Maxillofacial trauma caused by firearms has considerably increased, in which the mandibular body is the site of highest incidence of firearm projectiles. In these cases, the use of titanium plates and screws allows the early restoration of form and function of the mandible with stable and predictable results. Recently, conventional plates have been extensively used to treat comminuted mandibular fractures. Nevertheless, the conventional system presents several limitations such as screw compression against the bone interface and the necessity of precise fit of plate to the bone. To overcome such drawbacks, the locking plates have emerged. The present clinical case reported the operative treatment of mandibular fracture caused by firearm projectiles with the use of locking plate. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of this system are presented.
AlperMTotanSCankayaliRSongürEGunshot wounds of the face in attempted suicide patientsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg1998568930–933, discussion 933–934
2.
XavierLRMacedoEBPadilhaWWN, et al. Incidência e tratamento inicial das fraturas mandibulares por arma de fogo na cidade do Rio de JaneiroRev Fac Odontol Bauru2000831–35
3.
PereiraCCSJacobRJTakahashiAShinoharaEHFratura mandibular por projétil de arma de fogoRev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac2006639–46
4.
Andrade FilhoEFFadul JuniorRAzevedoRAA, et al. Mandibular fractures: analysis of 166 casesRev Assoc Med Bras2000463272–276
5.
SilvaJJMachadoRANascimentoMM, et al. Lesão por arma de fogo em terço inferior de face de criança: relato de casoRev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac20044163–168
6.
DemetriadesDChahwanSGomezH, et al. Initial evaluation and management of gunshot wounds to the faceJ Trauma19984539–41
7.
CunninghamLLHaugRHFordJFirearm injuries to the maxillofacial region: an overview of current thoughts regarding demographics, pathophysiology, and managementJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2003618932–942
8.
EllisEIIIGrahamJUse of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgeryJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2002606642–645, discussion 645–646
9.
BolourianRLazowSBergerJTransoral 2.0-mm miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 2 weeks’ maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective studyJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2002602167–170
10.
HerfordASEllisEIIIUse of a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandibular surgeryJ Oral Maxillofac Surg199856111261–1265
11.
SöderholmALLindqvistCSkutnabbKRahnBBridging of mandibular defects with two different reconstruction systems: an experimental studyJ Oral Maxillofac Surg199149101098–1105
12.
KirkpatrickDGandhiRVan SickelsJEInfections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective reviewJ Oral Maxillofac Surg2003614462–466
13.
CollinsCPPirinjian-LeonardGTolasAAlcaldeRA prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fracturesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200462111392–1395
14.
OehmichenMMeissnerCKönigHGBrain injury after gunshot wounding: morphometric analysis of cell destruction caused by temporary cavitationJ Neurotrauma2000172155–162
15.
AarabiBManagement of missile head woundsNeurosurg Q20031387–104
16.
ColeRDBrowneJDPhippsCDGunshot wounds to the mandible and midface: evaluation, treatment, and avoidance of complicationsOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994111739–745
17.
HenrikssonTGClose range blasts toward the maxillofacial region in attempted suicideScand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg19902481–86
18.
EllisERigid versus nonrigid fixation In: MiloroMLarsenPGhaliGE eds. Peterson's Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryHamilton, ONB.C. Decker Inc.2004371–382
19.
KimYSmithJSercarzJAHeadCAbemayorEBlackwellKEFixation of mandibular osteotomies: comparison of locking and nonlocking hardwareHead Neck2007295453–457
20.
ChiodoTAZiccardiVBJanalMSabitiniCFailure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional Synthes mandibular plates: A laboratory modelJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200664101475–1479
21.
LazowSKTarloIMandible fracture: transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate plus 1 week maxillomandibular fixationAtlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am200917127–34
22.
GutwaldRBüscherPSchrammA, et al. Biomechanical stability of an internal mini-fixation-system in maxillofacial osteosynthesisMed Biol Eng Compu199937280–286
23.
HaugRHStreetCCGoltzMDoes plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking platesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200260111319–1326
24.
CobbARMWalshSLeeNJKumarMBaileyBMThe addition of a locking plate to a modified transbuccal retractor confers increased stability and easier soft tissue control in the application of miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fracturesBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg2008463247–248
