Large-sized calvarial defects in pediatric patients pose a reconstructive challenge because of children's unique physiology, developing anatomy, and dynamic growth. We review the current literature and outcomes with autologous and alloplastic cranioplasty in the pediatric population.
GrantGAJolleyMEllenbogenRGRobertsTSGrussJRLoeserJDFailure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescentsJ Neurosurg2004100(2, Suppl Pediatrics): 163–168
2.
BowersCARiva-CambrinJHertzlerDAIIWalkerMLRisk factors and rates of bone flap resorption in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injuryJ Neurosurg Pediatr2013115526–532
3.
YadlaSCampbellPGChitaleRMaltenfortMGJabbourPSharanADEffect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic reviewNeurosurgery20116841124–1129, discussion 1130
4.
BaldoSTacconiLEffectiveness and safety of subcutaneous abdominal preservation of autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy: a prospective pilot studyWorld Neurosurg2010735552–556
5.
OppenheimerAJMesaJBuchmanSRCurrent and emerging basic science concepts in bone biology: implications in craniofacial surgeryJ Craniofac Surg201223130–36
6.
MatsunoATanakaHIwamuroH, et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplastyActa Neurochir (Wien)20061485535–540, discussion 540
7.
OsawaMHaraHIchinoseYKoyamaTKobayashiSSugitaYCranioplasty with a frozen and autoclaved bone flapActa Neurochir (Wien)19901021-238–41
8.
MorinaAKelmendiFMorinaQ, et al. Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall-Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country KosovaSurg Neurol Int2011272
9.
InamasuJKuramaeTNakatsukasaMDoes difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservationJ Trauma2010681183–187, discussion 187
10.
YapCMacarthurDCHopeDT'Mind the gap': resorption of a bone flap stored subcutaneously for 6 monthsBr J Neurosurg2002165523–524
11.
BhaskarIPInglisTJLeeGYClinical, radiological, and microbiological profile of patients with autogenous cranioplasty infectionsWorld Neurosurg201482(3–4)e531–e534
12.
HuangYHYangTMLeeTCChenWFYangKYAcute autologous bone flap infection after cranioplasty for postinjury decompressive craniectomyInjury201344144–47
13.
PiedraMPThompsonEMSeldenNRRagelBTGuillaumeDJOptimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in childrenJ Neurosurg Pediatr2012104268–272
14.
SchussPVatterHMarquardtG, et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complicationsJ Neurotrauma20122961090–1095
15.
SweenyLEbyBMagnusonJSCarrollWRRosenthalELReconstruction of scalp defects with the radial forearm free flapHead Neck Oncol2012421
16.
Jia-AoYHong-JingLZheng-HuaJKaiSZhen-HaiNReconstruction of a large pediatric scalp defect with skull exposure by a free anterolateral thigh flapPlast Reconstr Surg20121291178e–180e
17.
SerlettiJMSchingoVAJrDeuberMACarrasAJHerreraHRRealeVFFree tissue transfer in pediatric patientsAnn Plast Surg1996366561–568
18.
UusitaloMIbarraMFultonL, et al. Reconstruction with rectus abdominis myocutaneous free flap after orbital exenteration in childrenArch Ophthalmol2001119111705–1709
19.
OzkanOCoskunfiratOKOzgentasHEDerinARationale for reconstruction of large scalp defects using the anterolateral thigh flap: structural and aesthetic outcomesJ Reconstr Microsurg2005218539–545
20.
IidaTMiharaMYoshimatsuH, et al. Reconstruction of an extensive anterior skull base defect using a muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in a 1-year-old infantMicrosurgery2012328622–626
21.
YuJALinHJJinZHShiKNiuZHZhaoJCFree anterolateral thigh flap for coverage of scalp large defects in pediatric burn populationJ Burn Care Res2012334e180–e185
22.
RogersGFGreeneAKAutogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implicationsJ Craniofac Surg2012231323–327
23.
RogersGFGreeneAKMullikenJBProctorMRRidgwayEBExchange cranioplasty using autologous calvarial particulate bone graft effectively repairs large cranial defectsPlast Reconstr Surg201112741631–1642
24.
GreeneAKMullikenJBProctorMRRogersGFPediatric cranioplasty using particulate calvarial bone graftPlast Reconstr Surg20081222563–571
25.
ChaoMTJiangSSmithD, et al. Demineralized bone matrix and resorbable mesh bilaminate cranioplasty: a novel method for reconstruction of large-scale defects in the pediatric calvariaPlast Reconstr Surg20091233976–982
26.
BeedermanMAlkureishiLWLamSWarnkePReidRRExchange hybrid cranioplasty using particulate bone graft and demineralized bone matrix: the best of both worldsJ Craniofac Surg2014252451–454
27.
JaskolkaMSOlavarriaGReconstruction of skull defectsAtlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am2010182139–149
28.
AgrawalAGargLNSplit calvarial bone graft for the reconstruction of skull defectsJ Surg Tech Case Rep20113113–16
29.
InoueASatohSSekiguchiK, et al. Cranioplasty with split-thickness calvarial boneNeurol Med Chir (Tokyo)19953511804–807
30.
VerclerCJSuggKBBuchmanSRSplit cranial bone grafting in children younger than 3 years old: debunking a surgical mythPlast Reconstr Surg20141336822e–827e
31.
LeeJCKleiberGMPelletierATReidRRGottliebLJAutologous immediate cranioplasty with vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial defectsPlast Reconstr Surg20131324967–975
32.
