Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

End plates serve as the interface between rigid vertebral bodies and pliant intervertebral disks. Because the lumbar spine carries significant forces and disks don't have a dedicated blood supply, end plates must balance conflicting requirements of being strong to prevent vertebral fracture and porous to facilitate transport between disk cells and vertebral capillaries. Consequently, end plates are particularly susceptible to damage, which can increase communication between proinflammatory disk constituents and vascularized vertebral bone marrow. Damaged end plate regions can be sites of reactive bone marrow lesions that include proliferating nerves, which are susceptible to chemical sensitization and mechanical stimulation. Although several lines of evidence indicate that innervated end plate damage can be a source of chronic low back pain, its role in patients is likely underappreciated because innervated damage is poorly visualized with diagnostic imaging. This literature review summarizes end plate biophysical function and aspects of pathologic degeneration that can lead to vertebrogenic pain. Areas of future research are identified in the context of unmet clinical needs for patients with chronic low back pain.

Keywords

end plate intervertebral disk spine low back pain

Chronic low back pain remains a difficult clinical problem, both to diagnose and to treat. Despite significant investments in basic and clinical research, the rates of disability and associated costs continue to escalate.¹ Although the prevailing view is that axial back pain arises from sensitized nociceptors within the annulus fibrosus of degenerating disks (annulogenic pain), there is growing evidence that the end plates are richly innervated and that innervated end plate damage may represent a common painful pathology (vertebrogenic pain).²,³ Properly identifying the pain generator is requisite for optimal treatment, so distinguishing between these forms of pain will likely be important for improving patient outcomes. The goal of this review is to summarize data regarding normal end plate anatomy, physiologic age-related end plate changes, and evidence for the role of pathologic changes as a source of chronic low back pain. In an effort to cover these topics within a clinical context, we have focused our summary on the end plates in the human spine. We refer the reader to the literature for a detailed comparison of end plate anatomy and biochemistry between humans and animals.⁴,⁵ Related, we acknowledge that it remains open for debate whether the end plate belongs to the vertebral body or to the intervertebral disk. Rather than presenting a specific viewpoint, we consider topics that are relevant to both its bony and cartilaginous components.⁶

Structure

The end plate is a bilayer of cartilage and bone that separates the intervertebral disks from the adjacent vertebrae (Fig. 1A to C). During prenatal development, the future vertebra starts as a cartilage anlagen that arises from chondrification centers of the sclerotomes during the sixth embryonic week (Fig. 2).⁷ The anlagen begins ossification at its centrum around invading blood vessels.⁸ This trabecular centrum is separated from the forming disk by an epiphyseal plate of columnar cartilage that progressively thins as the vertebra lengthens. Peripheral to the epiphyseal plate is a ring apophysis that doesn't participate in longitudinal growth, but is rather a traction apophysis by virtue of annular fiber insertion.⁹ Yet, the ends of the vertebrae are completely covered by the same end plate cartilage. By age 18, the epiphyseal cartilage has thinned and a subchondral bone plate has formed, thus creating the adult end plate bilayer. Simultaneously, the ring apophysis fuses to the vertebral body.

Fig. 1

(A) Gross morphology of the lumbar intervertebral joint. (B) Histology section showing regions of interest for panels C, D, and E. (C) End plate detail showing cartilaginous and bony components with hematopoietic marrow elements. (D) Insertion of annular fibers into the end plate cartilage at the inner annulus junction. (E) Vascular sinusoids in the marrow space adjacent to the end plate. Note for panels A and B, left side is anterior.

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of vertebral end plate development. (A) At embryonic week 6, the sclerotome begins to segment around the notochord to form periodic cartilaginous and fibrocartilaginous precursors to the vertebra and disks, respectively. (B) By embryonic week 15, the notochord atrophies within the vertebra, and ossification begins at the vertebral centers. (C) At embryonic week 25, the ossification centers expand as the vertebrae lengthen. Columnar cartilage develops at the vertebral ends to form the epiphyseal plates. (D) By age 5 years, the ossified portions of the vertebra extend to the lateral margins and the epiphyseal cartilage begins to thin. (E) By age 13 years, peripheral ossification centers outside the epiphyseal plate form the ring apophysis. (F) By age 18 years, the ring apophysis begins to fuse to the osseous mass of the vertebral body.

Like articular cartilage, the end plate cartilage consists of chondrocytes interspersed throughout an extracellular matrix of proteoglycans, collagen (types I and II), and water (Fig. 1C). However, the end plate cartilage differs from articular cartilage in its collagen fiber organization. Although healthy articular cartilage has zones of differing collagen orientation, end plate cartilage has collagen fibers aligned horizontally (parallel to the ends of the vertebrae).¹⁰ In the young disk, the end plate cartilage proteoglycan content is ~300 µg/mg, with water and type I collagen contents being 78% and 0.9 ng/mg, respectively.¹¹ The cartilage end plate is typically between 0.1 and 2.0 mm thick¹²,¹³; however, its thickness is known to vary with position and level, being thinner centrally and in the upper levels of the spine than peripherally and in the lower levels of the spine.¹³ The nature of the structural integration between the end plate and the surrounding tissues also varies with position. Peripherally, the collagen fibers in the lamellae of the annulus fibrosus are continuous with the collagen fibers in the end plate (Fig. 1D), whereas centrally, the integration between collagen fibers in the nucleus pulposus and the end plate is more convoluted.¹³,¹⁴ The collagen fibers of the cartilaginous and bony components of the end plate are completely separate.¹³

The bony component of the end plate has a structure not unlike that of the vertebral cortex and resembles a thickened, porous layer of fused trabecular bone with osteocytes entombed within saucer-shaped lamellar packets.¹⁵ Like the end plate cartilage, the bony end plate thickness varies depending on spinal level and location and is generally between 0.2 and 0.8 mm thick.¹⁶,¹⁷,¹⁸,¹⁹ At a given lumbar level, the bony end plates are thinner centrally than peripherally; also, the end plate cranial to a particular disk is thicker and has higher bone mineral density than does the end plate caudal to it.¹⁸,²⁰ In some individuals, a second, dense layer of bone exists below the superficial layer.¹⁶,¹⁹

The bone marrow compartment adjacent to the bony end plate consists of hematopoietic cells, fat cells, sinusoids (thin-walled capillaries), and nerves. The vertebral capillaries and nerves enter via the basivertebral foramen at the posterior vertebral cortex and small pores in the cortical shell, form an “arterial grid” at the vertebral centrum, then branch and terminate just adjacent to the cartilage end plates.²¹,²²,²³ These sinusoids and nerves provide a continuous bed across the bone–disk interface (Fig. 1E).²¹ Importantly for the disk, there is an intimate relationship between the effective perfusion of these sinusoids and marrow cellularity type. For example, perfusion decreases as thicker-walled capillaries replace the sinusoids, which can occur when the hematopoietic marrow converts to fat.²⁴,²⁵ The cause of this marrow conversion is unclear, but the increase in bone marrow adiposity may be related to declining bone mass,²⁶,27,²⁸,²⁹,³⁰ vascularity,²⁹,³¹ temperature,²⁵ or reduced bone loading.³²

