AvisonD.E., and MyersM.D. (1995). Information Systems and Anthropology: An anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture, IT & People8(3): 43–56.
2.
BaconF. (1626/2004). The Instauratio Magna Part II: Novum Organum and Associated Texts, in ReesG., (ed.) The Oxford Francis Bacon, Volume XI, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
BenbasatI., and WeberR. (1996). Research Commentary: Rethinking ‘diversity’ in information systems research, Information Systems Research7(4): 389–399.
4.
BenbasatL, and ZmudR. (1999). Empirical Research in Information Systems: The practice of relevance, Management Information Systems Quarterly23(1): 3–16.
5.
DavisonR. M., and MartinsonsM.G. (2010). Inclusive or Exclusive? Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant IS Research, in 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (Lima, Peru), 12–15 August, [www document] http://aisel.aisnet.org/amds2010/111/.
6.
LeeA.S. (2010). Retrospect and Prospect: Information systems research in the last and next 25 years, Journal of Information Technology25(4): 336–348.
7.
MachiavelliN. (1532/2004). Il Principe – The Prince, UK: Penguin.
8.
RobeyD. (1996). Research Commentary: Diversity in IS research, Information Systems Research7(4): 400–408.
9.
RobeyD., and MarkusM. L. (1998). Beyond Rigour and Relevance: Producing consumable research about information systems, Information Resources Management Journal7(11): 7–15.
10.
TsuiA.S. (2006). Contextualisation in Chinese Management Research, Management and Organization Review2(1): 1–13.