AgarwalR., and LucasH.C. (2005). The Information Systems Identity Crises: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research, MIS Quarterly29(3): 381–398.
2.
BarleyS.R. (2006). When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting, Academy of Management Journal49(1): 16–20.
3.
KleinH.K., and MyersM.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–93.
4.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
5.
LangleyA., SmallmanC., TsoukasH., and Van de VenA.H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow, Academy of Management Journal56(1): 1–13.
6.
PentlandB.T. (1999). Building Process Theory with Narrative: From description to explanation, Academy of Management Review24(4): 711–724.
7.
SarkerS., XiaoX., and BeaulieuT. (2013). Qualitative Studies in Information Systems: A critical review and some guiding principles, MIS Quarterly37(4): iii–xviii.
8.
WeickK.E. (1989). Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination, Academy of Management Review14(4): 516–531.
9.
WeickK.E. (1995). What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is, Administrative Science Quarterly40(3): 385–390.
10.
YooY. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A call for research on experiential computing, MIS Quarterly34(2): 213–231.