End plate subchondral bone is innervated by basivertebral nerve, the fibers of which reach the bone marrow along with nutrient arteries that enter the vertebra through the posterior basivertebral foramen.²¹,³³,³⁴,³⁵ End plate innervation is comparable to that of the peripheral annulus,²,³,³⁶ and it is increased in areas of bone damage (Figs. 3 and 4).³⁷

Fig. 3

Distribution of protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5)-positive nerve fibers across the end plates (63-year-old woman, L5–S1). Compared with the density of nerves in normal end plate regions, nerve density is higher in end plate regions with damage. Nerve fibers in this disk were observed in the inferoposterior outer annulus. Note: left side is anterior.

Fig. 4

Midsagittal T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted (B) magnetic resonance (MR) images of an L1–L2 motion segment with poor end plate signal. (C) Corresponding ultrashort time-to-echo (UTE) MR image showing enhanced end plate signal. Arrows indicate end plate defects shown in Fig. 5A and 5B. (UTE imaging courtesy of Drs. Roland Krug and Misung Han, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.)

Biophysical Function

The structure of the end plate facilitates important biomechanical and nutritional functions. Biomechanically, the end plate is subjected to significant loads during activities of daily living as the trunk muscles contract to stabilize posture. Lumbar compression forces can be in the range of 800 N while standing upright to over 3,000 N during active lifting.³⁸ The nucleus becomes pressurized in response to these forces, the values of which have been measured to vary from 0.4 MPa while lying, to 1.5 MPa while standing and sitting, to 2.3 MPa while lifting.³⁹,⁴⁰,⁴¹ The end plate distributes these intradiscal pressures onto the adjacent vertebrae and prevents the pressurized disk nucleus from bulging into the underlying trabecular bone.⁴²,⁴³,⁴⁴

During spinal compression, the pressurized nucleus causes the end plate to be stretched, like a drumhead.⁴⁵ Consequently, the end plate is most prone to fail in tension. Ultimately, thickness, porosity, and curvature are important structural determinants of end plate biomechanical function: thick, dense end plates with a high degree of curvature are stronger than thin, porous, and flat end plates.¹⁸,⁴⁶,47,⁴⁸,⁴⁹

Nutritionally, the end plate is the primary pathway for transport between vertebral capillaries and cells within the disk nucleus.⁵⁰,⁵¹ Blood vessels and marrow spaces abut the cartilage layer (Fig. 1C, E) and provide channels for glucose and oxygen to enter the disk and for waste products to exit the disk. Permeability across the cartilage end plate correlates with the amount of direct contact between the end plate and vertebral marrow or vascular buds.⁵⁰ The typical marrow contact area (or effective exchange area) is between 10 and 40%,⁵²,⁵³,⁵⁴ with the central end plate (adjacent the nucleus) being more permeable than at the periphery.⁵⁰ The density of these vascular channels is higher adjacent to the disk nucleus than the annulus.¹³,⁵⁰,⁵⁵

Once nutrients reach the end plate, movement of small solutes (glucose, lactate, and oxygen) pass through disk matrix primarily by diffusion.⁵⁶,⁵⁷ Larger solutes may also be influenced by convective fluid flow created by mechanical disk compression and recovery. Diffusion into the disk is driven by the concentration gradient between the blood plasma and tissue matrix and represents a balance between supply (capillary density) and demand (disk cell density and metabolic rate).

Consequently, the end plate must balance conflicting biophysical demands. It must be strong to resist mechanical failure but must also be porous to facilitate chemical transport. Thin, porous end plates may favor disk health and thick, impermeable end plates favor vertebral integrity.¹⁸,⁵⁸ Recent data indicate that double-layer end plates may provide a more optimal balance between end plate strength and porosity,¹⁵ thereby protecting against damage while supporting improved transport to and from adjacent disks.

Physiologic Degeneration

During aging, the cartilage end plate experiences changes in proteoglycan and collagen, resulting in gradual thinning and calcification.¹¹,¹³,⁵⁹,⁶⁰ Proteoglycan content decreases from 300 µg/mg at age 2 to 150 µm/mg by age 80. Simultaneously, water and type I collagen decrease from 78 to 67% and from 0.9 ng/mg to 0.25 ng/mg, respectively.¹¹ Although the specific mechanisms responsible for the compositional deterioration are unclear, these age-related changes coincide with degeneration in the adjacent disk and are generally consistent with markers of chondrocyte hypertrophy (e.g., elevated expression of type X collagen).¹¹,⁶¹ Hence, it may be that factors such as diminished hydrostatic pressure play a role in end plate deterioration because hydrostatic pressure is a potent regulator of chondrocyte function.⁶²,⁶³

When the spine is compressed, the bony end plate is subjected to high tensile strains as it deforms into the underlying trabecular bone.⁴²,⁴³,⁴⁴,⁴⁵,⁶⁴ Several factors influence the susceptibility of the end plate to damage, including the nature of the mechanical loading, the local morphology of the end plate structure, the tissue material properties, and the condition of the intervertebral disk. End plates at the cranial vertebral aspect may be more susceptible to damage than caudal end plates because they are thinner and supported by less dense trabecular bone.¹⁸ Likewise, damage often occurs to the central end plate, the thinnest and weakest region.¹⁸,⁶⁵ Accumulation of end plate damage can cause focal weak points that progress to circumferential fissures.⁴⁴,⁶⁶,⁶⁷ This potential is exacerbated with age as the central region of the bony end plate becomes more porous (~60%) and consequently less stiff and weaker as the adjacent disks degenerate.¹²,¹⁹,⁶⁸,⁶⁹ These deleterious structural changes may be the result of adaptive remodeling to decreased disk proteoglycan content and pressure.⁷⁰,⁷¹ However, disk degeneration also diverts a greater proportion of the compressive load to the end plate periphery and vertebral rim,⁷²,⁷³ thereby reducing tensile and shear strains in the central end plate.⁴⁵,⁷⁴

