Revisiting the Journal Impact Factor

1. Garfield E . Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955; 122: 108–111.

2. Garfield E . Journal impact factor: a brief overview. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999; 161: 979–980.

3. Hecht F Hecht B Sandberg A . The journal -impact factor’: a misnamed, misleading misused measure. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 1998; 104: 77–81.

4. Howard L Wilkinson G . Impact factors of psychiatric journals. British Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 170: 109–112.

5. Institute/for/Scientific/Information . 1998 JCR Journal Citation ReportsScience Edition. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia 1999.

6. Benitez-Bribiesca L . The impact factor of medical journals: its use and misuse. Archives of Medical Research 1999; 30: 161–162.

7. Seglen P . Why the impact factors of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 1997; 314: 497.

8. Opthof T . Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular Research 1997; 33: 1–7.

9. Joseph K Hoey J . CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999; 161: 977–978.

10. Linde A . On the pitfalls of journal ranking by impact factor. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1998; 106: 525–526.

11. van Zanten S . Impact of abstracts and short reports. Letter. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2000; 162: 489.

12. Hansson S . Impact factor as a misleading tool in the evaluation of medical journals. Letter Lancet 1995; 346: 906.

13. Gowrishankar J Divakar P . Sprucing up one's impact factor. Letter. Nature 1999; 401: 321–322.

14. Hoeffel C . Journal impact factors. Allergy 1998; 53: 1225.

15. Weir E Joseph K . How quickly does CMAJ evaluate submissions?. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999; 161: 985.

16. Howard L Wilkinson G . Impact factors of psychiatric journals. British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 457.