Abstract
Study Design
Comparison outcome treatment of pain syndromes in lumbar degenerative disk disease (DDD) in application two combined minimally invasive methods of treatment in intervertebral disk (IVD) herniations.
Objectives
To estimate and compare the treatment effectiveness of laser IVD vaporization in combination with dynamic stabilization by percutaneous interspinous implant In-Space.
Materials and Methods
There were selected patients who were operated (71 females and 55 males) at the age of 28 to 46 with protrusions of IVD and presence of signs of spondyloarthrosis. There were two groups of patients: the first group consisted of 109 patients and underwent laser vaporization of IVD by laser Nd-YAG Dornier; the second group consisted of 17 patients with laser vaporization in combination with percutaneous interspinous stabilization by In-Space (Synthes) implant.
In the first group, pathology located on the levels L3-L4 (18 cases), L4-L5 (52 cases) and L5-S1 (39 cases), in the second group on the levels L3-L4 (3 cases), L4-L5 (10 cases), and L5-S1 (4 cases). Relatively less quantity of patients with the level L5-S1 in the second group is caused by selection and limited opportunities of interspinous fixation on this level owing to anatomical peculiarity. Laser vaporization operation of IVD was performed under local anesthesia in the standard regime and takes 25 minutes in the average. The second stage in the second group to the interspinous space from lateral puncture was inserted interspinal stabilizer with 15 minutes duration under local or intravenous anesthesia. All manipulations were performed under X-ray control.
Results
As a result of treatment, it is managed to gain significant improvement quality of patients life estimated by ODI (23%, from 9.5 to 31%) in discharge for all patients. The results of treatment showed the outcomes as follows: in first group outcomes according to Mac Nab scale areexcellent 59 (54.1%) patients, good 42 (38.5%), satisfactory 8 (7.37%). According to Nurick scale, excellent 61 (64.3%) patients, improvement 19 (17.4%), without dynamic 17 (15.6%), worsening 3 (2.7%). Three patients in the postoperative follow-up had herniation recurrence. In the second group, outcomes according to Mac Nab are as follows: excellent 14 (82.3%), good 3 (17.7%). According to Nurick, excellent 12 (70.5%), improvement 5 (29.5%).
Conclusion
Performing percutaneous dynamic interspinous stabilization after laser vaporization of IVD is an effective method of treatment of pain syndrome in comparison with isolated application of laser vaporization.
Yes
None declared