End plate disruptions upset the uniformity of disk stress distributions.⁷⁵,⁷⁶ This, in turn, is thought to precipitate alterations in disk structure and matrix composition that typify disk degeneration because abnormal pressures can inhibit disk cell metabolism and accelerate matrix degradation.⁷⁷,⁷⁸,⁷⁹,⁸⁰ End plate disruption may also impede nutrient transport to the cells within the nucleus of the disk or incite inflammatory responses in the disk or vertebra.⁵⁰,⁸¹,⁸²,⁸³,⁸⁴

Pathologic Degeneration

A theoretical requirement for discogenic pain is pathologic innervation.⁸⁵,⁸⁶ In the normal disk, innervation is restricted to the outer layers of the annulus.⁸⁷ By contrast, vertebrae are well innervated: the periosteum is the most densely innervated bone component, but when the total tissue volume is considered, the bone marrow receives the greatest number of sensory fibers.³⁶,⁸⁸ This extensive network of nerves may modulate hemopoiesis and bone metabolism.⁸⁹ Marrow sensory and sympathetic fibers are frequently associated with blood vessels and consist of both fast myelinated fibers (group III or A-delta fibers with diameters ranging from 1 to 5 μm) that transmit sharp pain and slow unmyelinated fibers (group IV or C-fibers with diameters ranging from of 0.5 to 2 μm) that transmit dull or aching pain. Nearly all marrow pain fibers express calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and coexpress TrkA and p74 receptors that are sensitized by nerve growth factor (NGF).⁹⁰ These marrow fibers are the first to encounter and presumably become excited by pathologic processes occurring in the bone space. Consequently, patients can experience bone pain from elevated interosseous pressures even when the pathology is confined to the marrow,²³ and this pain can be ameliorated when bone innervation is ablated, such as after vertebroplasty.⁹¹

Provocation diskography (PD) is considered by many as the gold standard for diagnosing discogenic pain.⁹² The procedure consists of injecting a contrast agent into disks of a lightly sedated patient while monitoring the injected volume, pressure, contrast distribution pattern, and patient's pain response.⁹³ A positive test is based on pain intensity, concordance (similarity to pain before the procedure), degree of annular disruption, and presence of a negative adjacent control disk.⁹⁴ This test can reveal internal disk disruption and also identify which disks are painful and may be appropriate for treatment. Although not without controversy regarding its usefulness and safety,⁹⁵,⁹⁶,⁹⁷ PD results can be quite accurate (specificity of 0.94 and a false-positive rate of 6%) if performed using low-pressure technique.⁹³

The theoretical basis for PD-provoked pain is mechanical stimulation of chemically sensitized nociceptors.⁹⁸ Sensitized nociceptors within the outer annulus of the disk can be stretched by nucleus pressurization if the annulus is weakened by fissures. Nociceptors in the end plate may be similarly perturbed if the end plate is weakened by damage.⁹⁹ For example, the end plates can deflect comparably to the annulus during diskography (0.3 mm versus 0.5 mm, respectively, at 75 to 100 psi),⁹⁹,¹⁰⁰ and end plate deflection can increase in the presence of bone microdamage.¹⁰¹ In support of this concept are the observations that increased vertebral interosseous pressures: (1) occur during PD as pressures are transmitted to adjacent disks;¹⁰² (2) can cause pain;²³,¹⁰³ and (3) are elevated in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients.¹⁰⁴ Further, end plates removed from patients with chronic back pain show proliferation of blood vessels and CGRP-positive nerve fibers in the subchondral bone that predominates in areas of end plate damage and are sensitive to direct mechanical stimulation.³⁷,¹⁰⁵,¹⁰⁶

Perhaps the best evidence for the role of end plates in CLBP is the association between PD-confirmed discogenic pain and vertebral bone marrow abnormalities. Three types of vertebral bone marrow lesions (BML) noted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were first described by Modic et al in 1988.¹⁰⁷ Type I changes (fibrovascular replacement) show decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Histopathology of type I changes shows an active inflammatory stage that coincides with disruption and fissuring of the end plate and vascularized granulation tissue within the marrow. Type II changes show increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images and an iso- or slightly hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images. Type II changes correlate with fatty marrow replacement. Both types of Modic changes are dynamic in that type I changes can convert to type II or back to normal marrow, and similarly, type II can convert back to type I.¹⁰⁸,¹⁰⁹,¹¹⁰ Type III changes are represented by decreased signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images that correlate with dense woven bone (sclerosis).

Data from multiple independent studies suggest that Modic type I and II changes adjacent to the end plate are among the most specific of all MRI observations for predicting concordant PD-induced pain (Table 1). In one prospective study, moderate to severe Modic type I or II end plate abnormalities correlated 100% of the time with positive concordant pain at the adjacent disk.¹¹⁶ Recently, increased end plate innervation has also been reported for end plates with Modic changes.¹¹⁷,¹¹⁸ However, the presence of Modic changes are not very sensitive (15 to 65%) to PD-confirmed disk pain.¹¹¹,¹¹²,¹¹³,¹¹⁴,¹¹⁵ Poor sensitivity may reflect the categorical and subjective techniques used to classify BML,¹¹⁹ rather than ones that are quantitative and objective. It may also be that innervated end plate damage is not well visualized using standard MRI techniques, because the end plate has a short T2 that shows little signal with pulse sequences that have long echo times. Newer imaging sequences with ultrashort echo times may therefore help discriminate between patients with and without end plate pathologies (Fig. 4).

Table 1

Summary of incidence and diagnostic values of Modic changes for diskography-concordant CLBP

Study	Subjects	Age (y), range (mean)	Modic incidence, % (n)^a	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV (%)	NPV %
Braithwaite et al¹¹¹	58	21–63 (42)	10.7 (31/290)	23.3	96.8	91.3	46.5
Ito et al¹¹²	39	21–57 (37)	8.9 (9/101)	21.7	94.9	55.5	80.4
Kokkonen et al¹¹³	36	20–58 (40)	37.9 (39/103)	40.5	63.6	42.9	61.4
O'Neill et al¹¹⁴	143	21–71 (43)	8.0 (37/460)	13.8	98.2	89.2	51.3
Thompson et al¹¹⁵	736	22–78 (43)	12.3 (302/2,457)	25.5	94.8	72.5	70.1
Weishaupt et al¹¹⁶	50	28–50 (42)	22.4 (26/116)	47.9	95.6	88.5	72.2

Abbreviations: CLBP, chronic low back pain; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

Incidence refers to the number of levels studied.

