Objectives: To examine reasons why ‘religion’ and ‘psychiatry’, as systems of belief, have a fraught, mistrustful relationship based on conflict regarding the source of knowledge. The former insists that revelation, not rational empirical evidence, the latter's claim for superiority, is the ultimate source that illuminates the soul, not just the self. This tension is illustrated with the case of ‘facilitated communication’, a method that purportedly improves communication for children with pervasive developmental disorder. The controversy highlights an aspect of the differences between ‘scientific’ and ‘religious’ discourse and offers a further dimension to contemporary psychiatry's crisis: the three-way tension between the brain-less, mind-less and soul-less psychiatry.
Conclusion: The suggestion for a possible remedy is to revisit the source of discontent, the Aristotelian doctrine that challenged the ancient wisdom of the immortality of the soul.
SimsA. ‘Psyche’ – Spirit as well as mind. British Journal of Psychiatry1994; 165: 441–446
2.
Religion and Mental Health, SchumakerJ F. Oxford University Press, New York1992
3.
HalaszG. Psychoanalysis and the soul. Journal of Judaism and Civilization1998; 1: 1–6
4.
BiluYGoodmanY C. What does the soul say? Metaphysical uses of facilitated communication in the Jewish ultraorthodox community. Ethos1997; 25: 375–407
5.
CrossleyR. Getting the words out: case studies in facilitated communication training. Topics in Language Disorders1992; 12: 29–41
6.
EllingsenP. Making mind matter. Cries Unheard. A New Look at Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, HalaszGAnafGEllingsenPManneAThomson SaloF. Common Ground, Altona2002
7.
EisenbergL. Mindlessness and brainlessness in psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry1986; 148: 497–508
8.
HalaszG. Clinical practice beyond science: debunking the scientific myth. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 28: 7–13
