Abstract
Introduction
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common problem in our aging population. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior and posterior approaches in the surgical treatment of CSM using validated outcome measures in a prospective cohort study.
Materials and Methods
Patients with defined clinical features of CSM were recruited from three hospitals in Singapore between October 2009 and December 2010. A total of 17 participants were recruited, and baseline demographic variables and outcome measure scores were established. Namely, the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Nurick, Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Participants underwent decompressive surgery by anterior or posterior approach, with choice of technique left to surgeon preference. Scores were retaken at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery for comparison against baseline, within and between groups through the follow-up period.
Results
Patients who underwent anterior approach surgery were younger, had fewer comorbidities, less extensive disease, better SF-36 physical functioning, and mJOA scores at baseline. Both groups had clinically significant improvement in scores based on validated minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Score improvement was more sustained in the anterior group, whereas in the posterior group improvement in scores was greatest at 6 months post-decompression, but declined thereafter (albeit to values still three times that at baseline). A patient who underwent posterior approach surgery developed anemia secondary to perioperative blood loss. There were no cases of implant-related complications or cases of revision surgery.
Conclusion
This study highlights the differences in patient and disease factors influencing choice of surgical approach and shows the safety and efficacy of CSM surgery regardless of approach.