The precise etiology of BML is not well understood, but it appears to involve autoimmune and inflammatory responses to chemicals produced by disk cells. Crock first proposed that vertebral BML result from inflammatory constituents that diffuse from the adjacent disks,¹²⁰ because disk tissue can trigger an autoimmune response due to secretion of proinflammatory and neurogenic factors such as interleukin-1, -6, and -8; tumor necrosis factor-α, prostaglandin E₂, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and NGF.¹²¹,¹²²,¹²³,¹²⁴,¹²⁵ These nucleus-derived chemicals can both sensitize existing nerves and promote new nerve growth.¹²⁶,^127,128 Additionally, end plate nerves can be irritated via accumulated by-products of disk cell anaerobic metabolism, such as lactic acid.¹²⁹

A predisposing factor for enhanced communication between the nucleus and vertebral marrow is end plate damage. For example, end plate damage has been qualitatively related to BML that contain pain fibers,¹⁰⁵,¹¹⁷ and more directly, end plate damage significantly increases diffusion between the vertebra and nucleus.⁸²,¹³⁰ Not surprisingly, therefore, various forms of end plate defects have been clinically associated with disk degeneration and axial back pain.¹³¹,¹³²,¹³³,¹³⁴ These include Schmorl nodes, fractures, avulsions/erosions, and calcifications (Fig. 5). Small end plate defects are difficult to observe radiographically,⁵⁸,¹⁰¹ and they are thought to be a common component of normal aging.¹³⁵ Schmorl nodes are large, focal end plate indentations that represent herniations of nucleus into adjacent vertebrae and are significantly associated with disk degeneration severity.¹³⁶ Because it can be challenging to distinguish between nodes that arise prior to skeletal maturity (e.g., at sites of cartilage defects that remain after notochord regression and growth plate closure) and nodes that form traumatically secondary to age-related subchondral weakening,¹³⁷,¹³⁸,¹³⁹,¹⁴⁰ the results from clinical studies relating Schmorl nodes to symptoms are mixed. For example, Schmorl nodes are relatively common in asymptomatic individuals.¹³⁶,¹⁴¹ However, in cases where the nodes associate with CLBP, MRI shows evidence of BML and fibrovascular bone marrow changes,¹⁴²,¹⁴³ which suggests a traumatic etiology. A recent cadaveric study relating different types of end plate defects to back pain history demonstrated a clear dose effect: larger lesions were associated with more severe degeneration and more frequent back pain (odds ratio = 17.88).¹⁴⁴

Fig. 5

Various end plate defects with hypothesized etiologies. (A) End plate cartilage avulsion resulting from bending motion that causes traction at the interface between the end plate and inner annulus. (B) Traumatic node with end plate fragment resulting from excessive compression with a healthy, gel-like nucleus pulposus. (C) Central end plate fracture with exposed trabeculae resulting from excessive compression with a degenerate, fibrous nucleus pulposus.

The finding that certain types of end plate defects predominate at distinct levels and locations in the spine suggests that end plate defects have unique etiologies (Fig. 6). Nodelike defects are more common in the central end plates of the upper lumbar and thoracolumbar spine,¹³¹ where trabecular bone density is lower,¹⁴⁵ end plates are less strong,¹⁴⁶ and subchondral softening is more severe.¹⁴⁵,¹⁴⁷ In contrast, avulsions/erosions and calcifications are more common at the vertebral rim in the lower lumbar spine,¹⁴⁸,¹⁴⁹,¹⁵⁰,¹⁵¹ where the greater range of motion in flexion and extension could lead to increased traction at the junction of the annulus and end plate cartilage.152 Calcification and sclerosis at the vertebral rim of the lower lumbar levels may be a consequence of repeated compressive trauma.

Fig. 6

Prevalence of end plate pathologies in different regions may arise from distinct biomechanical conditions. (A) In the lower lumbar spine, the prevalence of end plate cartilage avulsions and erosions increases caudally,¹⁴⁸,¹⁴⁹,¹⁵⁰ mirroring the increase in range of motion (combined flexion/extension data are shown).152 (B) In the upper lumbar spine, Schmorl nodes increase cranially,¹³¹ mirroring the decrease in trabecular bone mineral density¹⁴⁵ and end plate strength.¹⁴⁶

End Plates and Disk Regeneration

There is growing interest in developing novel technologies to repair or regenerate the degenerated intervertebral disk. These approaches consist of increasing the signals for cell matrix synthesis (gene or growth factor therapy) in attempts to reestablish nuclear swelling.¹⁵³ Because the disk is relatively acellular (typically 4,000 cells/mm³ in the nucleus),¹² it may also be critical to augment these approaches by introducing cells.

It is unclear whether end plate permeability and vascularity in degenerated disks is sufficient to support increases in cell density and metabolism (because poor nutrition may have led to the degeneration in the first place). These uncertainties may ultimately limit or prevent the successful extrapolation of disk repair technologies from small animals to man. Importantly, if it proves true that disk cell density and ultimately disk degeneration are tightly coupled to end plate permeability, then by definition, disk cellularity cannot be enhanced without commensurate increases in end plate permeability and vascularity (by yet undetermined methods). Similarly, efforts to increase synthesis rates of existing cells (by gene or growth factor therapy) may create excessive demands on a tenuous nutrition supply and thereby promote cell death.

Summary and Future Directions

End plates play a central role in maintaining disk and vertebral health. Their structure and composition reflect a balance between competing requirements for porosity and strength. As a result, end plates are particularly vulnerable to damage. End plate regions weakened by damage facilitate communication between the disk nucleus and vertebral marrow, which can cause an adverse combination of end plate nerve proliferation plus chemical sensitization and mechanical stimulation.

Unfortunately, current diagnostic tools do not depict subtle end plate damage that associates with neoinnervation, and consequently, the clinical significance of end plate damage may be underappreciated. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the role of end plates in accelerated disk degeneration and discogenic pain. Three areas are of particular importance. First, more data are needed to define the dependence of disk cell function on the quality of end plate vascularity and end plate permeability. This information will help establish individual risk factors that associate with disk degeneration severity. Second, disk/vertebra structural models with improved fidelity of end plate architecture and composition are needed to define mechanisms of increased end plate damage risk. This information may guide development of new diagnostic tools that stratify injury risk. Third, the biological basis for BML and end plate neoinnervation is unknown. Studies are needed to identify the chemical factors and cellular participants in the development of innervated, fibrovascular bone marrow. Ultimately, strong links between clinical observations in back pain patients and scientific studies on disk cells and tissues are a necessity given the lack of validated animal models of discogenic pain.

Funding Sources

National Institutes of Health Grant AR052811 Relievant Medsystems.

Disclosures

J. C. Lotz, Consultant, Research Support, Stock/Options: Relievant Medsystems, Nocimed LLC

A. J. Fields, None

E. C. Liebenberg, None

References

Freburger

J K

Holmes

G M

Agans

R P

, et al.