SmithDMAfifiAMCooperGMMooneyMPMarraKGLoseeJEBMP-2-based repair of large-scale calvarial defects in an experimental model: regenerative surgery in cranioplastyJ Craniofac Surg20081951315–1322
33.
SmithDMCooperGMAfifiAM, et al. Regenerative surgery in cranioplasty revisited: the role of adipose-derived stem cells and BMP-2Plast Reconstr Surg201112851053–1060
34.
YonamineYMatsuyamaTSonomuraT, et al. Effectable application of vascular endothelial growth factor to critical sized rat calvaria defectsOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod20101092225–231
35.
ShahMMSmythMDWooASAdverse facial edema associated with off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in cranial reconstruction for craniosynostosis. Case reportJ Neurosurg Pediatr200813255–257
36.
VignesJRJeelaniNuDautheribesMSan-GalliFLiguoroDCranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect in a growing skull fracture in childrenJ Craniomaxillofac Surg2007353185–188
37.
LinAYKinsellaCRJrRottgersSA, et al. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomesJ Craniofac Surg201223167–70
38.
LeeSCWuCTLeeSTChenPJCranioplasty using polymethyl methacrylate prosthesesJ Clin Neurosci200916156–63
39.
MarchacDGreensmithALong-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgeryJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2008617744–752, discussion 753
40.
Moreira-GonzalezAJacksonITMiyawakiTBarakatKDiNickVClinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-upJ Craniofac Surg2003142144–153
41.
JaberiJGambrellKTiwanaPMaddenCFinnRLong-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defectsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2013712e81–e88
42.
GolzTGrahamCRBuschLCWulfJWinderRJTemperature elevation during simulated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty in a cadaver modelJ Clin Neurosci2010175617–622
43.
JosanVASgourosSWalshARDoverMSNishikawaHHockleyADCranioplasty in childrenChilds Nerv Syst2005213200–204
44.
BakerSBWeinzweigJKirschnerREBartlettSPApplications of a new carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement: early experience in pediatric and adult craniofacial reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg200210961789–1796
45.
StefiniREspositoGZanottiBIaccarinoCFontanellaMMServadeiFUse of “custom made” porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patientsSurg Neurol Int2013412
46.
KirschnerREKarmacharyaJOngG, et al. Repair of the immature craniofacial skeleton with a calcium phosphate cement: quantitative assessment of craniofacial growthAnn Plast Surg200249133–38, discussion 38
47.
SmarttJMJrKarmacharyaJGannonFH, et al. Repair of the immature and mature craniofacial skeleton with a carbonated calcium phosphate cement: assessment of biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and remodeling capacityPlast Reconstr Surg200511561642–1650
48.
LoseeJEKarmacharyaJGannonFH, et al. Reconstruction of the immature craniofacial skeleton with a carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement: interaction with bioresorbable meshJ Craniofac Surg2003141117–124
49.
SinghKABursteinFDWilliamsJKUse of hydroxyapatite cement in pediatric craniofacial reconstructive surgery: strategies for avoiding complicationsJ Craniofac Surg20102141130–1135
50.
WongRKGandolfiBMSt-HilaireHWiseMWMosesMComplications of hydroxyapatite bone cement in secondary pediatric craniofacial reconstructionJ Craniofac Surg2011221247–251
51.
GilardinoMSCabilingDSBartlettSPLong-term follow-up experience with carbonated calcium phosphate cement (Norian) for cranioplasty in children and adultsPlast Reconstr Surg20091233983–994
52.
WigginsAAusterberryRMorrisonDHoKMHoneybulSCranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates—14 years experienceNeurosurgery2013722248–256, discussion 256
53.
EufingerH, et al. Management of cranial and craniofacial bone defects with prefabricated individual titanium implants: follow-up and evaluation of 166 patients with 169 titanium implants from 1994–2000Int J CARS200614197–203
54.
CabrajaMKleinMLehmannTNLong-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defectsNeurosurg Focus2009266E10
55.
LethausBSafiYter Laak-PoortM, et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress modelJ Neurotrauma20122961077–1083
56.
MaasCSMerwinGEWilsonJFreyMDMavesMDComparison of biomaterials for facial bone augmentationArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg19901165551–556
57.
CarboniA, et al. Long-term follow-up of 105 porous polyethylene implants used to correct facial deformityEur J Plast Surg2002256310–314
58.
CesteroHJJrSalyerKETorantoIRBone growth into porous carbon, polyethylene, and polypropylene prosthesesJ Biomed Mater Res1975941–7
59.
TarkWHYoonISRahDKParkBYKimYOOsteoconductivity of porous polyethylene in human skullJ Craniofac Surg201223178–80
60.
WangJCWeiLXuJLiuJFGuiLClinical outcome of cranioplasty with high-density porous polyethyleneJ Craniofac Surg20122351404–1406
61.
GordonCRFisherMLiauwJ, et al. Multidisciplinary approach for improved outcomes in secondary cranial reconstruction: introducing the pericranial-onlay cranioplasty techniqueNeurosurgery20141002179–189, discussion 189–190
62.
OeiJDZhaoWWChuL, et al. Antimicrobial acrylic materials with in situ generated silver nanoparticlesJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater20121002409–415
63.
SpringerINAçilYKuchenbeckerS, et al. Bone graft versus BMP-7 in a critical size defect—cranioplasty in a growing infant modelBone2005374563–569
64.
ChengHJiangWPhillipsFM, et al. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)J Bone Joint Surg Am200385-A81544–1552
