigoniE.H. (2013). Key Information Technology and Management Issues 2012-2013: An international study, Journal of Information Technology28 (4): 354–366.
47.
LuftmanJ.N. (1996). Competing in the Information Age: Strategic alignment in practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
MacDonaldK.H., and YappC. (1992). IT Strategies: Issues and Prescriptions, in Creating a Business-based IT Strategy, BrownA. (ed.), Chapman & Hall, London, UK, p. 243–260.
49.
McFarlanF.W., McKenneyJ.L., and PyburnP. (1983). The Information Archipelago-Plotting a Course, Harvard Business Review61 (1): 145–156.
50.
McLeanE.R., and SodenJ.V. (1997). Strategic Planning for MIS, New York: Wiley.
51.
MeilichO. (2006). Bivariate Models of Fit in Contingency Theory: Critique and a polynomial regression alternative, Organizational Research Methods9 (2): 161–193.
52.
MintzbergH., and WatersJ. (1985). Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal6 (3): 257–272.
53.
MooreS. (2012). How to align your IT services strategy with the business, CIO Magazine.
54.
OhW., and PinsonneaultA. (2007). On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches, MIS Quarterly31 (2): 239–265.
55.
OrdaniniA., and ParasuramanA. (2011). Service Innovation Viewed through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A conceptual framework and empirical analysis, Journal of Service Research14 (1): 3–23.
56.
PalmerJ.W., and MarkusM.L. (2000). The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing, Information Systems Research11 (3): 241–259.
57.
ParkerM., and BensonR. (1988). Information Economics: Linking business performance to information technology, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
58.
PhilipG., and BoothM. (2001). A New Six ‘S’ Framework on the Relationship between the Role of Information Systems (IS) and Competencies in ‘IS’ Management, Journal of Business Research51 (3): 233–247.
59.
PrestonD.S., and KarahannaE. (2009). Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A nomological network, Information Systems Research20 (2): 159–179.
60.
PrestonR. (2014). CIO worries: Security, talent and (sadly) ‘alignment’, Information Week.
61.
PyburnP.J. (1983). Linking the MIS Plan with Corporate Strategy: An exploratory study, MIS Quarterly7 (2): 1–14.
62.
QueirozM. (2014). Strategic information technology alignment: Conceptualization, measurement, and performance implications. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong.
63.
QueirozM., and ColtmanT. (2014). Reorienting the information systems function to support increasing levels of business service. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Auckland.
64.
RaghunathanB., and RaghunathanT. (1989). Relationship of the Rank of Information Systems Executive to the Organizational Role and Planning Dimensions of Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems6 (1): 111–126.
65.
RaiA., PavlouP.A., ImG., and DuS. (2012). Interfirm IT Capability Profiles and Communications for Cocreating Relational Value: Evidence from the logistics industry, MIS Quarterly36 (1): 233–262.
66.
RayG., MuhannaW.A., and BarneyJ.B. (2005). Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A resource-based analysis, MIS Quarterly29 (4): 625–652.
67.
ReichB.H., and BenbasatI. (1996). Measuring the Linkage between Business and Information Technology Objectives, MIS Quarterly20 (1): 55–81.
68.
ReichB.H., and BenbasatI. (2000). Factors that Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment between Business and Information Technology Objectives, MIS Quarterly24 (1): 81–113.
69.
ReynoldsP., and YettonP. (2015). Aligning Business and IT Strategies in MultiBusiness Organizations, Journal of Information Technology30 (1).
70.
RockartJ.F., EarlM.J., and RossJ.W. (1996). Eight Imperatives for the New IT Organization, Sloan Management Review38 (1): 43–55.
71.
SabherwalR., and ChanY.E. (2001). Alignment between Business and IS Strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders, Information Systems Research12 (1): 11–33.
72.
SabherwalR., HirschheimR., and GolesT. (2001). The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model, Organization Science12 (2): 179–197.
73.
SambamurthyV., BharadwajA., and GroverV. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly27 (2): 237–263.
74.
SambamurthyV., and ZmudR.W. (1999). Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A theory of multiple contingencies, MIS Quarterly23 (2): 261–290.
75.
SauerC., and YettonP.W. (1997). Steps to the Future: Fresh thinking on the management of IT-based organizational transformation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
76.
Scott-MortonM.S. (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation, New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
ShpilbergD., BerezS., PuryearR., and ShahS. (2007). Avoiding the Alignment Trap in Information Technology, MIT Sloan Management Review49 (1): 51–58.
78.
SpohrerJ., and MaglioP.P. (2008). The Emergence of Service Science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value, Production and Operations Management17 (3): 238–246.
79.
TallonP. (2000). A process-oriented assessment of the alignment of information systems and business strategy: Implications for IT business value. Ph.D. Thesis, Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine.
80.
TallonP., and KraemerK. (2003). Investigating the Relationship between Strategic Alignment and IT Business Value: The discovery of a paradox, in ShinN. (ed.) Creating Business Value with Information Technology, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing [www document] http://www.crito.uci.edu/papers/2002/AlignmentParadox.pdf (accessed 17 September 2014).
81.
TallonP., and PinsonneaultA. (2011). Competing Perspectives on the Link between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a mediation model, MIS Quarterly35 (2): 463–486.
82.
TallonP.P. (2008). A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy, Journal of Management Information Systems24 (3): 227–268.
83.
TallonP.P. (2012). Value Chain Linkages and the Spillover Effects of Strategic Information Technology Alignment: A process-level view, Journal of Management Information Systems28 (3): 9–44.
84.
TeeceD.J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal28 (1): 1319–1350.
85.
UmanathN.S. (2003). The Concept of Contingency beyond ‘It Depends’: Illustrations from IS research stream, Information & Management40 (6): 551–562.
86.
VenkatramanN. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, Academy of Management Review14 (3): 423–444.
87.
VenkatramanN. (1991). Information Technology-Induced Business Reconfiguration: The new strategic management challenge, in Scott-MortonM.S. (ed.) The Corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation, New York: Oxford University Press.
88.
VenkatramanN., and PrescottJ.E. (1990). Environmental-Strategy Coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications, Strategic Management Journal11 (1): 1–23.
89.
WeillP., and RossJ.W. (2004). IT Governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
90.
WheelerB.C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement, Information Systems Research13 (2): 125–146.
91.
WillamsonO. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
92.
WuS., StraubD., and LiangT.-P. (Forthcoming). How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers, MIS Quarterly.
93.
YaylaA.A., and HuQ. (2012). The Impact of IT-Business Strategic Alignment on Firm Performance in a Developing Country Setting: Exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation, European Journal of Information Systems21 (4): 373–387.