The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain

Arch Intern Med 2009 169 251–258

Fagan

Moore

Vernon Roberts

Blumbergs

Fraser

ISSLS prize winner: The innervation of the intervertebral disc: a quantitative analysis

Spine 2003 28 2570–2576

van Dieën

J H

Weinans

Toussaint

H M

Fractures of the lumbar vertebral endplate in the etiology of low back pain: a hypothesis on the causative role of spinal compression in aspecific low back pain

Med Hypotheses 1999 53 246–252

Roberts

Menage

Duance

Wotton

Ayad

1991 Volvo Award in basic sciences. Collagen types around the cells of the intervertebral disc and cartilage end plate: an immunolocalization study

Spine 1991 16 1030–1038

Lotz

J C

Animal models of intervertebral disc degeneration: lessons learned

Spine 2004 29 2742–2750

Moore

R J

The vertebral end-plate: what do we know?

Eur Spine J 2000 9 92–96

Dias

M S

Normal and abnormal development of the spine

Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007 18 415–429

Bick

E M

Copel

J W

Longitudinal growth of the human vertebra; a contribution to human osteogeny

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1950 32 (A:04) 803–814

Bick

E M

Copel

J W

The ring apophysis of the human vertebra; contribution to human osteogeny. II

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1951 33-A 783–787

10.

Aspden

R M

Hickey

D S

Hukins

D W

Determination of collagen fibril orientation in the cartilage of vertebral end plate

Connect Tissue Res 1981 9 83–87

11.

Antoniou

Goudsouzian

N M

Heathfield

T F

, et al.

The human lumbar endplate. Evidence of changes in biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, aging, and degeneration

Spine 1996 21 1153–1161

12.

Rodriguez

A G

Slichter

C K

Acosta

F L

, et al.

Human disc nucleus properties and vertebral endplate permeability

Spine 2011 36 512–520

13.

Roberts

Menage

Urban

J P

Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc

Spine 1989 14 166–174

14.

Wade

K R

Robertson

P A

Broom

N D

A fresh look at the nucleus-endplate region: new evidence for significant structural integration

Eur Spine J 2011 20 1225–1232

15.

Fields

A J

Sahli

Rodriguez

A G

Lotz

J C

Seeing double: a comparison of microstructure, biomechanical function, and adjacent disc health between double- and single-layer vertebral endplates

Spine 2012 37 E1310–E1317

16.

Edwards

W T

Zheng

Ferrara

L A

Yuan

H A

Structural features and thickness of the vertebral cortex in the thoracolumbar spine

Spine 2001 26 218–225

17.

Silva

M J

Wang

Keaveny

T M

Hayes

W C

Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate

Bone 1994 15 409–414

18.

Zhao

F D

Pollintine

Hole

B D

Adams

M A

Dolan

Vertebral fractures usually affect the cranial endplate because it is thinner and supported by less-dense trabecular bone

Bone 2009 44 372–379

19.

Rodriguez

A G

Rodriguez-Soto

A E

Burghardt

A J

, et al.

Morphology of the human vertebral endplate

J Orthop Res 2012 30 280–287

20.

Wang

Battié

M C

Boyd

S K

Videman

The osseous endplates in lumbar vertebrae: thickness, bone mineral density and their associations with age and disk degeneration

Bone 2011 48 804–809

21.

Bailey

J F

Liebenberg

Degmetich

Lotz

J C

Innervation patterns of PGP 9.5-positive nerve fibers within the human lumbar vertebra

J Anat 2011 218 263–270

22.

Crock

H V

Yoshizawa

The blood supply of the lumbar vertebral column

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976 115 6–21

23.

Laroche

Intraosseous circulation from physiology to disease

Joint Bone Spine 2002 69 262–269

24.

Montazel

J L

Divine

Lepage

Kobeiter

Breil

Rahmouni

Normal spinal bone marrow in adults: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging

Radiology 2003 229 703–709

25.

Kricun

M E

Red-yellow marrow conversion: its effect on the location of some solitary bone lesions

Skeletal Radiol 1985 14 10–19

26.

Meunier

Aaron

Edouard

Vignon

Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1971 80 147–154

27.

Crock

H V

Goldwasser

Yoshizawa

Vascular anatomy related to the intervertebral disc

In:

The Biology of the Intervertebral Disc

Boca Raton, FL

CRC Press

1988

28.

Lips

van Ginkel

F C

Netelenbos

J C

Bone marrow and bone remodeling

Bone 1985 6 343–344

29.

Schnitzler

C M

Mesquita

Bone marrow composition and bone microarchitecture and turnover in blacks and whites

J Bone Miner Res 1998 13 1300–1307

30.

Burkhardt

Kettner

Böhm

, et al.

Changes in trabecular bone, hematopoiesis and bone marrow vessels in aplastic anemia, primary osteoporosis, and old age: a comparative histomorphometric study

Bone 1987 8 157–164

31.

Tornvig

Mosekilde

L I

Justesen

Falk

Kassem

Troglitazone treatment increases bone marrow adipose tissue volume but does not affect trabecular bone volume in mice

Calcif Tissue Int 2001 69 46–50

32.

Trudel

Payne

Mädler

, et al.

Bone marrow fat accumulation after 60 days of bed rest persisted 1 year after activities were resumed along with hemopoietic stimulation: the Women International Space Simulation for Exploration study

J Appl Physiol 2009 107 540–548

33.

Sherman

M S

The nerves of bone

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963 45 522–528

34.

Antonacci

M D

Mody

D R

Heggeness

M H

Innervation of the human vertebral body: a histologic study

J Spinal Disord 1998 11 526–531

35.

Bogduk

Tynan

Wilson

A S

The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs

J Anat 1981 132 Pt 1 39–56

36.

Mach

D B

Rogers

S D

Sabino

M C

, et al.

Origins of skeletal pain: sensory and sympathetic innervation of the mouse femur

Neuroscience 2002 113 155–166

37.

Antonacci

M D

Mody

D R

Rutz

Weilbaecher

Heggeness

M H

A histologic study of fractured human vertebral bodies

J Spinal Disord Tech 2002 15 118–126

38.

Arjmand

Plamondon

Shirazi-Adl

Parnianpour

Larivière

Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012 27 537–544

39.

Quinnell

R C

Stockdale

H R

Willis

D S

Observations of pressures within normal discs in the lumbar spine

Spine 1983 8 166–169

40.

Wilke

H J

Neef

Caimi

Hoogland

Claes

L E

New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life

Spine 1999 24 755–762

41.

Sato

Kikuchi

Yonezawa

In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems

Spine 1999 24 2468–2474

42.

Brinckmann

Frobin

Hierholzer

Horst

Deformation of the vertebral end-plate under axial loading of the spine

Spine 1983 8 851–856

43.

