From ‘Theory Light’ to Theorizing: A Reaction to Avison and Malaurent

Alvesson M. , and Kärreman D. (2007). Constructing Mystery: Empirical matters in theory development, Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1265–1281.

Alvesson M. , and Sandberg J. (2013). Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research, Journal of Management Studies 50(1): 128–152.

Applegate L. , and King J. (1999). Rigor and Relevance: Careers on the line, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 17–18.

Bacharach S. (1989). Organizational Theories: Some criteria for evaluation, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 496–515.

Benbasat I. , and Zmud R. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The practice of relevance, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 3–16.

Benbasat I. , and Zmud R.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly 27(2): 183–194.

Bitektine A. (2007). Prospective Case Study Design: Qualitative method for deductive theory testing, Organizational Research Methods 11(1): 160–180.

Campbell D.T. (1990). The Role of Theory in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, in Dunnette M.D. , and Hough M. (eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 39–74.

Colquitt J. , and Zapata-Phelan C. (2007). Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A five-decade study of the academy of management journal, Academy of Management Journal 50(6): 1281–1303.

Darke P. , Shanks G. , and Broadbent M. (1998). Successfully Completing Case Study Research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism, Information Systems Journal 8(4): 273–289.

Davenport T. , and Markus M. (1999). Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 19–23.

Davison R.M. , and Martinsons M.G. (2011). Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant IS Research: An inclusive-exclusive perspective, Journal of Information Technology 26(4): 288–293.

Donaldson L. , Qiu J. , and Luo B. (2013). For Rigour in Organizational Management Theory Research, Journal of Management Studies 50(1): 153–172.

Dubé L. , and Paré G. (2003). Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations, MIS Quarterly 27(4): 597–636.

The Editors (2013). The Driver of New Theory Development in Management Studies: Imagination or rigour? Journal of Management Studies 50(1): 2012–2013.

Elsbach K. , Sutton R. , and Whetten D. (1999). Perspectives on Developing Management Theory, Circa 1999: Moving from shrill monologues to (relatively) tame dialogues, Academy of Management Review 24(4): 627–633.

Galliers R.D. (2011). In Celebration of Diversity in Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology 26(4): 299–301.

Gregor S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 30(3): 611–642.

Hambrick D. (2007). The Field of Management's Devotion to Theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal 50(6): 1346–1352.

Helfat C.E. (2007). Stylized Facts, Empirical Research and Theory Development in Management, Strategic Organization 5(2): 185–192.

Langley A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, The Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691.

Lee A. (1999). Rigor and Relevance in MIS Research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 29–33.

Lee A. (2011). IS Research Methods: Inclusive or exclusive? Journal of Information Technology 26(4): 296–298.

Markus M.L. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM 26(6): 430–444.

Miller D. (2007). Paradigm Prison, Or in Praise of Atheoretic Research, Strategic Organization 5(2): 177–184.

Mingers J. (2004). Realizing Information Systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems, Information and Organization 14(2): 87–103.

Myers M.D. (2011). Is There A Methodological Crisis? Journal of Information Technology 26(4): 294–295.

Robey D. (1996). Diversity In Information Systems Research: Threat, promise, and responsibility, Information Systems Research 7(4): 400–408.

Robey D. , and Markus M. (1998). Beyond Rigor And Relevance: Producing consumable research about information systems, Information Resources Management Journal 11(1): 7–16.

Rosemann M. , and Vessey I. (2008). Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The role of applicability checks, MIS Quarterly 32(1): 1–22.

Schultze U. (2000). A Confessional Account of An Ethnography About Knowledge Work, MIS Quarterly 24(1): 3–41.

Straub D. (2009). Why Top Journals Accept Your Paper, MIS Quarterly 33(3): iii–x.

Straub D. , and Ang S. (2011). Rigor And Relevance In IS Research: Redefining the debate and a call for future research, MIS Quarterly 35(1): iii–xi.

Straub D. , Boudreau M. , and Gefen D. (2004). Validation Guidelines For IS Positivist Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems. Vol. 13, Article 24.

Sutton R. , and Staw B. (1995). What Theory Is Not, Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3): 371–384.

Urquhart C. , and Fernández W. (2013). Using Grounded Theory Method in Information Systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths, Journal of Information Technology 28(3): 224–236.

Urquhart C. , Lehmann H. , and Myers M.D. (2009). Putting the ‘Theory’ Back Into Grounded Theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems, Information Systems Journal 20(4): 357–381.

Van de Ven A. (1989). Nothing Is Quite So Practical As A Good Theory, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 486–489.

Weick K.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn, New York: McGraw Hill.

Weick K.E. (1995). What Theory is Not, Theorizing Is, Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3): 385.