Rolander

S D

Blair

W E

Deformation and fracture of the lumbar vertebral end plate

Orthop Clin North Am 1975 6 75–81

44.

Yoganandan

Maiman

D J

Pintar

, et al.

Microtrauma in the lumbar spine: a cause of low back pain

Neurosurgery 1988 23 162–168

45.

Fields

A J

Lee

G L

Keaveny

T M

Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body

J Biomech 2010 43 3126–3131

46.

Hulme

P A

Boyd

S K

Ferguson

S J

Regional variation in vertebral bone morphology and its contribution to vertebral fracture strength

Bone 2007 41 946–957

47.

Fields

A J

, et al.

Effects of endplate microstructure on biomechanical integrity

Presented at: New Horizons in Intervertebral Disc Research.

Philadelphia, PA

2011

48.

Langrana

N A

Kale

S P

Edwards

W T

Lee

C K

Kopacz

K J

Measurement and analyses of the effects of adjacent end plate curvatures on vertebral stresses

Spine J 2006 6 267–278

49.

Nekkanty

Yerramshetty

Kim

D G

, et al.

Stiffness of the endplate boundary layer and endplate surface topography are associated with brittleness of human whole vertebral bodies

Bone 2010 47 783–789

50.

Nachemson

Lewin

Maroudas

Freeman

M A

In vitro diffusion of dye through the end-plates and the annulus fibrosus of human lumbar inter-vertebral discs

Acta Orthop Scand 1970 41 589–607

51.

Urban

J P

Holm

Maroudas

Nachemson

Nutrition of the intervertebral disk. An in vivo study of solute transport

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977 129 101–114

52.

Roberts

Menage

Urban

J PG

Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc

Spine 1989 14 166–174

53.

Holm

Maroudas

Urban

J P

Selstam

Nachemson

Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism

Connect Tissue Res 1981 8 101–119

54.

Maroudas

Stockwell

R A

Nachemson

Urban

Factors involved in the nutrition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc: cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro

J Anat 1975 120 Pt 1 113–130

55.

Roberts

Urban

J P

Evans

Eisenstein

S M

Transport properties of the human cartilage endplate in relation to its composition and calcification

Spine 1996 21 415–420

56.

Urban

M R

Fairbank

J C

Etherington

P J

Loh FRCA

Winlove

C P

Urban

J P

Electrochemical measurement of transport into scoliotic intervertebral discs in vivo using nitrous oxide as a tracer

Spine 2001 26 984–990

57.

Bartels

E M

Fairbank

J C

Winlove

C P

Urban

J P

Oxygen and lactate concentrations measured in vivo in the intervertebral discs of patients with scoliosis and back pain

Spine 1998 23 1–7, discussion 8

58.

Benneker

L M

Heini

P F

Alini

Anderson

S E

Ito

2004 Young Investigator Award Winner: vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions and intervertebral disc degeneration

Spine 2005 30 167–173

59.

Bernick

Cailliet

Vertebral end-plate changes with aging of human vertebrae

Spine 1982 7 97–102

60.

Bishop

P B

Pearce

R H

The proteoglycans of the cartilaginous end-plate of the human intervertebral disc change after maturity

J Orthop Res 1993 11 324–331

61.

Aigner

Gresk-otter

K R

Fairbank

J C

von der Mark

Urban

J P

Variation with age in the pattern of type X collagen expression in normal and scoliotic human intervertebral discs

Calcif Tissue Int 1998 63 263–268

62.

Adams

M A

McNally

D S

Dolan

“Stress” distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration

J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996 78 965–972

63.

Wong

Siegrist

Goodwin

Cyclic tensile strain and cyclic hydrostatic pressure differentially regulate expression of hypertrophic markers in primary chondrocytes

Bone 2003 33 685–693

64.

Hulme

P A

Ferguson

S J

Boyd

S K

Determination of vertebral endplate deformation under load using micro-computed tomography

J Biomech 2008 41 78–85

65.

Grant

J P

Oxland

T R

Dvorak

M F

Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates

Spine 2001 26 889–896

66.

Smith

F P

Experimental biomechanics of intervertebral disc rupture through a vertebral body

J Neurosurg 1969 30 134–139

67.

Vernon-Roberts

Pirie

C J

Healing trabecular microfractures in the bodies of lumbar vertebrae

Ann Rheum Dis 1973 32 406–412

68.

Grant

J P

Oxland

T R

Dvorak

M F

Fisher

C G

The effects of bone density and disc degeneration on the structural property distributions in the lower lumbar vertebral endplates

J Orthop Res 2002 20 1115–1120

69.

Keller

T S

Ziv

Moeljanto

Spengler

D M

Interdependence of lumbar disc and subdiscal bone properties: a report of the normal and degenerated spine

J Spinal Disord 1993 6 106–113

70.

Aoki

Yamamoto

Kitamura

, et al.

End plate of the discovertebral joint: degenerative change in the elderly adult

Radiology 1987 164 411–414

71.

Simpson

E K

Parkinson

I H

Manthey

Fazzalari

N L

Intervertebral disc disorganization is related to trabecular bone architecture in the lumbar spine

J Bone Miner Res 2001 16 681–687

72.

Homminga

Weinans

Gowin

Felsenberg

Huiskes

Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution

Spine 2001 26 1555–1561

73.

Kurowski

Kubo

The relationship of degeneration of the intervertebral disc to mechanical loading conditions on lumbar vertebrae

Spine 1986 11 726–731

74.

Shirazi-Adl

S A

Shrivastava

S C

Ahmed

A M

Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study

Spine 1984 9 120–134

75.

Adams

M A

Freeman

B J

Morrison

H P

Nelson

I W

Dolan

Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration

Spine 2000 25 1625–1636

76.

Adams

M A

McNally

D S

Wagstaff

Goodship

A E

Abnormal stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs following damage to the vertebral bodies: a cause of disc failure?

Eur Spine J 1993 1 214–221

77.

Handa

Ishihara

Ohshima

Osada

Tsuji

Obata

Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc

Spine 1997 22 1085–1091

78.

Ishihara

McNally

D S

Urban

J P

Hall

A C

Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk

J Appl Physiol 1996 80 839–846

79.

Lotz

J C

Chin

J R

Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading

Spine 2000 25 1477–1483

80.

Walsh

A J

Lotz

J C

Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading

J Biomech 2004 37 329–337

81.

Maroudas

Stockwell

R A

Nachemson

Urban

Factors involved in the nutrition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc: cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro

J Anat 1975 120 Pt 1 113–130

82.

Rajasekaran

Babu

J N

Arun

Armstrong

B R

Shetty

A P

Murugan

ISSLS prize winner: a study of diffusion in human lumbar discs: a serial magnetic resonance imaging study documenting the influence of the endplate on diffusion in normal and degenerate discs

Spine 2004 29 2654–2667

83.

Bisla

R S

Marchisello

P J

Lockshin

M D

Hart

D M

Marcus

R E

Granda

Auto-immunological basis of disk degeneration

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976 121 205–211

84.

Crock

H V

Internal disc disruption. A challenge to disc prolapse fifty years on

Spine 1986 11 650–653

85.

Coppes

M H

Marani

Thomeer

R T

Groen

G J

Innervation of “painful” lumbar discs

Spine 1997 22 2342–2349, discussion 2349–2350

86.

Peng

Hao

Hou

, et al.

Possible pathogenesis of painful intervertebral disc degeneration

Spine 2006 31 560–566

87.

Jackson

H C

Winkelmann

R K

Bickel

W H

Nerve endings in the human lumbar spinal column and related structures

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966 48 1272–1281

88.

Serre

C M

Farlay

Delmas

P D

Chenu

Evidence for a dense and intimate innervation of the bone tissue, including glutamate-containing fibers

Bone 1999 25 623–629

89.

Artico

Bosco

Cavallotti

, et al.

Noradrenergic and cholinergic innervation of the bone marrow

Int J Mol Med 2002 10 77–80

90.

Halvorson

K G

Kubota

Sevcik

M A

, et al.

A blocking antibody to nerve growth factor attenuates skeletal pain induced by prostate tumor cells growing in bone

Cancer Res 2005 65 9426–9435

91.

Niv

Gofeld

Devor

Causes of pain in degenerative bone and joint disease: a lesson from vertebroplasty

Pain 2003 105 387–392

92.

Fraser

R D

The North American Spine Society (NASS) on lumbar discography

Spine 1996 21 1274–1276

93.

Wolfer

L R

Derby

Lee

J E

Lee

S H

Systematic review of lumbar provocation discography in asymptomatic subjects with a meta-analysis of false-positive rates

Pain Physician 2008 11 513–538

94.

Walsh

T R

Weinstein

J N

Spratt

K F

Lehmann

T R

Aprill

Sayre

Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990 72 1081–1088

95.

Carragee

E J

Don

A S

Hurwitz

E L

Cuellar

J M

Carrino

J A

Herzog

2009 ISSLS Prize Winner: Does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study

Spine 2009 34 2338–2345

96.

Carragee

E J

Alamin

T F

Discography. A review

Spine J 2001 1 364–372

97.

Carragee

E J

Lincoln

Parmar

V S

Alamin

A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography

Spine 2006 31 2115–2123

98.

Weinstein

Claverie

Gibson

The pain of discography

Spine 1988 13 1344–1348

99.

Peng

Chen

Kuang

Pang

Zhang

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of back pain originating from endplate

Eur Spine J 2009 18 1035–1040

100.

Heggeness

M H

Doherty

B J

Discography causes end plate deflection

Spine 1993 18 1050–1053

101.

Yoganandan

Larson

S J

Pintar

F A

Gallagher

Reinartz

Droese

Intravertebral pressure changes caused by spinal microtrauma

Neurosurgery 1994 35 415–421, discussion 421

102.

Hebelka

Gaulitz

Nilsson

Holm

Hansson

The transfer of disc pressure to adjacent discs in discography: a specificity problem?

Spine 2010 35 E1025–E1029

103.

Esses

S I

Moro

J K

Intraosseous vertebral body pressures

Spine 1992 17 6, Suppl S155–S159

104.

Arnoldi

C C

Intraosseous hypertension. A possible cause of low back pain?

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976 115 30–34

105.

Brown

M F

Hukkanen

M V

McCarthy

I D

, et al.

Sensory and sympathetic innervation of the vertebral endplate in patients with degenerative disc disease

J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997 79 147–153

106.

Kuslich

S D

Ulstrom

C L

Michael

C J

The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia

Orthop Clin North Am 1991 22 181–187

107.

Modic

M T

Steinberg

P M

Ross

J S

Masaryk

T J

Carter

J R

Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging

Radiology 1988 166 1 Pt 1 193–199

108.

Kuisma

Karppinen

Niinimäki

, et al.

A three-year follow-up of lumbar spine endplate (Modic) changes

Spine 2006 31 1714–1718

109.

Vital

J M

Gille

Pointillart

, et al.

Course of Modic 1 six months after lumbar posterior osteosynthesis

Spine 2003 28 715–720, discussion 721

110.

Marshman

L A

Trewhella

Friesem

Bhatia

C K

Krishna

Reverse transformation of Modic type 2 changes to Modic type 1 changes during sustained chronic low-back pain severity. Report of two cases and review of the literature

J Neurosurg Spine 2007 6 152–155

111.

Braithwaite

White

Saifuddin

Renton

Taylor

B A

Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography

Eur Spine J 1998 7 363–368

112.

Ito

Incorvaia

K M

S F

Fredrickson

B E

Yuan

H A

Rosenbaum

A E

Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation

Spine 1998 23 1252–1258, discussion 1259–1260

113.

Kokkonen

S M

Kurunlahti

Tervonen

, et al.

Endplate degeneration observed on magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: correlation with pain provocation and disc changes observed on computed tomography diskography

Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 27 2274–2278

114.

O'Neill

Kurgansky

Kaiser

, et al.

Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain

Pain Physician 2008 11 311–326

115.

Thompson

K J

Dagher

A P

Eckel

T S

Clark

Reinig

J W

Modic changes on MR images as studied with provocative diskography: clinical relevance—a retrospective study of 2457 disks

Radiology 2009 250 849–855

116.

Weishaupt

Zanetti

Hodler

, et al.

Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging

Radiology 2001 218 420–427

117.

Ohtori

Inoue

Ito

, et al.

Tumor necrosis factor-immunoreactive cells and PGP 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibers in vertebral endplates of patients with discogenic low back Pain and Modic Type 1 or Type 2 changes on MRI

Spine 2006 31 1026–1031

118.

Yamauchi

Ohtori

Inoue

, et al.

Tumor necrosis factor-immunoreactive cells and PGP 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibers in vertebral endplate of patients with vertebral endplates of patients with discogenic low back pain and Modic Type 1 or Type 2 changes on MRI

Presented at: 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine; Bergen, Norway; 2006

119.

Rahme

Moussa

The modic vertebral endplate and marrow changes: pathologic significance and relation to low back pain and segmental instability of the lumbar spine

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008 29 838–842

120.

Crock

H V

Internal disc disruption. A challenge to disc prolapse fifty years on

Spine 1986 11 650–653

121.

X L

J X

Wang

Tian

Han

Possible role of autoimmune reaction in Modic Type I changes

Med Hypotheses 2011 76 692–694

122.

Miyamoto

Saura

Harada

Doita

Mizuno

The role of cyclooxygenase-2 and inflammatory cytokines in pain induction of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc

Kobe J Med Sci 2000 46 13–28

123.

Ahn

S H

Cho

Y W

Ahn

M W

Jang

S H

Sohn

Y K

Kim

H S

mRNA expression of cytokines and chemokines in herniated lumbar intervertebral discs

Spine 2002 27 911–917

124.

Olmarker

Larsson

Tumor necrosis factor alpha and nucleus-pulposus-induced nerve root injury

Spine 1998 23 2538–2544

125.

Weiler

Nerlich

A G

Bachmeier

B E

Boos

Expression and distribution of tumor necrosis factor alpha in human lumbar intervertebral discs: a study in surgical specimen and autopsy controls

Spine 2005 30 44–53, discussion 54

126.

García-Cosamalón

del Valle

M E

Calavia

M G

, et al.

Intervertebral disc, sensory nerves and neurotrophins: who is who in discogenic pain?

J Anat 2010 217 1–15

127.

Olmarker

Blomquist

Strömberg

Nannmark

Thomsen

Rydevik

Inflammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus

Spine 1995 20 665–669

128.

Cavanaugh

J M

Neural mechanism of idiopathic low back pain

In:

Weinstein

J N

Gordon

, eds.

Low Back Pain: A Scientific and Clinical Overview

Rosemont, IL

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

1996

129.

Keshari

K R

Lotz

J C

Link

T M

Majumdar

Kurhanewicz

Lactic acid and proteoglycans as metabolic markers for discogenic back pain

Spine 2008 33 312–317

130.

Niinimäki

Korkiakoski

Parviainen

, et al.

Association of lumbar artery narrowing, degenerative changes in disc and endplate and apparent diffusion in disc on postcontrast enhancement of lumbar intervertebral disc

MAGMA 2009 22 101–109

131.

Pfirrmann

C W

Resnick

Schmorl nodes of the thoracic and lumbar spine: radiographic-pathologic study of prevalence, characterization, and correlation with degenerative changes of 1,650 spinal levels in 100 cadavers

Radiology 2001 219 368–374

132.

Katz

M E

Teitelbaum

S L

Gilula

L A

Resnick

Katz

S J

Radiologic and pathologic patterns of end-plate-based vertebral sclerosis

Invest Radiol 1988 23 447–454

133.

Stäbler

Bellan

Weiss

Gärtner

Brossmann

Reiser

M F

MR imaging of enhancing intraosseous disk herniation (Schmorl's nodes)

AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 168 933–938

134.

Cheung

K M

Samartzis

Karppinen

Luk

K D

Are “patterns” of lumbar disc degeneration associated with low back pain?: new insights based on skipped level disc pathology

Spine 2012 37 E430–E438

135.

Coventry

M B

Ghormley

R K

Kernohan

J W

The intervertebral disc: its microscopic anatomy and pathology

J Bone Joint Surg Br 1945 27 460–474

136.

Mok

F P

Samartzis

Karppinen

Luk

K D

Fong

D Y

Cheung

K M

ISSLS prize winner: prevalence, determinants, and association of Schmorl nodes of the lumbar spine with disc degeneration: a population-based study of 2449 individuals

Spine 2010 35 1944–1952

137.

Hassler

The human intervertebral disc. A micro-angiographical study on its vascular supply at various ages

Acta Orthop Scand 1969 40 765–772

138.

Hirsch

Schajowicz

Studies on structural changes in the lumbar annulus fibrosus

Acta Orthop Scand 1952 22 184–231

139.

Hilton

R C

Ball

Benn

R T

Vertebral end-plate lesions (Schmorl's nodes) in the dorsolumbar spine

Ann Rheum Dis 1976 35 127–132

140.

Wagner

A L

Murtagh

F R

Arrington

J A

Stallworth

Relationship of Schmorl's nodes to vertebral body endplate fractures and acute endplate disk extrusions

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000 21 276–281

141.

Wang

Videman

Battié

M C

Lumbar vertebral endplate lesions: prevalence, classification, and association with age

Spine 2012 37 1432–1439

142.

Takahashi

Miyazaki

Ohnari

Takino

Tomita

Schmorl's nodes and low-back pain. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals

Eur Spine J 1995 4 56–59

143.

Peng

Hou

Shang

Wang

Yang

The pathogenesis of Schmorl's nodes

J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003 85 879–882

144.

Wang

Videman

Battié

M C

ISSLS prize winner: Lumbar vertebral endplate lesions: associations with disc degeneration and back pain history

Spine 2012 37 1490–1496

145.

Singer

Edmondston

Day

Breidahl

Price

Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region

Bone 1995 17 167–174

146.

Hou

Luo

A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level

Spine 2009 34 E427–E433

147.

Hansson

Roos

The relation between bone mineral content, experimental compression fractures, and disc degeneration in lumbar vertebrae

Spine 1981 6 147–153

148.

Wang

Battié

M C

Videman

A morphological study of lumbar vertebral endplates: radiographic, visual and digital measurements

Eur Spine J 2012 21 2316–2323

149.

Hilton

R C

Ball

Vertebral rim lesions in the dorsolumbar spine

Ann Rheum Dis 1984 43 302–307

150.

Vernon-Roberts

Pirie

C J

Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae

Rheumatol Rehabil 1977 16 13–21

151.

Grignon

Mainard

, et al.

The structure of the cartilaginous end-plates in elder people

Surg Radiol Anat 2000 22 13–19

152.

White

A A

Panjabi

M M

Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed

Philadelphia, PA

J.B. Lippincott Co

1990

153.

Lotz

J C

Haughton

Boden

S D

, et al.

New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks

Radiology 2012 264 6–19

The Role of the Vertebral End Plate in Low Back Pain

Abstract

Keywords

Structure

Biophysical Function

Physiologic Degeneration

Pathologic Degeneration

End Plates and Disk Regeneration

Summary and Future Directions

Funding Sources National Institutes of Health Grant AR052811 Relievant Medsystems. Disclosures J. C. Lotz, Consultant, Research Support, Stock/Options: Relievant Medsystems, Nocimed LLC A. J. Fields, None E. C. Liebenberg, None

Funding Sources

Disclosures

References

Funding Sources

National Institutes of Health Grant AR052811 Relievant Medsystems.

Disclosures

J. C. Lotz, Consultant, Research Support, Stock/Options: Relievant Medsystems, Nocimed LLC

A. J. Fields, None

E. C. Liebenberg, None